Manhattan US Judge Blocks Michael Cohen's Bid for Reduced Sentence
Manhattan U.S. District Judge William H. Pauley III called Cohen's latest request to be released from a federal prison camp amid the growing coronavirus outbreak "just another effort to inject himself into the news cycle."
March 24, 2020 at 01:49 PM
3 minute read
A Manhattan federal judge on Tuesday roundly rejected Michael Cohen's months-long effort to reduce his three-year prison sentence for lying to Congress and other crimes, saying it was time for the former attorney and "fixer" to Donald Trump to "accept the consequences of his criminal convictions."
In a two-page order, U.S. District Judge William H. Pauley III of the Southern District of New York criticized Cohen's "ad hominem" attacks against Justice Department officials who denied his pleas for leniency in exchange for information he provided to investigators. And he called Cohen's latest request to be released from a federal prison camp amid the growing coronavirus outbreak "just another effort to inject himself into the news cycle."
The ruling, entered late Tuesday morning, all but ended Cohen's bid to see his sentence reduced to just one year and a day in prison, based on "substantial assistance" he had offered to the Manhattan U.S. Attorney's Office.
His attorney, Roger Bennet Adler, in December claimed that the decision by prosecutors not to recommend a scaled-back prison sentence was the result of widespread bad faith within the DOJ, and asked Pauley to take a "second look" at Cohen's 36-month sentence, which he began serving in May.
Prosecutors, however, responded that Cohen had been less than forthcoming with the information that he had, and even tried to mislead federal investigators in post-sentencing proffer sessions.
On Tuesday, Pauley said that Cohen's "extravagant allegations" against the Justice Department "lack any substance," and refused to revisit his sentencing absent a showing of unconstitutional motives by prosecutors.
"The government acted well-within its discretion in deciding that Cohen's false statements and efforts to minimize his own wrongful conduct justified the government's decision to cease any consideration of a Rule 35(b) application on his behalf," Pauley said. "It is not within this court's purview to review that determination."
Adler did not respond Tuesday to a request for comment.
The ruling also took aim at Cohen's claim last week that he should be allowed to serve out the remainder of his sentence from home in light of the novel coronavirus outbreak, which he said particularly threatened prisoners sharing close quarters in federal facilities.
Pauley, however, sided with prosecutors, who argued Monday that Cohen was "manifestly ineligible" for compassionate release and has not exhausted his administrative remedies.
"That Cohen would seek to single himself out for release to home confinement appears to be just another effort to inject himself into the news cycle," the judge wrote.
He continued: "Ten months into his prison term, it's time that Cohen accept the consequences of his criminal convictions for serious crimes that had far reaching institutional harms."
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readTrump Picks Personal Criminal Defense Lawyers for Solicitor General, Deputy Attorney General
SEC Under Trump 2.0 Likely to Take More 'Measured' Enforcement Approach, Observers Say
Trending Stories
- 1Newsom Names Two Judges to Appellate Courts in San Francisco, Orange County
- 2Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
- 3UN Treaty Enacting Cybercrime Standards Likely to Face Headwinds in US, Other Countries
- 4Clark Hill Acquires L&E Boutique in Mexico City, Adding 5 Lawyers
- 56th Circuit Judges Spar Over Constitutionality of Ohio’s Ballot Initiative Procedures
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250