Manhattan Prosecutor Says Harvey Weinstein Emailed 'Confession' About 1990s Rape Allegation
Even if an accuser had a personal relationship with Weinstein, the Manhattan assistant DA said, his sudden sexual aggression still amounted to sexual assault or rape.
February 14, 2020 at 03:37 PM
5 minute read
Harvey Weinstein. Photo: Alberto E. Rodriguez/Getty Images
As news about former Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein's alleged sexual assaults against women began to pour out in October 2017, he exchanged emails with members of his team, Manhattan Assistant District Attorney Joan Illuzzi-Orbon said in court Friday.
One email said that journalist Ronan Farrow was about to report an accusation from actress Annabella Sciorra, according to the document Illuzzi-Orbon showed jurors.
"This is untrue he is the one who writes lies … Get emails … this was consensual or deny it," Weinstein wrote on Oct. 26, 2017, in an unpunctuated email.
Illuzzi-Orbon told jurors during her closing statement that the email amounts to "a confession."
"'Consensual' and 'deny it' are the polar opposites of each other!" she said.
Weinstein has pleaded not guilty to predatory sexual assault, rape and criminal sex act. Sciorra's accusation that Weinstein raped her in her New York apartment in the early 1990s is part of the predatory sexual assault charge.
During three weeks of testimony, five more women also said Weinstein assaulted them. In her closing argument Thursday, defense attorney Donna Rotunno argued that the women engaged in sexual activity with Weinstein because they wanted to advance their own careers in Hollywood or otherwise enjoy access to Weinstein's wealth and power.
Illuzzi-Orbon told jurors Friday that in order for that scenario to be consensual, both parties would have to know about the alleged transaction beforehand.
That wasn't the case with Weinstein, Illuzzi-Orbon said, arguing that the women were "tricked and surprised" by sudden sexual aggression from Weinstein, often while they thought they were meeting him for professional reasons.
"There are no blurred lines here," she said. "This is a crime. And a wanton disregard for other people."
Rotunno repeatedly pointed out inconsistencies between the alleged victims' accounts and the testimony of their friends and associates, but Illuzzi-Orbon urged jurors to see those gaps as a "hallmark of truth" and a sign that each witness was remembering what happened to the best of their ability.
Illuzzi-Orbon urged jurors to take seriously the account of Jessica Mann, who testified that Weinstein raped her in a New York hotel room in March 2013. Mann also testified that after Weinstein first assaulted her in Los Angeles, she felt like her best option was to enter a relationship with him.
Even if an accuser had a personal relationship with Weinstein, the Manhattan assistant DA said, his sudden sexual aggression still amounted to sexual assault or rape.
Jurors might not have made that choice and might not think it was a good one, Illuzzi-Orbon said. But she said Weinstein's legal position would be the same even if Mann had been madly in love with Weinstein or even married to him.
"If all that were true … he still wouldn't be allowed to rape her on March 18, 2013," Illuzzi-Orbon said.
Asked about that argument outside court, Rotunno said Mann's actions after the alleged attacks must be examined.
"It belies common sense that [an alleged victim] would then go out and send emails, have the contact, continue a relationship, send your phone number … that is consent," she said. "The evidence shows consent."
In contrast, Illuzzi-Orbon cited the testimony of the prosecution's expert witness, psychiatrist Barbara Ziv, who said people often stay in contact with an alleged rapist because they want to try to move on from the attack and are often afraid of what will happen if they shut the attacker out.
Illuzzi-Orbon said Weinstein used a similar pattern with many alleged victims.
"He made sure he had contact with the people he was worried about as a little check to make sure that one day, they wouldn't walk out from the shadows and call him exactly what he was: an abusive rapist," she said. "He was wrong."
During her closing argument, Illuzzi-Orbon repeatedly referenced the testimony of Lance Maerov, a former board member of the production firm The Weinstein Co. who was the prosecution's first witness.
Maerov, a middle-aged businessman, seemed to have little in common with the alleged victims. But Illuzzi-Orbon turned to his testimony for proof that the women's descriptions of Weinstein were accurate.
"His public persona was diametrically proposed to who he was in person," Maerov said on the witness stand. He also said Weinstein liked to threaten people, including Maerov himself, with lawsuits.
In front of a crowded courtroom that included Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. and one of the authors of the New York Times article on Weinstein's alleged offenses that sparked the flood of allegations, Illuzzi-Orbon ended her argument by praising the victims.
"They didn't come for a beauty contest, they didn't come for money, they didn't come for fame," she said. "They sacrificed their dignity, their privacy and their peace for the chance of having [a] voice."
The jury is expected to begin deliberations Tuesday.
Read more:
Boies Schiller Lawyer Testifies Firm Helped Hire Ex-Spies to Aid Harvey Weinstein
Graphic Testimony From Harvey Weinstein Accuser Is Nearly Derailed by Objections
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Hasbro Faces Shareholder Ire Over 'Excessive' Toy, Game Inventory Hasbro Faces Shareholder Ire Over 'Excessive' Toy, Game Inventory](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/68/d7/ef03ff8a4ced831763f57095d82f/hasbro-767x633.jpg)
!['Serious Legal Errors'?: Rival League May Appeal Following Dismissal of Soccer Antitrust Case 'Serious Legal Errors'?: Rival League May Appeal Following Dismissal of Soccer Antitrust Case](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/6d/c4/9fef7ed94ec2ab661f4098d24490/hector-gonzalez-2022-002-767x633.jpg)
'Serious Legal Errors'?: Rival League May Appeal Following Dismissal of Soccer Antitrust Case
6 minute read!['It's a Matter of Life and Death:' Ailing Harvey Weinstein Urges Judge to Move Up Retrial 'It's a Matter of Life and Death:' Ailing Harvey Weinstein Urges Judge to Move Up Retrial](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/newyorklawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/389/2024/02/331561191_1-4-767x633.jpg)
'It's a Matter of Life and Death:' Ailing Harvey Weinstein Urges Judge to Move Up Retrial
![Spotify GC Steps Down, Opts to 'Step Away From Full-Time Corporate Life' Spotify GC Steps Down, Opts to 'Step Away From Full-Time Corporate Life'](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/78/5d/c13e6a424c16add1896bae0d5cf4/eve-konstan-767x633.jpg)
Spotify GC Steps Down, Opts to 'Step Away From Full-Time Corporate Life'
2 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Connecticut Movers: New Laterals, Expanding Teams
- 2Eliminating Judicial Exceptions: The Promise of the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act
- 3AI in Legal: Disruptive Potential and Practical Realities
- 4One Court’s Opinion on Successfully Bankruptcy Proofing a Borrower
- 5Making the Case for Workflow Automation
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250