NY AG James Presses Fight Against Trump Administration Rule to Curtail Food Assistance
James hailed the preliminary injunction from U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell as a win in the face of a national public health emergency.
March 17, 2020 at 06:13 PM
4 minute read
New York Attorney General Letitia James said a proposed federal rule that would curtail food assistance would be more destructive than ever as the nation faces the coronavirus, after a federal judge temporarily blocked the Trump administration from implementing the measure.
James and a coalition of state attorneys general said the rule would deny assistance to hundreds of thousands of Americans.
The Friday order from Chief U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell of the District of Columbia, which referenced the pandemic, put in place a preliminary injunction that for now blocks the U.S. Department of Agriculture from implementing the rule.
James said the rule, if it had gone into effect, would have cut off access to food assistance for more than 50,000 people in New York City alone.
COVID-19 is a declared pandemic by the World Health Organization and officials say New York has the most recorded cases in the nation with more than 1,300 across the state as of midday Tuesday.
The coronavirus forced New York, New Jersey and Connecticut to implement sweeping new crowd capacity rules that closed gyms, movie theaters and casinos and banned on-premise service at restaurants and bars.
Howell wrote that the new rule, which was set to go into effect in April, would "dramatically alter" long-standing operations of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and put more stringent requirements on the state's award of those benefits.
"Especially now, as a global pandemic poses widespread health risks, guaranteeing that government officials at both the federal and state levels have flexibility to address the nutritional needs of residents and ensure their well-being through programs like SNAP, is essential," she wrote in the order.
COVID-19 is a declared pandemic by the World Health Organization and officials say New York has the most recorded cases in the nation with more than 1,300 across the state as of midday Tuesday.
Howell's order is tied to a lawsuit filed by a cohort of states, including New York, that challenges the rule, which the lawsuit estimated would eliminate food assistance for nearly 700,000 people.
The lawsuit filed by the attorneys general alleges that the rule "arbitrarily" reverses a decades-old policy that gives states more discretion to seek work requirement waivers for areas that don't have enough jobs for recipients.
There are time limits on benefits for unemployed people between the ages of 18 and 49, who are not disabled or raising children, according to the lawsuit. It argues the law allows states to seek waivers to suspend a time limit if an area has an unemployment rate of over 10% or does not have enough jobs.
"The Rule unequivocally runs afoul of Congress's intent to ensure food security for low-income individuals," according to the lawsuit, which also argues that states are in the best position to evaluate local economic conditions.
James hailed the preliminary injunction as a win in the face of a national public health emergency.
"At a time of national crisis, this decision is a win for common sense and basic human decency," James said in a statement. "This rule is cruel to its core and runs counter to who we are and what we represent as a nation."
READ MORE:
NY AG Letitia James Says City Owes $810 Million for Taxi Medallion Fraud Scheme
Letitia James Asks Congress for Stronger 'Forever Chemical' Regulations to Aid State Litigation
NY AG's Office Calls for More Funding to Comply With New Criminal Procedure Requirements
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readTrump Picks Personal Criminal Defense Lawyers for Solicitor General, Deputy Attorney General
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250