New Jury Trials Postponed in New York, Jury Selection Suspended Until Further Notice
In an attempt to manage traffic in busy areas of courthouses, Marks also suspended civil Trial Assignment Parts and urged that courthouse appearances for conferences be minimized.
March 13, 2020 at 01:59 PM
5 minute read
Jury trials in New York state courts will come to a near-halt Monday due to concerns about COVID-19, Chief Administrative Judge Lawrence Marks announced in a memo to court employees Friday.
Jury trials that are already ongoing—civil trials that have begun opening statements and criminal matters in which the jury has been sworn—will keep going, Marks said, but no new jury trials will start.
Jury selection will be suspended until further notice across the state starting Monday, in both criminal and civil matters, Marks said.
New York's court system is among a flurry of high-profile institutions nationwide that have shifted or postponed their operations out of coronavirus concerns, many moving at a rapid clip to cut down the virus' spread.
An executive order from Gov. Andrew Cuomo authorizing the criminal jury actions is imminent, according to Marks' memo.
Cuomo said Friday there has been no discussion about shutting down the state's court system.
In an attempt to manage traffic in busy areas of courthouses, Marks also suspended civil Trial Assignment Parts and urged the reduction of courthouse appearances for conferences.
"Effective March 16, centralized preliminary conference parts shall be managed with a goal of minimizing courthouse appearances, maximizing adjournments and stipulations on consent, and directing remote appearances through Skype or telephone," Marks wrote.
Compliance conferences will also generally be postponed, starting Monday, or conducted by phone or Skype if necessary.
Existing grand juries will continue, Marks said, but no new grand juries will be empaneled "absent exceptional circumstances."
Marks also confirmed a one-week moratorium on evictions in New York City, which is subject to extension upon review.
New York, one of the top states affected by the coronavirus, announced a ban on gatherings of more than 500 people and new rules that restrict the operating capacity of businesses.
Officials reported Friday there are 421 confirmed cases of coronavirus New York. Ninety six of those cases are new.
There are 154 coronavirus cases tied to New York City and 158 related to Westchester County, where a cluster of cases in New Rochelle has prompted a "containment area" in the city that has shut down schools and houses of worship.
Cuomo codified the large-gatherings ban in an executive order that took advantage of his newly expanded powers.
A bill recently greenlighted by the Legislature gives the governor the power to issue "any directive" during a state disaster emergency that's tied to a disease outbreak or epidemic. The bill, which also provided an emergency appropriation of $40 million, specified that any directive "must be necessary to cope with the disaster."
Legal experts say the legislation now allows the governor to issue directives during a state of emergency, instead of simply suspending laws that might hinder an emergency disaster response.
Hermes Fernandez, who chairs the state bar association's health law section, said the legislation essentially gives the governor the power to "rule by decree" as long as it's related to an identified emergency.
But the state Legislature could also cancel an emergency executive order issued under the law, he said.
Under the executive order, all large events with more than 500 people will be postponed for a minimum of 30 days. Businesses with a seating capacity of under 500 people will have to operate at half their capacity for the next 30 days, according to the order.
A variety of places are exempted from the capacity rules, including grocery stores, government buildings, mass transit, nursing homes, schools and hospitals.
READ MORE:
Red Signs Restricting Entry as Coronavirus Measure Are Coming to All NY State Courthouses, Officials Say
New York Delays Major Opioid Trial Due to Coronavirus Concerns 'Out of an Abundance of Caution'
Coronavirus Won't Curtail NY Legislature, But May Send Criminal Justice Issues to Back Burner
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readEric Adams Trial Set for April as Defense Urges Dismissal of Bribery Count
Major Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
- 2Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Bill Tanenbaum, Partner & Chair, AI & Data Law Practice Group at Moses Singer
- 3Morgan & Morgan Looks to Grow Into Complex Litigation While Still Keeping its Billboards Up
- 4Thursday Newspaper
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250