Indicted Brooklyn Judge Says Credit Union Demand for iPhone Violated Fifth Amendment Rights
An attorney for Sylvia Ash, the state Supreme Court judge accused of obstructing an investigation into the state-chartered credit union whose board she used to chair, said Monday that key evidence against her client had been obtained in violation of her Fifth Amendment protections against self-incrimination.
March 23, 2020 at 05:50 PM
4 minute read
An attorney for Sylvia Ash, the state Supreme Court judge accused of obstructing an investigation into the state-chartered credit union whose board she used to chair, said Monday that key evidence against her client had been obtained in violation of her Fifth Amendment protections against self-incrimination.
Carrie Cohen, a Morrison & Foerster partner who is representing Ash in the criminal obstruction case, argued in a court filing that Municipal Credit Union was effectively acting on behalf of federal prosecutors when it told the embattled judge in June 2018 to return the iPhoneX its chief executive had issued her just months before.
At the time, Kam Wong, former CEO of the 500,000-member financial institution, was under federal indictment for stealing nearly $10 million from MCU. Wong later pleaded guilty to the charges and was sentenced to 66 months in prison.
Prosecutors in the Southern District of New York last October charged Ash with trying to cover up Wong's scheme, claiming that she had deleted relevant text messages and lied to investigators looking into Wong's conduct.
Ash, who left the MCU board in August 2016, has pleaded not guilty to the charges in Manhattan federal court, and remains free on $500,000 bond.
On Monday, Cohen said that at the time of MCU's demand for the phone, the credit union was already cooperating with the government's investigation and did not notify Ash that the contents of the phone could be used against her.
"The facts further support that the government, which at the time was in the midst of an investigation regarding financial irregularities, fraud, and embezzlement at the MCU, used its coercive power, including any implied threat that less than total cooperation by the MCU could result in criminal prosecution of it, to cause the MCU to issue the request for electronics to Ms. Ash," Cohen wrote. "This is sufficient to attribute MCU's actions to the state."
The filing asked U.S. District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan of the Southern District of New York to suppress evidence obtained from the cell phone, as well as subsequent search warrants as "fruit of the poisonous tree." In the alternative, she said, the court should approve discovery and an evidentiary hearing to determine the extent of the government's involvement in obtaining the device.
Ash, 62, has served as a New York state judge since 2006. She was elected to the Kings County Supreme Court in 2011 and became presiding judge of the court's commercial division in January 2016. She has been suspended from her post, pending the resolution of her criminal case.
Prosecutors alleged that during her time on MCU's board, Ash reaped "tens of thousands" of dollars in reimbursements and other benefits under Wong's leadership, including airfare, hotels, entertainment and payment for her phone and cable bills, as well as other expenses.
According to the charging documents, she continued to receive Apple devices and other perks from Wong even after she resigned from the MCU board.
Meanwhile, Joseph Guagliardo, a former New York City Police Department officer and former member of MCU's supervisory committee, pleaded guilty in January to stealing more than $400,000 while serving in a leadership role with the nonprofit bank.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readTrump, ABC News Settlement in Defamation Lawsuit Includes $1M in Attorney Fees For President-Elect
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Insurer Not Required to Cover $29M Wrongful Death Judgment, Appeals Court Rules
- 2Slideshow: Jewish Bar Association of Georgia Marks 1st Year With Hanukkah Party
- 3Holland & Knight Launches Export Control Disputes and Advocacy Team
- 4Blake Lively's claims that movie co-star launched smear campaign gets support in publicist's suit
- 5Middle District of Pennsylvania's U.S. Attorney Announces Resignation
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250