Remote Computing: Cyber Protection From Home
Lawyers cannot let their guard down when they are using the shared family laptop while working from home in sweats.
March 16, 2020 at 06:33 PM
5 minute read
The COVID-19 outbreak is forcing lawyers to work at home, and the threat of being "hacked" at home, where the regimen of a law firm's policies and costly IT infrastructure do not exist, remains even greater than at the office. The fact is that attorneys have an ethical obligation to protect law firm and client confidences, and doing so when working remotely is not so easy. The virus outbreak has exposed chinks in the amour of the confident legal profession where vulnerabilities exist.
Lawyers cannot let their guard down when they are using the shared family laptop while working from home in sweats. This is just what the "bad guys" are relying upon when they seek to "hack" into your unsecure home system or compromise your Gmail account or "phish" you with malignant links enticing you to click on them to find out the current status of court closings or the spread of the virus in your neighborhood.
Realizing lawyers' weakness in this area, the Committee on Technology and the Legal Profession of NYSBA last week issued a report titled Cybersecurity Alert: Tips for Working Securely While Working Remotely focusing on providing practical, understandable cybersecurity advice designed to provide attorneys with a checklist of tips to help them work securely when working remotely. In fact, on Wednesday, March 18th, NYSBA will be streaming out a webinar titled "Cyber-Protect Your Firm When You Work From Home." The implications of the COVID-19 outbreak only further demonstrates why it is so important to understand how to protect client confidences and the reason why the Committee has recommended that NYSBA support a proposal to include one credit of cybersecurity education to an attorney's biennial CLE ethics requirement.
Below is a summary of the Committee's cybersecurity checklist to follow while working from home:
(1) Have a remotely secure accessed digital workspace. It should enable access to email, documents and billing applications. Make sure every attorney and staff member knows how to use it to access needed information.
(2) Consider providing attorneys with the ability to conduct telephone and video conferences from home.
- Attorneys may be tempted to use free services, which may not be
secure, or use services that keep recordings of conversations and meetings by default. Leaving those recordings out of the firm's control and protection is not prudent.
(3) Properly prepare attorneys and staff for work-from-home.
- Make sure they know how to access their work voicemail (and know their passcode)
- Verify that they have access to a laptop, iPad or other devices so that they can work effectively from out of the office
- Encourage them to check that their devices have all recommended system updates and patches installed
- Advise them that devices should require strong passwords and, if possible, segregated with separate passwords for separate access for family members Consider requiring all attorneys and staff to change their passwords frequently during the course of the remote-working period
- Verify they all have the digital workspace properly installed on their out of- office devices
- Educate attorneys and staff on the dangers of linking to the firm's systems using insecure publicly-available Wi-Fi, or using a home Wi-Fi connection that lacks strong password protection
(4) Prepare for the cybersecurity risks of remote working.
- Understand that all of the firm's efforts to prevent malware from entering the IT system have not been applied to attorney and staff personal devices
- Personal devices may already be infected with malware, particularly if used by children or other family members who click unsafe links sent by hackers
- Personal devices likely do not have the perimeter controls and virus detectors installed on firm systems, and often lack required patches to security flaws in their operating system and applications
- Warn against using personal devices that are not secure
- Beware of attorneys and staff who send copies of emails and documents through their personal email accounts
- Set a policy forbidding saving of client confidential emails and documents directly on personal devices (they should be stored only on the firm's system, using the remotely-accessed digital workspace/VPN)
- If client confidential data is saved to the devices' hard drives, it should be deleted as soon as practicable
- Instruct attorneys and staff not to store or transfer confidential data using unapproved personal cloud service accounts
(5) IT security should go on high alert.
- Watching closely for anomalies in activity on your system and evidence of hacking during this time of vulnerability
- Keep better logs of network activities to enable better information about threats
- Keeping a particular eye on remote access
- Considering "stress-testing" your security protocols, perhaps randomly, to determine where vulnerabilities lie and plug them before bad guys can get into your firm's network
Mark A. Berman is a commercial litigation partner at Ganfer Shore Leeds & Zauderer. He is a past chair of the Commercial & Federal Litigation Section of the New York State Bar Association (NYSBA) and the current co-chair of NYSBA's Committee on Technology and the Legal Profession.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Journal Column on Marital Residence Sales in Pending Divorces Puts 'Misplaced' Reliance on Two Cases
8 minute readA Time for Action: Attorneys Must Answer MLK's Call to Defend Bar Associations and Stand for DEI Initiatives in 2025
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Haynes and Boone Expands in New York With 7-Lawyer Seward & Kissel Fund Finance, Securitization Team
- 2Upstart Insurer That's Wowing Industry Hires AIG Legal Exec to Help Guide Global Expansion
- 3Connecticut Lawyers in Spotlight for Repping FBI Agents
- 4SEC Sued for Failing to Reveal Records Involving Simpson Thacher Attorney
- 5Lawsuit Accuses University of California of Racial Discrimination in Admissions
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250