Manhattan US Judge Blocks Michael Cohen's Bid for Reduced Sentence
Manhattan U.S. District Judge William H. Pauley III called Cohen's latest request to be released from a federal prison camp amid the growing coronavirus outbreak "just another effort to inject himself into the news cycle."
March 24, 2020 at 01:49 PM
3 minute read
A Manhattan federal judge on Tuesday roundly rejected Michael Cohen's months-long effort to reduce his three-year prison sentence for lying to Congress and other crimes, saying it was time for the former attorney and "fixer" to Donald Trump to "accept the consequences of his criminal convictions."
In a two-page order, U.S. District Judge William H. Pauley III of the Southern District of New York criticized Cohen's "ad hominem" attacks against Justice Department officials who denied his pleas for leniency in exchange for information he provided to investigators. And he called Cohen's latest request to be released from a federal prison camp amid the growing coronavirus outbreak "just another effort to inject himself into the news cycle."
The ruling, entered late Tuesday morning, all but ended Cohen's bid to see his sentence reduced to just one year and a day in prison, based on "substantial assistance" he had offered to the Manhattan U.S. Attorney's Office.
His attorney, Roger Bennet Adler, in December claimed that the decision by prosecutors not to recommend a scaled-back prison sentence was the result of widespread bad faith within the DOJ, and asked Pauley to take a "second look" at Cohen's 36-month sentence, which he began serving in May.
Prosecutors, however, responded that Cohen had been less than forthcoming with the information that he had, and even tried to mislead federal investigators in post-sentencing proffer sessions.
On Tuesday, Pauley said that Cohen's "extravagant allegations" against the Justice Department "lack any substance," and refused to revisit his sentencing absent a showing of unconstitutional motives by prosecutors.
"The government acted well-within its discretion in deciding that Cohen's false statements and efforts to minimize his own wrongful conduct justified the government's decision to cease any consideration of a Rule 35(b) application on his behalf," Pauley said. "It is not within this court's purview to review that determination."
Adler did not respond Tuesday to a request for comment.
The ruling also took aim at Cohen's claim last week that he should be allowed to serve out the remainder of his sentence from home in light of the novel coronavirus outbreak, which he said particularly threatened prisoners sharing close quarters in federal facilities.
Pauley, however, sided with prosecutors, who argued Monday that Cohen was "manifestly ineligible" for compassionate release and has not exhausted his administrative remedies.
"That Cohen would seek to single himself out for release to home confinement appears to be just another effort to inject himself into the news cycle," the judge wrote.
He continued: "Ten months into his prison term, it's time that Cohen accept the consequences of his criminal convictions for serious crimes that had far reaching institutional harms."
Read More:
SDNY Prosecutors Oppose Michael Cohen's Release Amid Coronavirus Outbreak
Cohen Attorneys Ask for Sentence Reduction, Citing Lack of Good Faith by Prosecutors
Manhattan Federal Judge Orders Release of Unredacted Michael Cohen Search Warrants
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPrivate Equity Giant KKR Refiles SDNY Countersuit in DOJ Premerger Filing Row
3 minute readSkadden and Steptoe, Defending Amex GBT, Blasts Biden DOJ's Antitrust Lawsuit Over Merger Proposal
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Retrial Bid by Ex-U.S. Sen. Menendez Over Evidentiary Error
- 2Lawyers: Meet Your New Partner
- 3What Will It Mean in California if New Federal Anti-SLAPP Legislation Passes?
- 4Longtime AOC Director Glenn Grant to Step Down, Assignment Judge to Take Over
- 5Elon Musk’s Tesla Pay Case Stokes Chatter Between Lawyers and Clients
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250