'Women Have Choices': Harvey Weinstein's Defense Lawyer Says Accusers Must Take Responsibility
Donna Rotunno said one alleged victim's friendly emails with the ex-filmmaker made clear that their relationship was neither threatening nor pressure-filled.
February 13, 2020 at 06:17 PM
4 minute read
In a nearly five-hour final statement to the Manhattan jury considering criminal rape charges against former Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein, defense lawyer Donna Rotunno said prosecutors have created an "alternate universe."
In that "alternate universe," Rotunno said, adult women are not responsible for where they go, what messages they send or the men they flirt with.
"What are we doing to women? Women have choices," she said.
The argument is part of Weinstein's defense team's contention that the alleged victims in this case actually wanted to have sex with Weinstein, because they were attracted to him or they thought it would advance their careers.
Weinstein has pleaded not guilty to charges of predatory sexual assault, rape and criminal sex act. During three weeks of testimony, six women said Weinstein assaulted them, but Rotunno told the jury to focus on Miriam Haley and Jessica Mann, whose accounts are the basis for the charges of criminal sex act and rape, respectively.
Three of the other alleged victims are "prior bad acts" witnesses, while prosecutors are hoping the fourth, Annabella Sciorra, will help prove the predatory sexual assault charge.
Rotunno showed jurors dozens of written records, including Haley's calendar entries and Mann's emails. She said Mann's friendly emails with Weinstein make clear that their relationship was not threatening or pressure-filled; Mann previously testified that Weinstein seemed careful about putting anything negative in writing.
Rotunno said Weinstein's emails simply show he was generous. He could even be manipulated by the women, she said.
"Every single one of these women reaches out, asks for things, and he does everything he can do to make it happen," she said. "This is not a monster."
Attorneys Douglas Wigdor and Gloria Allred, who are each representing Weinstein accusers, sat in the district attorney's reserved seats, while defense lawyer Tina Glandian joined a group of Weinstein supporters in the rows behind his table.
Rotunno mentioned Allred in her argument, one of several references to the possibility that the women who testified against Weinstein are hoping for a civil payout.
"[Allred] doesn't sit here because it's fun for her," Rotunno said. "She sits here because she knows there's a pot of gold for her at the end of this trial."
Before jurors entered the courtroom Thursday morning, Manhattan Criminal Court Judge James Burke reexamined Weinstein's decision not to testify, referencing his statement to reporters after the defense rested its case Tuesday, when he said he "wanted to" testify. A spokesman said Weinstein's lawyers advised him not to testify.
"I asked you a couple of questions [Tuesday] … but given your subsequent statements, I want to make absolutely certain that it is your decision to not testify at this trial," Burke said.
Weinstein said "yes" in response to two questions from Burke on Thursday, confirming that the decision was his and that he did not want to testify.
Prosecutor Joan Illuzzi-Orbon is expected to give her closing statement Friday, and Burke has said he plans to instruct the jury Feb. 18.
Read more:
Boies Schiller Lawyer Testifies Firm Helped Hire Ex-Spies to Aid Harvey Weinstein
Graphic Testimony From Harvey Weinstein Accuser Is Nearly Derailed by Objections
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWalt Disney, IBM Denied High Court Review of Old NY Franchise Tax Law
3 minute readThe Met Hires GC of Elite University as Next Legal Chief
Just Ahead of Oral Argument, Fubo Settles Antitrust Case with Disney, Fox, Warner Bros.
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The Rise and Risks of Merchant Cash Advance Debt Relief Companies
- 2Ill. Class Action Claims Cannabis Companies Sell Products with Excessive THC Content
- 3Suboxone MDL Mostly Survives Initial Preemption Challenge
- 4Paul Hastings Hires Music Industry Practice Chair From Willkie in Los Angeles
- 5Global Software Firm Trying to Jump-Start Growth Hands CLO Post to 3-Time Legal Chief
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250