Roberta Kaplan Says Trump Avoided Service in Author's Defamation Suit
Overall, Kaplan argued, Trump's motion for a stay is "just the latest example in a clear pattern of delay in this litigation."
February 18, 2020 at 07:11 PM
3 minute read
Roberta Kaplan detailed what she framed as several months of "foot-dragging" from President Donald Trump in court filings Tuesday, as she argued against the president's motion for a stay in her client's defamation suit.
Kaplan, of Kaplan Hecker & Fink, represents author and advice columnist E. Jean Carroll, who has accused Trump of sexually assaulting her at the Manhattan department store Bergdorf Goodman in the 1990s.
Trump has forcefully denied the allegation, denied knowing Carroll and implied she had falsely accused other men of rape, according to the lawsuit Carroll filed in Manhattan Supreme Court in November.
While arguing in support of Trump's motion for a stay earlier this month, Marc Kasowitz of Kasowitz Benson Torres asked the court to wait while the New York Court of Appeals makes a decision in another pending defamation case, Zervos v. Trump.
Kasowitz wrote that constitutional issues, including whether the president is immune from suits in state courts while in office, must be decided before Carroll's case could move forward.
In Tuesday's filing, Kaplan criticized the Trump defense team for tying the case to Zervos after previously arguing they were unrelated.
Delays in the case harm Carroll's reputation and her livelihood as an advice columnist, Kaplan wrote. She also dismissed the constitutional defense, arguing that Trump's "mere status as president" does not entitle him to a stay.
Overall, Kaplan argued, Trump's motion for a stay is "just the latest example in a clear pattern of delay in this litigation."
Carroll had significant issues even trying to serve Trump with her complaint, Kaplan wrote.
"A process server went to Trump Tower on four different occasions, at different times, and building staff and Secret Service agents blocked each attempt at service," Kaplan wrote. "On one occasion, a Secret Service agent informed the process server that they 'had been instructed not to allow process servers' to effect service."
Another process server was told he wouldn't be allowed to leave Trump Tower if he left papers with the concierge, and that "papers have to go to D.C.," Kaplan wrote, but a Secret Service agent also turned away a process server who went to the White House.
A Manhattan judge eventually allowed Carroll to serve Trump by mailing papers to Trump Tower and the White House and by emailing papers to six attorneys at five different firms, all of which had represented him in various matters.
Before filing the current motion for a stay, Trump argued that his residence in the White House since 2017 meant he was not subject to personal jurisdiction in New York.
Lawyers for Trump listed in court papers, including Kasowitz and LaRocca Hornik Rosen & Greenberg's Lawrence Rosen and Patrick McPartland, did not immediately respond to requests for comment Tuesday.
Kaplan is also the co-founder of the Time's Up Legal Defense Fund, which raises money to support victims of workplace sexual harassment.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readTrump, ABC News Settlement in Defamation Lawsuit Includes $1M in Attorney Fees For President-Elect
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250