DiFiore Backs Bail Reform Law Tweak, Court Reorganization in State of Judiciary Speech
"Given a blank slate upon which to create a court system, no rational person would ever design the system we have in place today," New York State Chief Judge Janet DiFiore said.
February 26, 2020 at 01:51 PM
4 minute read
In her annual State of the Judiciary address Wednesday, New York State Chief Judge Janet DiFiore said she wants to see more judicial discretion allowed in the state's new bail reform law.
Judges should be able to consider whether defendants pose a "credible risk of danger," she said.
"I believe that without compromising the purity of its purpose, the new legislation can be amended and strengthened to recognize a narrow exception allowing judges, after a full and fair adversarial hearing, to detain a defendant in those few and extraordinary cases where such a credible threat exists," she said.
The state's top judicial official also spoke at length about her proposal to reorganize the court system.
"Given a blank slate upon which to create a court system, no rational person would ever design the system we have in place today," DiFiore said. "Our current structure simply does not serve the public well."
DiFiore said she recently met with Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie and Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins and was told they would "explore the issues thoroughly." She also thanked Gov. Andrew Cuomo for supporting the goal of court simplification in his 2021 budget.
Under DiFiore's proposal to amend the state constitution, announced in September, New York's 11 trial courts would be consolidated into a three-tier system, including a centralized state Supreme Court, a Municipal Court, and the current town and village courts.
The state Supreme Court would eliminate many of the state's current trial courts and fold them into a unified entity with six divisions: family, probate, criminal, state claims, commercial and general. The Municipal Court would be composed of many of the state's more localized courts.
The plan would reduce unnecessary court appearances and associated costs for litigants, including child care and transportation, DiFiore said.
She acknowledged that some court officials have had reservations about the plan, but she said the changes can be absorbed in the budget. Judges in the eliminated courts are expected to stay on the bench in the newly consolidated courts, according to the plan, which will also preserve the status quo in terms of which judges are elected and which are appointed.
"Importantly, we do not intend to reduce our number," she said. "No jobs, I repeat, no jobs—not one—will be lost due to court simplification. Frankly, the system is under-resourced and one of the major benefits of simplification will be to maximize the efficiency and productivity of the resources now at our disposal."
The proposal will also make it easier for the legislature to add a Fifth Judicial Department, she said.
In a statement, New York Civil Liberties Union policy counsel Nicole Triplett responded to DiFiore's bail reform stance, saying that attempting to predict defendants' dangerousness "inevitably deepens the racial inequalities that bail reform was meant to address in the first place."
"Using risk assessments or attempting to predict someone's future dangerousness is guesswork that will simply shift the methods we use to put innocent people behind bars," Triplett said. "The evidence shows that it is nearly impossible to accurately predict whether someone will commit a crime in the future."
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCourt System Names New Administrative Judges for New York City Courts in Leadership Shakeup
3 minute readRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Mental Health Issues Don’t Get a Holiday
- 2'It's Got to Be a Wake-Up Call:' Atlanta Attorney Hopes $16M Verdict Spurs Training Changes at Hotels
- 3FTC Bans 'Junk Fees' in Live-Event Tickets and Short-Term Lodging
- 4California Legal Awards Moving to Mid-Summer Date in 2025, Adds New Categories
- 5Law Student Sues NY Attorney Grievance Officials, Seeking Materials Over Sexual Assault Claims
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250