Education Advocacy Group Sues DeVos Over Student Loan Protection Rule
The suit aims to invalidate a new rule that would impose new requirements and procedural hurdles for students looking to cancel fraudulent loan obligations.
February 19, 2020 at 05:29 PM
4 minute read
A New York public interest group on Wednesday sued U.S. Education Secretary Betsy DeVos in Manhattan federal court over a new rule that rolls back Obama-era protections for students who claim they were defrauded by colleges or universities.
The lawsuit, filed by the Project on Predatory Student Lending and Public Citizen Litigation Group on behalf of the New York Legal Assistance Group, aims to invalidate borrower defense regulations that would impose new requirements and procedural hurdles for students looking to cancel fraudulent loan obligations.
According to the filing, the Department of Education did not take public comment on its planned changes, which NYLAG said would implement a new standard and make it "nearly impossible" for students to obtain loan forgiveness.
The new rule, set to take hold in July, also would shorten the statute of limitations for students to assert borrower defenses and eliminate their ability to pursue claims as a group when the schools they attended engaged in misconduct or suddenly closed. Among other things, it would establish an "extremely burdensome" application process and impose a tougher standard for relief that requires borrowers to submit more evidence.
The Education Department has pointed to a large number of past claims that it says were unsubstantiated as justification for the changes.
On Wednesday, a spokeswoman said "the department will vigorously defend its regulation, which gives students and borrowers the relief that they're owed, restores fairness and due process, extends the period for closed school discharges, and saves the taxpayers up to $11.1 billion over 10 years."
The Obama administration in 2016 overhauled rules protecting taxpayers and borrowers after a 2012 Senate committee report detailed predatory lending practices by for-profit colleges that misled prospective students about program costs and their options for federal financial assistance.
DeVos, starting in 2017, tried three times to block the rules from going into effect while the Education Department crafted new regulations. However, a federal judge later ruled those delays unlawful and ordered that the 2016 rules go into effect.
According to NYLAG's lawsuit, the resulting rule-making process under DeVos treated the Obama-era regulations as though they were no longer in effect and improperly shielded the rules from public comment procedures that are required by law.
"This devastating rule goes above and beyond the department's other significant efforts to deny defrauded students loan relief," Toby Merrill, director of the Project on Predatory Student Lending, said in a statement. "It imposes impossible standards for defrauded students seeking to assert their legal rights to loan cancellation, and relies on explanations that defy logic and rest on no evidence. There is no question this rule is illegal and will not stand up in court."
NYLAG, which offers services, including free legal counseling, to low income New Yorkers called the changes "arbitrary and capricious" and said it would be forced to divert additional time and resources to helping students navigate the administrative claims process.
"If allowed to go into effect, this rule not only would harm thousands of student loan borrowers with low income in New York and across the country, but also put a drain on the resources of NYLAG and other organizations that assist borrowers in seeking the relief they are entitled to," said Jane Greengold Stevens, co-director of NYLAG's Special Litigation Unit. "By issuing this rule, Secretary DeVos is helping for-profit schools evade responsibility and putting even more of a burden on students facing crushing debt."
NYLAG is represented in the suit by Adam Pulver and Adina Rosenbaum of the Public Citizen Litigation Group and Eileen Connor, Toby Merrill and Michael Turri of the Project on Predatory Student Lending.
An online docket-tracking service did not list counsel for Devos and the Education Department on Wednesday.
The case, captioned New York Legal Assistance Group v. DeVos, has not yet been assigned to a judge.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'No Evidence'?: Big Law Firms Defend Academic Publishers in EDNY Antitrust Case
3 minute read'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readLippman Study on Antisemitism at CUNY Weighs Free Speech, Unprotected Acts
'Illegal Conspiracy'?: EDNY Antitrust Class Action Challenges Publishers' 'Unpaid Peer Review Rule'
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How to Support Law Firm Profitability: Train Partners Up
- 2Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 3Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 4Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 5X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250