Weinstein Verdict a Victory for the #MeToo Movement, but Doesn't End Criticism of DA Vance
Local elected officials and women's rights groups renewed calls for Vance's resignation during the Weinstein trial, after Evelyn Yang, the wife of former presidential candidate Andrew Yang, joined the group of women who say they were sexually assaulted by former Columbia University obstetrician Robert Hadden.
February 25, 2020 at 07:22 PM
4 minute read
When a jury found former Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein guilty of criminal sexual act and third-degree rape Monday, Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. was quick to praise the verdict as a step forward for accountability in the wake of the #MeToo movement.
"This is the new landscape for survivors of sexual assault in America," he said minutes after the verdict. "This is a new day."
But Vance's critics were quick to point out that he declined to prosecute Weinstein in 2015, when the former producer was accused of groping an Italian model. Vance has said not all the information that went into that decision, and his subsequent decision to prosecute Weinstein, has been made public.
Local elected officials and women's rights groups renewed calls for Vance's resignation during the Weinstein trial, after Evelyn Yang, the wife of former presidential candidate Andrew Yang, joined the group of women who say they were sexually assaulted by former Columbia University obstetrician Robert Hadden.
Last week, the DA's office announced it was once again investigating allegations against Hadden, four years after he was allowed to take a plea deal that did not lead to prison time.
Marissa Hoechstetter, one of the women who has sued Hadden for assault in Manhattan civil court, founded Reform the SCU to call for transparency in the Manhattan DA's Sex Crimes Unit. She has also called for Vance's resignation.
"The Weinstein verdict does not change anything about Vance's history and the history of how that office has handled sex crimes," she said Tuesday.
Hoechstetter said she believes the #MeToo movement in general has encouraged women to come forward with their accounts of harassment and assault, but she said women still face hurdles in reporting crimes to law enforcement.
"The reality of our experience in the legal system is still far from what many people think it is," she said.
New York State Assemblymember Dan Quart, D-Manhattan, is a candidate for Manhattan District Attorney in the 2021 Democratic primary and has proposed a detailed plan for reform of the DA's Sex Crimes Unit.
He said the Weinstein verdict shows that jury pools, not Manhattan prosecutors, are changing. "I think (the verdict) speaks more to the #MeToo movement and how it's having a positive effect on juries and jury pools throughout different counties, especially in Manhattan, that juries will and can understand and engage on sexual misconduct and rape even in the context of a consensual relationship," Quart said. "But I don't think that has anything to do with how Cy Vance's Sex Crimes Unit is or has been operating over the past 10 years."
A spokesman for the DA's office said Tuesday that the Sex Crimes Unit has made numerous changes since the #MeToo movement accelerated in the fall of 2017, including launching a team dedicated to workplace sexual violence and teaching assistant district attorneys more about interviewing people who've gone through trauma.
Deborah Tuerkheimer, a professor at Northwestern's Pritzker School of Law and a former Manhattan assistant district attorney who focused on domestic violence, said some effects of the Weinstein verdict remain to be seen, but it may give some survivors a "sense of hope" that the criminal justice system will respond appropriately.
"The reason we see so few of these cases brought forward is that prosecutors are worried about how juries will respond to the testimony of accusers," she said. "The Weinstein verdict does show that jurors can believe victims who are quote-unquote imperfect, meaning they don't conform to our idealized notions of how survivors behave, and that will resonate outside of this courtroom."
But the Weinstein accusers don't demonstrate how a jury might respond to a solo accuser, Tuerkheimer pointed out—nor to accusers who are people of color, LGBTQ, immigrants or members of other groups facing discrimination.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCourt System Names New Administrative Judges for New York City Courts in Leadership Shakeup
3 minute readRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250