SCJC to New York Judges: Discipline May Follow if Bail Reform Law Is Disregarded
The state's Commission on Judicial Conduct made the comments in its annual report released Wednesday.
March 25, 2020 at 06:24 PM
3 minute read
A New York state disciplinary commission says judges will be asking for punishment if they flout the state's bail law to make a political point.
The New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct made the comments in its annual report released Wednesday.
Last year, state lawmakers approved sweeping changes by eliminating pretrial detention for the wide majority of misdemeanor and nonviolent felony cases. The changes, which went into effect at the beginning of the year, did not ban the practice entirely.
The law remains at the center of a wide-ranging and heated statewide debate over bail, arguments that often pit reform advocates and liberal-leaning Democrats against law enforcement and prosecutors.
The commission does not take a stance on the bail law's efficacy or proposals to change it, according to the report. But, it said judges are obligated to comply and respect the law, despite whatever their individual views on it might be.
A judge who interprets the law in good faith should not worry about punishment "for what may turn out to be legal error that is reversed on appeal," according to the report.
"However, a judge who purposefully fails to abide by the law, e.g. to make a political point or because s/he personally disagrees with the law, invites discipline," the report reads.
The commission went on to cite a case in which the state Court of Appeals upheld a judge's removal for "willfully disregard[ing] the law," among other things, according to the report.
Prosecutors and law enforcement have decried the state's bail law with heated rhetoric, arguing it did not give judges enough discretion over who remained in jail pretrial.
Criminal justice reform advocates argue the old system was unfair to poor people and the law prevents arrestees from languishing in jail pretrial for low-level crimes.
State lawmakers could change to the bail law shortly as they face an approaching April 1 deadline to pass the state budget.
State Senate Democrats have suggested a proposal that would give judges more say over who stays in jail pretrial, but eliminate cash bail in total.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo has indicated he wants changes to the bail law to be included in the state budget.
The annual report from the disciplinary commission says it received 1,944 new complaints last year, the majority of which came from either a criminal defendant or a civil litigant.
The commission also said conduct rules are broken when a judge is convicted of an "alcohol-fueled offense" and the person should expect to be punished.
"The commission's docket seems always to have one or more active inquiries into complaints of public alcohol-fueled misconduct by judges," according to the report.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readEric Adams Trial Set for April as Defense Urges Dismissal of Bribery Count
Major Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trying a Case for Abu Ghraib Detainees Two Decades After Abuse
- 2The Distribution of Dangerous Products Via Online Marketplaces
- 3The Products Liability Case Against Tianeptine: The Deadly ‘Dietary Supplement’ Found at Your Local Store
- 4The Evolving Landscape of Joint and Several Liability in Pa.: A Post-'Spencer' Analysis
- 5A Deep Dive Into the Product-Line Exception in Pennsylvania
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250