Your Child's Taxes Under New Law: What You Need To Know
The Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020 (P.L. 116-94), which was signed into law on Dec. 20, 2019, made a number of dramatic changes that impact the taxation of children. Sidney Kess discusses the changes in this edition of his Tax Tips column.
March 20, 2020 at 12:30 PM
6 minute read
The Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020 (P.L. 116-94), which was signed into law on Dec. 20, 2019, made a number of dramatic changes that impact the taxation of children. If you are the parent of a minor child, it's up to you to file an income tax return on their behalf if one is required. Here are some changes of note.
|Kiddie Tax
Like adults, children must file a tax return if they have sufficient income to warrant it (filing thresholds change annually and special threshold apply to children who are dependents). For certain children, there's a "kiddie tax." This is not a separate tax, but a method of figuring tax on a child's unearned income over a threshold amount ($2,200 in 2019 and 2020) (Code §1(g)). The nature of the income as being unearned income (e.g., bank interest, dividends, capital gain distributions, and taxable scholarships) controls the applicability of the kiddie tax and not the source of the income (e.g., a gift from a parent or other relative or investment return on a child's earned income). The purpose of the kiddie tax, which was introduced by the Tax Reform Act of 1986, is to prevent parents from shifting investment income to children as a way to reduce the overall tax bill for the family.
The kiddie tax applies to a child with a living parent and who is under age 18 at the end of the year, age 18 but less than 19 and earned income that does not exceed half of his or her support, or age 19 but under 24 and a full-time student. It does not include a child who files a joint return with another taxpayer. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) changed the way in which the kiddie tax was calculated. Prior to this law, the tax on the child's unearned income over the threshold amount was figured using the parent's marginal rates for ordinary income as well as for long-term gains and qualified dividends. This required waiting for the parent to file his/her (or joint) return to know what that rates were. The TCJA substituted the rates for trusts and estates. However, this change meant, for example, that children receiving survivor benefits from a parent killed in combat were severely penalized in the amount of taxes paid. As a result, the spending measure repealed the TCJA change effective for 2020. The spending measure allows the former rules to be used for 2018 and/or 2019 returns at the taxpayer's election. Thus, the parent's rate can be used to figure the kiddie tax on a 2019 return. If desired, an amended return can be filed for 2018 on which an election is made to use the parent's rates and obtain a tax refund. And parents continue to have the option of reporting the child's unearned income on their returns, if eligible, using Form 8814, Parents' Election to Report Child's Interest and Dividends.
A child may also be subject to the alternative minimum tax (AMT). There had been a special AMT exemption amount for individuals under age 24. Again, the spending measure suspended for 2019 and 2020, and retroactively for 2018, the special exemption amount. As a result, a child subject to the AMT can use the exemption amount for his/her filing status. And again, if a child paid the AMT in 2018 but would not have owed it if the regular AMT exemption (and not the special one) was used, consider filing an amended return.
|Stretch IRAs
Parents and grandparents may want to leave their retirement accounts and IRAs to children or grandchildren. They can designate such individuals to inherit the accounts on their demise. Until now, non-spouse beneficiaries, including children and grandchildren, who inherited these accounts could stretch their required minimum distributions (RMDs) over their life expectancy (determined by Table I, Single Life Expectancy, in the Appendix of Publication 590-B). The spending measure (which includes the SECURE Act) eliminates the so-called stretch IRA by requiring accounts to be fully distributed by the end of the 10th year following the year of death. There are no RMDs during this period, although distributions can be taken at any time. However, special rules apply to "eligible designated beneficiaries." An eligible designated beneficiary includes a minor child.
A minor child for this purpose is a person who has not reached the age of majority under state law (usually age 18). However, a child who is has not completed "a specified course of education" may be considered a minor until age 26 (Reg. §1.401(a)(9)-6), although the meaning of this is not entirely clear. A grandchild is not an eligible designated beneficiary under this rule, although the grandchild could be one under another designated beneficiary category, such as a disabled individual.
The rules for RMDs for a minor child are complicated. While they are minors, they continue to take RMDs under the old rules. However, once they reach the age of majority, whatever that is, then the 10-year period begins to run.
For minor children who inherited accounts from a person who died before 2020, the old rules continue to apply; they are grandfathered in for the current beneficiary. For example, an owner died in 2019 and named her grandchild as the designated beneficiary of her IRA. The grandchild's life expectancy was set to run for 66 years. The grandchild can continue to take RMDs over this period. However, when the grandchild dies, whatever is remaining in the account and payable to a successor beneficiary must be distributed according to the new anti-stretch rules.
|Distributions From 529 plans
The spending measure introduced two new opportunities for using funds from 529 plans on a tax-free basis to benefit children. Both rules apply to distributions made after Dec. 31, 2019 (i.e., they do not have to be reported as taxable distributions on 2019 returns).
- Apprenticeship programs. Qualified expenses for purposes of 529 plans include costs associated with registered apprenticeship programs (those certified by the Department of Labor under Section 1 of the National Apprenticeship Act). Costs include fees, books, supplies and required equipment (e.g., tools for a trade).
- Student loan repayment. Qualified expenses also include the payment of student loan debt up to $10,000 in a lifetime. However, funds can also be used to pay student loan debt of a beneficiary's siblings (brothers, sisters, stepbrothers, and stepsisters) up to $10,000 each. The portion of student loan interest paid with a 529 distribution is not interest for which a student loan interest deduction (Code §221) can be taken; no double dipping is allowed.
Conclusion
The new rules should be taken into account in preparing 2019 income tax returns for children. They should also be used for planning for the future.
Sidney Kess, CPA-attorney, is of counsel at Kostelanetz & Fink and senior consultant to Citrin Cooperman & Company.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTreasury Issues New Regulations on Allocation of Partnership Liabilities
6 minute readBinding a Successor Town Board; Default on Stipulation of Settlement: This Week in Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest
Trending Stories
- 1Increased Costs Proved a Drag on Profits for PA's AmLaw 200 in 2024
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-81
- 3Mental Health Issues Don’t Get a Holiday
- 4'It's Got to Be a Wake-Up Call:' Atlanta Attorney Hopes $16M Verdict Spurs Training Changes at Hotels
- 5FTC Bans 'Junk Fees' in Live-Event Tickets and Short-Term Lodging
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250