The SECURE Act: Charitable Gift Implications
The SECURE Act kills the stretch IRA for most heirs. Until this new legislation, an heir could generally have required minimum distributions stretched over his or her life expectancy. And that minimized taxes—plus the assets in the heir's IRA grew tax-free until withdrawn. In his Estate Planning and Philanthropy column, Conrad Teitell discusses the ramifications of the Act's changes.
February 21, 2020 at 12:45 PM
5 minute read
The SECURE1 Act kills the stretch IRA for most heirs. Until this new legislation, an heir could generally have required minimum distributions stretched over his or her life expectancy. And that minimized taxes—plus the assets in the heir's IRA grew tax-free until withdrawn.
Highlights of the new law:
- Required Minimum Distributions start at age 72 (up from 70½).
- Most heirs' IRA payments can't be stretched out for more than 10 years.
- But these beneficiaries (with some qualifications) qualify for "life-expectancy" IRA payments: (1) the IRA owner's surviving spouse; (2) her or his minor child; (3) disabled beneficiaries; (4) chronically ill individuals; and (5) individuals who aren't more than 10 years younger than the deceased IRA owner.
Among other provisions, the SECURE Act:
- Repeals the prohibition on contributions to a traditional IRA by an individual who has attained age 70½.
- Allows long-term part-time workers to participate in 401(k) Plans.
- Allows penalty-free withdrawals from retirement plans up to $5,000 per individual for any "qualified birth or adoption distributions."
- Expands 529 education savings accounts to cover costs associated with registered apprenticeships and up to $10,000 of qualified student loan repayments (including those for siblings).
Drum roll—enter the CHIPS IRA2 (Charity Heirs Income Plan Stretch IRA): Working around the 10-year stretch IRA limitations using charitable remainder trusts:
- Taxwell Smart provides that on his death a charitable remainder unitrust (meeting all the CRUT requirements—e.g., payout of at least 5%, 10% minimum charitable remainder interest) pay his grandchild for life or term of years (not exceeding 20 years). This will save estate taxes (estate tax charitable deduction for value of charitable remainder interest) for Mr. Smart if he's subject to that tax.
- Whether Taxwell is or isn't subject to the estate tax, the transfer of his IRA at his death to fund the CRUT won't subject the heir to tax on Income in Respect of a Decedent (IRD). Payments to the grandchild will be taxable under the four-category taxation regime. And a charitable gift is made at the trust term's end.
- Keep in mind that the Stretch CRT has to pass the 10% minimum remainder interest requirement. For younger heirs, the stretch can't be for life but will be for a term of years (not exceeding 20 years). And for CRATs, the trust must also pass the 5% probability test of Rev. Rul. 77-374.
- No surprise, charitable intent is important. The cost of generosity is reduced by the tax savings to the heir who can have IRA payments stretched more than 10 years.
Giving an heir an income tax charitable deduction:
- Suppose Taxwell's grandson is a successful farmer growing hedge funds in Greenwich, Conn. Grandson Hedgely is already rich beyond the wildest dreams of avarice.
Nevertheless, Taxwell creates a testamentary CRUT for Hedgely with his IRA. Several years go by and Hedgely concludes he really doesn't need the CRUT payments. So he gives his remaining life interest to the named qualified public charitable remainder organization (or qualified public charity that Hedgely has named if he has been given that power). Hedgely will then get an income tax charitable deduction for the then value of his life interest. Taxwell has, in effect, given Hedgely an income tax charitable deduction.
Hedgely on his own figured out how to benefit a charity during the term of his CRUT life interest and get an income tax charitable deduction.
- Suppose Taxwell's estate is subject to the estate tax. On his deathbed he tells Hedgely that he's creating a testamentary CRUT for him funded with Taxwell's IRA. Taxwell extracts Hedgely's promise that he'll give his remaining life interest to the named publicly supported charitable remainder organization within two years of Taxwell's death.
If IRS Agent Seigfried learns of this, he could well deny Taxwell's estate an estate tax charitable deduction for the charitable remainder interest; and collect IRD tax from Hedgely. Taxwell and Hedgely had better talk about this in a motel room with the water running.
Parthian shot. Will the age for taking required minimum distributions (RMDs) now age 72 (instead of 70½) keep donors (ages 70½ to 71) from making charitable distributions from their IRAs until age 72?
Time will tell. Remember, distributions from IRAs when the RMD age was 70½ qualified as QCDs even though they weren't RMDs. So donors can still at ages 70½ to 71 make charitable gifts from their IRAs.
Endnotes:
- Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement Act (effective 1/1/20). The U.S. Bureau of Acronyms must have worked overtime and had to stretch to come up with this acronym.
- How I came up with the CHIPS acronym: Many long showers—where I do my best thinking—didn't help. But then, it hit me while marathon TV football viewing with two grandsons over the holidays. We consumed bushels of CHIPS. Simply put, Charities and Heirs will be in the CHIPS using Income Plans to Stretch heirs' IRA payments. And that's my story—and I'm sticking to it.
Conrad Teitell is a principal at Cummings & Lockwood in Stamford, Conn.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs 'Red Hot' 2024 for Legal Industry Comes to Close, Leaders Reflect and Share Expectations for Next Year
7 minute read'So Many Firms' Have Yet to Announce Associate Bonuses, Underlining Big Law's Uneven Approach
5 minute readTikTok’s ‘Blackout Challenge’ Confronts the Limits of CDA Section 230 Immunity
6 minute readEnemy of the State: Foreign Sovereign Immunity and Criminal Prosecutions after ‘Halkbank’
10 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 2Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 3Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 4Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 5Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250