NY Court Relaxes Limits on Online Law Classes Amid COVID-19 Response
Students at Columbia Law School and New York University School of Law have received word that their newly online classes will count toward their bar exam eligibility.
March 18, 2020 at 10:01 AM
3 minute read
Law students in New York who are worried that their new online classes won't count toward their J.D. or LL.M. credit requirements due to state limits can rest assured.
The New York Court of Appeals on Tuesday granted both Columbia Law School and New York University School of Law waivers suspending its restrictions on credit hours students may take online for the spring 2020 semester. All of New York's 15 law schools have canceled in-person instruction and shifted classes online amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Some schools are already delivering classes online, while others will begin to do so in the coming weeks.
The schools with waivers will not have to maintain strict compliance with those rules, which limit J.D. students to taking no more than 15 credits online—out of a minimum 83—and prohibit them from taking online courses until they have earned at least 28 credits, which effectively prohibits online first-year classes. The New York rules do not permit LL.M. students to take any courses via distance education. Those rules determine who is eligible to sit for the New York bar exam.
The waivers apply only to Columbia and NYU students, but it signals that New York's other law schools should have a clear path to obtaining their own waivers amid the coronavirus crisis.
"I am sure this comes as good news, especially to our graduating 3L and LL.M. students, and will help to relieve some of the uncertainty caused by the suspension of in-person classes due to COVID-19," Columbia Law dean Gillian Lester wrote in an email to students Tuesday.
Some bar exam and admission eligibility issues remain unaddressed, Lester noted. For instance, the court has not yet weighed in on the requirement that graduates complete at least 50 hours of pro bono work, which could impact third-year students who have not yet met that threshold. Lester wrote that the school will continue to seek clarity on that matter and others, but noted that the pro bono work is a requirement for admission to the bar and would not prevent any graduates from taking the bar exam.
New York has stricter distance education limits than the American Bar Association, which allows J.D. students to take up to a third of their credits online, which at many school amounts to 28 to 30 credits. The ABA has already issued guidance to law schools that they have flexibility to exceed those limits amid the coronavirus response.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
'No Evidence'?: Big Law Firms Defend Academic Publishers in EDNY Antitrust Case
3 minute read'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readLippman Study on Antisemitism at CUNY Weighs Free Speech, Unprotected Acts
Trending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250