Seyfarth Report Finds 2019 Another Record Year for ADA Title III Suits—Nationally and in NY
New York state set a statewide record with its number of ADA Title III federal suits, accounting for 2,635 of the 11,053 suits lodged nationally, according to data painstakingly compiled by the law firm Seyfarth Shaw.
February 27, 2020 at 06:34 PM
3 minute read
More than 11,000 Americans with Disabilities Act Title III—or private entity access—lawsuits were launched in the federal courts in 2019, setting a record for the number of Title III lawsuits lodged nationally in a year since the law firm Seyfarth Shaw began compiling the data about seven years ago.
New York state set its own statewide record with its number of suits, accounting for 2,635 of the 11,053 suits nationwide, Seyfarth reports. New York was second only to California's 4,794 Title III federal actions, which was a record yearly amount in the Golden State.
On the whole, California, New York and Florida continued to lead the nation, by far, in having the highest numbers of ADA Title III federal suits. The three states accounted for 84% of all the suits launched nationwide, according to Seyfarth data set out in a Feb. 20 blog post by Seyfarth labor and employment partners by Minh Vu and Kristina Launey, as well as by Seyfarth librarian Susan Ryan.
The Seyfarth data shows that each year the firm has collected the data, the number of Title III actions has risen nationally, jumping from 2,722 in 2013 to 11,053 in 2019.
In their post, the law partners, who have led the ADA-suit data collection, and librarian Ryan write that the "record-breaking" 2019 numbers include Title III actions filed "on all grounds," including access to "physical facilities, websites and mobile applications, service animals, sign language interpreters, and more."
The Seyfarth figures, they note, don't include the "significant number of disability access lawsuits filed in state courts which are much more difficult to accurately track."
In a Jan. 6 Seyfarth blog post by Washington, D.C.-based partner Vu—in which she examined, in part, what types of Title III lawsuits are "trending now"—she pointed to, in one example, Braille gift card actions lodged in New York's busiest federal courts.
Since October 2019, she wrote, "more than a dozen blind plaintiffs represented by five attorneys have filed at least 243 lawsuits in the Southern and Eastern districts of New York alleging that retailers and other businesses have violated the ADA and New York state and city laws by failing to offer for sale gift cards that have all the information printed on the cards shown in Braille." She noted that the cases had been assigned to at least 29 different judges.
Among other trending types of Title III suits pointed to by Vu were website and mobile app accessibility lawsuits, hotel accessibility information on reservations websites, and the many inaccessible facilities suits that she wrote historically have been prolific.
Vu and her co-authors, in the more recent post on the 2019 statistics, explain that, to collect the data, the firm used "a painstaking manual process of going through all federal cases that were coded as 'ADA-Other' and manually culling out the ADA Title II cases in which the defendants are state and local governments."
They note that the "manual process means there is the small possibility of human error."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrade Secret Litigation: How Will AI Innovations Likely Be Litigated?
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1How to Support Law Firm Profitability: Train Partners Up
- 2Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 3Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 4Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 5X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250