Film Industry Vet and Inventor Claims Hasbro Stole 'Mash-Ups' Games Idea
The plaintiff, David Wexler, claims from 2007 to 2015 he sat down at least 10 times with Hasbro's product development team and pitched the idea for a new line of "Mash-Up" toys and games that Hasbro is now using without paying him.
February 25, 2020 at 06:30 PM
5 minute read
A film director and the son of a prolific, longstanding game inventor for Hasbro is suing the toy giant, saying that it is reaping millions of dollars in revenues after stealing his idea for a line of Hasbro game and toy combinations called "Mash-Ups."
David Wexler, a film director, screenwriter and producer who has helped to create at least six feature films, has filed a 21-page misappropriation and breach of contract lawsuit against Hasbro in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Wexler claims that from 2007 to 2015 he sat down at least 10 times with Hasbro's product development team—sometimes accompanied by his father, Howard Wexler, the creator of Hasbro's famed Connect 4 game—and pitched different toy ideas, including the idea for a new line of "Mash-Up" games and toys that "would combine the trademarks, gameplay, style and artwork of two classic Hasbro games and toys into a single game or toy; thus creating a new game experience that would be both familiar and novel to players," according to his lawsuit.
But eventually, by 2015, Hasbro told him that it would not be using his ideas and concepts, he claims. Then, around 2016, Hasbro began developing a line of combining, or "mashing up," classic Hasbro games, some of which it would bring to market a few years later, the lawsuit states.
According to both Wexler's complaint and his lawyer, Philippe Zimmerman, a Moses & Singer partner in Manhattan, Wexler had pitched using specific Hasbro combinations such as Yahtzee and Boggle, Monopoly and Trouble, Jenga and Twister, Transformers and Sorry, and Connect 4 and Nerf.
Then in 2019, Hasbro, which some consider to be the largest toy maker in the world—citing its stock market value—started putting out mash-up-type games including a combination of Jenga and Monopoly that Wexler considers to be very similar to his Jenga and Twister idea, according to his complaint. Both his proposed idea and the Jenga/Monopoly "game mash+up" use the Jenga tiles and have the other games' design elements printed on the tiles.
Moreover, Hasbro has released and is making large revenues from a combination of Connect 4 and Nerf that mimics his Connect 4 and Nerf proposal, although the gaming behemoth has not included that combination game in its game mash+up line, according to Wexler's suit.
"In a blatant, albeit doomed, effort to hide its deceit in stealing Mr. Wexler's idea of a collection of Mash-Ups, Hasbro manufactured and sold the Connect 4 and Nerf Mash-Up, but did not include it in its mash+ups collection," says Wexler's lawsuit, which was filed earlier this month.
Hasbro did not respond to a request for comment.
The complaint, while not naming a specific damages amount, demands that continuing royalty fees be paid to Wexler into the future—or in perpetuity, as Zimmerman puts it. The complaint also requests punitive damages.
The suit also makes clear that Wexler believes Hasbro has been making millions of dollars in profits from numerous mash-up-type games, and that its profits will likely grow for years to come.
"Hasbro's game mash+ups have been a commercial success," the complaint says. "After being initially offered exclusively at Target in 2019, game mash+ups are now widely available, including at Walmart and on Amazon."
It adds, "Indeed, upon information and belief, game mash+ups are generating millions of dollars in revenues for Hasbro and are expected to [generate] substantially more in revenues as a result of, among other things, their broader availability and the addition of more games to the game mash+ups collection."
The industry standard for a game or toy investor's royalties is 5%, according to the suit.
It also alleges that if Wexler is not ultimately paid the royalties he deserves, the "trust" long relied on between toy and game inventors and toy companies could be broken.
"Hasbro's conduct in stealing Mr. Wexler's ideas violates a core element of the toy and game inventing industry's custom and practice, and if left to stand, could destroy the trust between toy and game inventors and toy and game companies that has played a critical role in sustaining the toy industry for decades," the suit says.
Howard Wexler has allegedly invented more than 120 game and toy concepts for Hasbro and other companies over many decades, Zimmerman, who specializes in part in intellectual property cases, said by phone Tuesday.
He added that "there is a line of [legal] authority that has developed in New York, California and other jurisdictions that recognize that creative people should be compensated for their work and their ideas. This case presents another example of a creative person needing to go to court to protect their rights."
Zimmerman also said that "Howard [Wexler] is very supportive of his son, and my understanding is he believes his son presented Hasbro with a valuable idea that they are now exploiting without paying him."
"David hopes and expects that his suit with Hasbro will not have any affect on his father's decades-long relationship with Hasbro," the lawyer added.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Uncertainty Hovers Over PGA Merger, LIV Golf Hires Entertainment Industry Veteran as Legal Chief
'Rampant Piracy': US Record Labels File Copyright Suit Against French Distributor Believe
5 minute read'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Companies' Dirty Little Secret: Those Privacy Opt-Out Requests Usually Aren't Honored
- 2Remembering Ted Olson
- 3Support Magistrates: Statutorily Significant
- 4Nelson Mullins, Greenberg Traurig, Jones Day Have Established Themselves As Biggest Outsiders in Atlanta Legal Market
- 5Immunity for Mental Health Care and Coverage for CBD: What's on the Pa. High Court's November Calendar
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250