Roberta Kaplan Says Trump Avoided Service in Author's Defamation Suit
Overall, Kaplan argued, Trump's motion for a stay is "just the latest example in a clear pattern of delay in this litigation."
February 18, 2020 at 07:11 PM
3 minute read
Roberta Kaplan detailed what she framed as several months of "foot-dragging" from President Donald Trump in court filings Tuesday, as she argued against the president's motion for a stay in her client's defamation suit.
Kaplan, of Kaplan Hecker & Fink, represents author and advice columnist E. Jean Carroll, who has accused Trump of sexually assaulting her at the Manhattan department store Bergdorf Goodman in the 1990s.
Trump has forcefully denied the allegation, denied knowing Carroll and implied she had falsely accused other men of rape, according to the lawsuit Carroll filed in Manhattan Supreme Court in November.
While arguing in support of Trump's motion for a stay earlier this month, Marc Kasowitz of Kasowitz Benson Torres asked the court to wait while the New York Court of Appeals makes a decision in another pending defamation case, Zervos v. Trump.
Kasowitz wrote that constitutional issues, including whether the president is immune from suits in state courts while in office, must be decided before Carroll's case could move forward.
In Tuesday's filing, Kaplan criticized the Trump defense team for tying the case to Zervos after previously arguing they were unrelated.
Delays in the case harm Carroll's reputation and her livelihood as an advice columnist, Kaplan wrote. She also dismissed the constitutional defense, arguing that Trump's "mere status as president" does not entitle him to a stay.
Overall, Kaplan argued, Trump's motion for a stay is "just the latest example in a clear pattern of delay in this litigation."
Carroll had significant issues even trying to serve Trump with her complaint, Kaplan wrote.
"A process server went to Trump Tower on four different occasions, at different times, and building staff and Secret Service agents blocked each attempt at service," Kaplan wrote. "On one occasion, a Secret Service agent informed the process server that they 'had been instructed not to allow process servers' to effect service."
Another process server was told he wouldn't be allowed to leave Trump Tower if he left papers with the concierge, and that "papers have to go to D.C.," Kaplan wrote, but a Secret Service agent also turned away a process server who went to the White House.
A Manhattan judge eventually allowed Carroll to serve Trump by mailing papers to Trump Tower and the White House and by emailing papers to six attorneys at five different firms, all of which had represented him in various matters.
Before filing the current motion for a stay, Trump argued that his residence in the White House since 2017 meant he was not subject to personal jurisdiction in New York.
Lawyers for Trump listed in court papers, including Kasowitz and LaRocca Hornik Rosen & Greenberg's Lawrence Rosen and Patrick McPartland, did not immediately respond to requests for comment Tuesday.
Kaplan is also the co-founder of the Time's Up Legal Defense Fund, which raises money to support victims of workplace sexual harassment.
Read more:
Defamation Lawsuit Against Donald Trump Can Be Heard by NY Court of Appeals, First Department Rules
Trump May Be Served by Mail at White House in Defamation Suit, Manhattan Judge Says
Roberta Kaplan Files Lawsuit Alleging Trump Defamed Author as Liar in Wake of Rape Accusation
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'You Became a Corrupt Politician': Judge Gives Prison Time to Former Sen. Robert Menendez for Corruption Conviction
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Public Notices/Calendars
- 2Wednesday Newspaper
- 3Decision of the Day: Qui Tam Relators Do Not Plausibly Claim Firm Avoided Tax Obligations Through Visa Applications, Circuit Finds
- 4Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-116
- 5Big Law Firms Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250