Legal Aid Files New Petition for Group Release as Coronavirus Spreads at Rikers Island
The new filing is the latest in a series of efforts by advocates and even some elected officials to free medically vulnerable inmates and those charged with some nonviolent crimes from jails and prisons around the United States.
March 24, 2020 at 06:10 PM
3 minute read
Less than a week after a failed attempt to petition for the release of a group of inmates in New York City jails, New York's Legal Aid Society filed suit Tuesday on behalf of 32 more inmates vulnerable to the coronavirus.
The new filing emphasized the spike in COVID-19 cases at Rikers Island over the weekend and provided more details about each inmate, including, in some cases, the names of jail doctors who have recommended their release.
The new filing is the latest in a series of efforts by advocates and even some elected officials to free medically vulnerable inmates and those charged with some nonviolent crimes from jails and prisons around the United States.
Calls for widespread release in New York grew more pointed in recent days as other states, including New Jersey, announced the release of large groups of inmates.
ACLU-New Jersey, which fought for the New Jersey Supreme Court order releasing low-risk inmates, estimated that it would affect as many as 1,000 inmates.
New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio said in a Tuesday afternoon press conference that he didn't have the authority to release most city jail inmates by himself, but he said about 300 inmates serving short sentences will be immediately released and several hundred more inmates were under review.
In the suit filed Tuesday by Legal Aid, Corey Stoughton, attorney in charge of the Special Litigation Unit of the Legal Aid Society's Criminal Defense Practice, said Legal Aid lawyers are still hearing from some clients in jail who lack access to soap or hand sanitizer.
"There have been shortages of basic cleaning supplies to disinfect housing areas in New York City jails, including housing areas where people with respiratory illnesses are confined," she wrote. On Monday, one lawyer heard from a client who said his dorm had not been cleaned even though several people had been removed from the area after testing positive for the coronavirus.
On Friday, Stoughton filed a petition on behalf of 116 inmates and argued it in court that afternoon. She explained that the petition was rejected because the judge didn't agree that Legal Aid had proved that continuing to hold the inmates constituted deliberate indifference to the risk of serious medical harm under the Fourteenth Amendment.
A spokesman for the New York City Law Department said his office is reviewing Tuesday's filing.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Lawyers: Meet Your New Partner
- 2What Will It Mean in California if New Federal Anti-SLAPP Legislation Passes?
- 3Longtime AOC Director Glenn Grant to Step Down, Assignment Judge to Take Over
- 4Elon Musk’s Tesla Pay Case Stokes Chatter Between Lawyers and Clients
- 5Courts Demonstrate Growing Willingness to Sanction Courtroom Misuse of AI
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250