'Women Have Choices': Harvey Weinstein's Defense Lawyer Says Accusers Must Take Responsibility
Donna Rotunno said one alleged victim's friendly emails with the ex-filmmaker made clear that their relationship was neither threatening nor pressure-filled.
February 13, 2020 at 06:17 PM
4 minute read
In a nearly five-hour final statement to the Manhattan jury considering criminal rape charges against former Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein, defense lawyer Donna Rotunno said prosecutors have created an "alternate universe."
In that "alternate universe," Rotunno said, adult women are not responsible for where they go, what messages they send or the men they flirt with.
"What are we doing to women? Women have choices," she said.
The argument is part of Weinstein's defense team's contention that the alleged victims in this case actually wanted to have sex with Weinstein, because they were attracted to him or they thought it would advance their careers.
Weinstein has pleaded not guilty to charges of predatory sexual assault, rape and criminal sex act. During three weeks of testimony, six women said Weinstein assaulted them, but Rotunno told the jury to focus on Miriam Haley and Jessica Mann, whose accounts are the basis for the charges of criminal sex act and rape, respectively.
Three of the other alleged victims are "prior bad acts" witnesses, while prosecutors are hoping the fourth, Annabella Sciorra, will help prove the predatory sexual assault charge.
Rotunno showed jurors dozens of written records, including Haley's calendar entries and Mann's emails. She said Mann's friendly emails with Weinstein make clear that their relationship was not threatening or pressure-filled; Mann previously testified that Weinstein seemed careful about putting anything negative in writing.
Rotunno said Weinstein's emails simply show he was generous. He could even be manipulated by the women, she said.
"Every single one of these women reaches out, asks for things, and he does everything he can do to make it happen," she said. "This is not a monster."
Attorneys Douglas Wigdor and Gloria Allred, who are each representing Weinstein accusers, sat in the district attorney's reserved seats, while defense lawyer Tina Glandian joined a group of Weinstein supporters in the rows behind his table.
Rotunno mentioned Allred in her argument, one of several references to the possibility that the women who testified against Weinstein are hoping for a civil payout.
"[Allred] doesn't sit here because it's fun for her," Rotunno said. "She sits here because she knows there's a pot of gold for her at the end of this trial."
Before jurors entered the courtroom Thursday morning, Manhattan Criminal Court Judge James Burke reexamined Weinstein's decision not to testify, referencing his statement to reporters after the defense rested its case Tuesday, when he said he "wanted to" testify. A spokesman said Weinstein's lawyers advised him not to testify.
"I asked you a couple of questions [Tuesday] … but given your subsequent statements, I want to make absolutely certain that it is your decision to not testify at this trial," Burke said.
Weinstein said "yes" in response to two questions from Burke on Thursday, confirming that the decision was his and that he did not want to testify.
Prosecutor Joan Illuzzi-Orbon is expected to give her closing statement Friday, and Burke has said he plans to instruct the jury Feb. 18.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSoundCloud GC Takes Legal Reins of Condé Nast at Tumultuous Time
With SDNY Stay Lifted, Sex Trafficking Civil Suit Against Vince McMahon, WWE Gets Green Light
3 minute readBig Tech and Internet Companies Slammed With Consumer Class Actions in December
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 2Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 3Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 4'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 5Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250