NYC Criminal Courts Move Arraignments to Video, but Lawyers Will Still Be in Court
Criminal courthouses in each borough will have three video parts, which will together handle "all essential Criminal Court functions" until further notice, court officials said.
March 18, 2020 at 02:56 PM
2 minute read
People arrested in New York City will now participate in arraignments via videoconference, court officials announced Wednesday.
The change is part of the New York state court system's switch, effective 5 p.m. Monday, to an "essential functions only" mode to limit courthouse traffic amid the spread of coronavirus.
Criminal courthouses in each borough will have three video parts, which will together handle "all essential Criminal Court functions" until further notice, court officials said.
One court part will have a video link to the relevant county's central booking building, where people without suspected coronavirus exposure or COVID-19 symptoms will appear. Lawyers and judges will still appear in court, and separate video feeds will allow defense attorneys to talk to their clients while the client also participates in the overall hearing.
The second court part will operate similarly, but it's dedicated to people showing COVID-19 symptoms or with potential exposure at the time of their arrests, court officials said. Those defendants will be held at Red Hook Community Court for cases in Brooklyn, Queens and Staten Island and at Midtown Community Court for cases in Manhattan and the Bronx, and video links in each county's courthouse will allow them to appear remotely.
In both parts, judges will be able to send securing orders and orders of protection electronically.
The third court part will handle essential applications other than arraignments, and defendants will appear remotely unless the supervising judge orders otherwise, court officials said.
Other than these essential activities, most criminal court matters are being delayed. The court is issuing "administrative adjournments" for 30 days if the defendant is in jail and 90 days if the defendant is not in jail.
City jails have also ended in-person visits. Legal visits will be conducted remotely, city officials said.
READ MORE:
How an Unheralded Change to Criminal Procedure Law §150.20 Will Overhaul Arrest Procedures in New York
Prosecutors Brace for Sweeping Change as NY Criminal Justice Reforms Take Effect
No Plans to Delay, Change NY's New Criminal Justice Laws, Senate Leader Says
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Plan Suit
4 minute readRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250