Remote Computing: Cyber Protection From Home
Lawyers cannot let their guard down when they are using the shared family laptop while working from home in sweats.
March 16, 2020 at 06:33 PM
5 minute read
The COVID-19 outbreak is forcing lawyers to work at home, and the threat of being "hacked" at home, where the regimen of a law firm's policies and costly IT infrastructure do not exist, remains even greater than at the office. The fact is that attorneys have an ethical obligation to protect law firm and client confidences, and doing so when working remotely is not so easy. The virus outbreak has exposed chinks in the amour of the confident legal profession where vulnerabilities exist.
Lawyers cannot let their guard down when they are using the shared family laptop while working from home in sweats. This is just what the "bad guys" are relying upon when they seek to "hack" into your unsecure home system or compromise your Gmail account or "phish" you with malignant links enticing you to click on them to find out the current status of court closings or the spread of the virus in your neighborhood.
Realizing lawyers' weakness in this area, the Committee on Technology and the Legal Profession of NYSBA last week issued a report titled Cybersecurity Alert: Tips for Working Securely While Working Remotely focusing on providing practical, understandable cybersecurity advice designed to provide attorneys with a checklist of tips to help them work securely when working remotely. In fact, on Wednesday, March 18th, NYSBA will be streaming out a webinar titled "Cyber-Protect Your Firm When You Work From Home." The implications of the COVID-19 outbreak only further demonstrates why it is so important to understand how to protect client confidences and the reason why the Committee has recommended that NYSBA support a proposal to include one credit of cybersecurity education to an attorney's biennial CLE ethics requirement.
Below is a summary of the Committee's cybersecurity checklist to follow while working from home:
(1) Have a remotely secure accessed digital workspace. It should enable access to email, documents and billing applications. Make sure every attorney and staff member knows how to use it to access needed information.
(2) Consider providing attorneys with the ability to conduct telephone and video conferences from home.
- Attorneys may be tempted to use free services, which may not be
secure, or use services that keep recordings of conversations and meetings by default. Leaving those recordings out of the firm's control and protection is not prudent.
(3) Properly prepare attorneys and staff for work-from-home.
- Make sure they know how to access their work voicemail (and know their passcode)
- Verify that they have access to a laptop, iPad or other devices so that they can work effectively from out of the office
- Encourage them to check that their devices have all recommended system updates and patches installed
- Advise them that devices should require strong passwords and, if possible, segregated with separate passwords for separate access for family members Consider requiring all attorneys and staff to change their passwords frequently during the course of the remote-working period
- Verify they all have the digital workspace properly installed on their out of- office devices
- Educate attorneys and staff on the dangers of linking to the firm's systems using insecure publicly-available Wi-Fi, or using a home Wi-Fi connection that lacks strong password protection
(4) Prepare for the cybersecurity risks of remote working.
- Understand that all of the firm's efforts to prevent malware from entering the IT system have not been applied to attorney and staff personal devices
- Personal devices may already be infected with malware, particularly if used by children or other family members who click unsafe links sent by hackers
- Personal devices likely do not have the perimeter controls and virus detectors installed on firm systems, and often lack required patches to security flaws in their operating system and applications
- Warn against using personal devices that are not secure
- Beware of attorneys and staff who send copies of emails and documents through their personal email accounts
- Set a policy forbidding saving of client confidential emails and documents directly on personal devices (they should be stored only on the firm's system, using the remotely-accessed digital workspace/VPN)
- If client confidential data is saved to the devices' hard drives, it should be deleted as soon as practicable
- Instruct attorneys and staff not to store or transfer confidential data using unapproved personal cloud service accounts
(5) IT security should go on high alert.
- Watching closely for anomalies in activity on your system and evidence of hacking during this time of vulnerability
- Keep better logs of network activities to enable better information about threats
- Keeping a particular eye on remote access
- Considering "stress-testing" your security protocols, perhaps randomly, to determine where vulnerabilities lie and plug them before bad guys can get into your firm's network
Mark A. Berman is a commercial litigation partner at Ganfer Shore Leeds & Zauderer. He is a past chair of the Commercial & Federal Litigation Section of the New York State Bar Association (NYSBA) and the current co-chair of NYSBA's Committee on Technology and the Legal Profession.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhy Is It Becoming More Difficult for Businesses to Mandate Arbitration of Employment Disputes?
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1$34M Verdict Shows How 1 Claim Could Ratchet Up Employment Suit
- 2OIG Progress Puts Connecticut in Leadership Position
- 3Bankruptcy Judge to Step Down in 2025
- 4Justices Seek Solicitor General's Views on Music Industry's Copyright Case Against ISP
- 5Judge to hear arguments on whether Google's advertising tech constitutes a monopoly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250