Weinstein Verdict a Victory for the #MeToo Movement, but Doesn't End Criticism of DA Vance
Local elected officials and women's rights groups renewed calls for Vance's resignation during the Weinstein trial, after Evelyn Yang, the wife of former presidential candidate Andrew Yang, joined the group of women who say they were sexually assaulted by former Columbia University obstetrician Robert Hadden.
February 25, 2020 at 07:22 PM
4 minute read
When a jury found former Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein guilty of criminal sexual act and third-degree rape Monday, Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. was quick to praise the verdict as a step forward for accountability in the wake of the #MeToo movement.
"This is the new landscape for survivors of sexual assault in America," he said minutes after the verdict. "This is a new day."
But Vance's critics were quick to point out that he declined to prosecute Weinstein in 2015, when the former producer was accused of groping an Italian model. Vance has said not all the information that went into that decision, and his subsequent decision to prosecute Weinstein, has been made public.
Local elected officials and women's rights groups renewed calls for Vance's resignation during the Weinstein trial, after Evelyn Yang, the wife of former presidential candidate Andrew Yang, joined the group of women who say they were sexually assaulted by former Columbia University obstetrician Robert Hadden.
Last week, the DA's office announced it was once again investigating allegations against Hadden, four years after he was allowed to take a plea deal that did not lead to prison time.
Marissa Hoechstetter, one of the women who has sued Hadden for assault in Manhattan civil court, founded Reform the SCU to call for transparency in the Manhattan DA's Sex Crimes Unit. She has also called for Vance's resignation.
"The Weinstein verdict does not change anything about Vance's history and the history of how that office has handled sex crimes," she said Tuesday.
Hoechstetter said she believes the #MeToo movement in general has encouraged women to come forward with their accounts of harassment and assault, but she said women still face hurdles in reporting crimes to law enforcement.
"The reality of our experience in the legal system is still far from what many people think it is," she said.
New York State Assemblymember Dan Quart, D-Manhattan, is a candidate for Manhattan District Attorney in the 2021 Democratic primary and has proposed a detailed plan for reform of the DA's Sex Crimes Unit.
He said the Weinstein verdict shows that jury pools, not Manhattan prosecutors, are changing. "I think (the verdict) speaks more to the #MeToo movement and how it's having a positive effect on juries and jury pools throughout different counties, especially in Manhattan, that juries will and can understand and engage on sexual misconduct and rape even in the context of a consensual relationship," Quart said. "But I don't think that has anything to do with how Cy Vance's Sex Crimes Unit is or has been operating over the past 10 years."
A spokesman for the DA's office said Tuesday that the Sex Crimes Unit has made numerous changes since the #MeToo movement accelerated in the fall of 2017, including launching a team dedicated to workplace sexual violence and teaching assistant district attorneys more about interviewing people who've gone through trauma.
Deborah Tuerkheimer, a professor at Northwestern's Pritzker School of Law and a former Manhattan assistant district attorney who focused on domestic violence, said some effects of the Weinstein verdict remain to be seen, but it may give some survivors a "sense of hope" that the criminal justice system will respond appropriately.
"The reason we see so few of these cases brought forward is that prosecutors are worried about how juries will respond to the testimony of accusers," she said. "The Weinstein verdict does show that jurors can believe victims who are quote-unquote imperfect, meaning they don't conform to our idealized notions of how survivors behave, and that will resonate outside of this courtroom."
But the Weinstein accusers don't demonstrate how a jury might respond to a solo accuser, Tuerkheimer pointed out—nor to accusers who are people of color, LGBTQ, immigrants or members of other groups facing discrimination.
Read more:
Harvey Weinstein Found Guilty of 3rd-Degree Rape and Criminal Sexual Act
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Plan Suit
4 minute readRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
Trending Stories
- 1Litigators of the Week: A $630M Antitrust Settlement for Automotive Software Vendors—$140M More Than Alleged Overcharges
- 2Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 3Linklaters Hires Four Partners From Patterson Belknap
- 4Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise, Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
- 5Latest Boutique Combination in Florida Continues Am Law 200 Merger Activity
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250