Pressure Grows to Better Address Bail Applications as COVID-19 Hits NY Federal Jails
"We're going 150 miles per hour here, but we're meeting a lot of resistance," David Patton, executive director of the Federal Defenders said.
March 25, 2020 at 06:11 PM
5 minute read
Federal defenders are expressing increasing frustration over what they see as a failure to adequately address the spread of the novel coronavirus in jails, even as federal lockups in Manhattan and Brooklyn reported their first confirmed cases among inmates.
The federal criminal dockets in recent days have seen an influx of filings from criminal defense attorneys, who argued that crowded and unsanitary conditions at the jails have put their clients at a heightened risk of contracting COVID-19, the potentially deadly respiratory illness caused by the new virus.
The situation, they said, is particularly dangerous for older inmates and those with preexisting health conditions, but also threatened corrections staff and prison health workers, who could contract the coronavirus and spread it to the larger community. Emergency bail applications, however, have been considered on a case-by-case basis, with prosecutors from the Manhattan U.S. Attorney's Office opposing most, if not all, of the requests.
Groups like the Federal Defenders of New York, meanwhile, have been lobbying for a more comprehensive approach to help speed the release of vulnerable inmates, but so far to little effect.
Among the steps floated were the implementation of a system to identify categories of inmates that could be eligible for temporary release based on the nature of their alleged offenses and risk factors, such as age and preexisting medical conditions, as well as a committee of representatives from the courts, the defense bar and U.S. Attorney's Office to more efficiently process requests.
"We're going 150 miles per hour here, but we're meeting a lot of resistance," David Patton, executive director of the Federal Defenders said when contacted by phone Tuesday. "It's slow going, and we're slogging through case by case."
A spokesman for the Manhattan U.S. Attorney's Office on Wednesday declined to comment on its position with regard to bail requests.
Patton, in previous public statements, has described federal jails as "ticking time bombs" that are ill-equipped to handle an outbreak within their walls.
But the situation became more dire Tuesday, as New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo reported that the virus was spreading more quickly than earlier projections had indicated. The outbreak was expected to peak in New York state within 14 to 21 days, he said, rather than in early May, as previously thought.
As of Wednesday, both the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan and the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn reported that inmates had tested for the coronavirus.
The federal Bureau of Prisons, for its part, has suspended social and legal visits at jails and implemented screening protocols for inmates and staff. But attorneys have argued those measures had severely restricted access to their clients and did not go far enough to protect vulnerable inmates.
Some judges, however, have cited the COVID-19 outbreak in written decisions granting inmate's release.
Before MCC had reported its first positive test, U.S. District Judge Alison Nathan of the Southern District of New York on March 19 reversed an earlier decision denying bail to defendant Dante Stephens, who was arrested for possessing a gun while still under supervised release for dealing drugs, saying the "unprecedented and extraordinarily dangerous nature" of the pandemic had already become apparent.
"Although there is not yet a known outbreak among the jail and prison populations, inmates may be at a heightened risk of contracting COVID-19 should an outbreak develop," Nathan wrote.
U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer of the Southern District on the same day stopped short of declaring the jails unsafe for pretrial detention, but did grant bail to another defendant who suffered from a progressive lung disease saying that and other medical conditions placed him at a "substantially heightened risk of dangerous complications should he contract COVID-19 as compared to most other individuals."
Still, many judges in the Southern District have refused granting bail to inmates with a history of violent offense, who may pose a flight risk or threat to public safety.
U.S. District Judge P. Kevin Castle of the Southern District of New York on Wednesday rejected claims from one inmate who claimed his long history of whooping cough exposed him to an increased risk of contracting COVID-19. The defendant, Deejay White, was charged in connection with a violent robbery and faced a 17-year mandatory minimum sentence if convicted.
"The court finds that there is no basis to change the initial determination," he said following a one-hour telephonic hearing.
U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald of the Southern District of New York, in a decision refusing a separate bail application Wednesday, cautioned against granting requests based on overly "general" concerns about the pandemic, saying that "would logically result in the wholesale release of inmates."
"The court does not accept the proposition that such a result is either better for the inmate or for society more broadly," she wrote.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readTrump Picks Personal Criminal Defense Lawyers for Solicitor General, Deputy Attorney General
SEC Under Trump 2.0 Likely to Take More 'Measured' Enforcement Approach, Observers Say
Trending Stories
- 1Attorney Responds to Outten & Golden Managing Partner's Letter on Dropped Client
- 2Attracted to Thompson Hine's Fee Flexibility, Morgan Lewis Litigator Switches Firms in Chicago
- 3Phila. Attorney Hit With 5-Year Suspension for Mismanaging Firm and Mishandling Cases
- 4Simpson Thacher Replenishes London Ranks With Latest Linklaters Defection
- 5Holland & Knight, Akin, Crowell, Barnes and Day Pitney Add to DC Practices
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250