Tax Updates Related to the Coronavirus
In his Tax Tips column, Sidney Kess discusses aspects of the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (H.R. 6201), which was signed into law on March 18, 2020 and creates new paid leave payments for employees and new tax credits for small employers. He also addresses other IRS COVID-19 pronouncements of note.
March 25, 2020 at 01:00 PM
8 minute read
The COVID-19 pandemic has not only upended the economy, it is the catalyst for a number of tax changes. The Families First Coronavirus Response Act (H.R. 6201), which was signed into law on March 18, 2020, creates new paid leave payments for employees and new tax credits for small employers. The Joint Committee on Taxation pegs the cost to the government for this relief at over $104 billion. In addition to Congressional action, the IRS has made some COVID-19 pronouncements of note.
|Tax Filing and Payment Deferral
The IRS extended the deadline for filing 2019 returns for individuals and calendar year C corporations that usually is April 15, 2020. The new deadline is July 15, 2020 (Notice 2020-18). Taxpayers do not have to file for an extension unless they want time beyond July 15, 2020. If they want until Oct. 15, 2020, they must request an extension (by using Form 4868 for individuals and Form 7004 for corporations).
The IRS also extended the payment deadline for income taxes due on April 15, 2020, to July 15, 2020 (Notice 2020-17). This extension covers 2019 taxes that are still outstanding on April 15th, as well as 2020 estimated taxes due on April 15. It does not apply to deposits of employment taxes, which continue to be due as scheduled.
Interest, additions to tax, and tax penalties will begin to accrue for unpaid income tax amounts beginning on July 16, 2020. However, taxpayers may request reasonable cause relief from the failure-to-pay penalty (Code §6651) or the failure by corporate taxpayers to pay estimated taxes (Code §6655).
|New Paid Leave
There are two types of paid leave under the new law that apply through 2020: paid sick leave for employees and paid family leave for employees. These benefits must be provided to eligible employees by employers with fewer than 500 employees. Employers with fewer than 50 employees may be exempt from the requirement to provide leave to care for a child whose school is closed or if child care is unavailable if providing the benefit would threaten the viability of the business (the Department of Labor will provide emergency guidance to articulate this standard). Larger employers are not required to provide any paid leave. But as a practical matter, it is common for large employers to offer paid sick leave and many also offer paid family and medical leave.
The following relates to federal tax rules. But there may be state rules to consider. For example, New York enacted a measure to provide sick leave and job protection resulting from the corona quarantine (employers with 10 or fewer employees and a net income of less than $1 million are only required to provide unpaid, but job-protected, sick leave).
Paid sick leave. This is 100% of regular pay (up to a $511 daily limit). Essentially, this replaces the full pay for those earning up to $133,000 a year. Those earning more are receiving a partial pay replacement. This pay is for up to two weeks (a total of 10 days) for an employee who has the coronavirus, is symptomatic and seeking a medical diagnosis for COVID-19, or is self-isolated or quarantined pursuant to instructions from a medical or government authority.
Paid family leave. This is two-thirds of regular pay (up to a $200 daily limit). Essentially, this is a two-thirds replacement for those earning up to $78,000 per year. Those earning more receive less than two-thirds of their regular pay. It is payable for up to 10 weeks for an employee who is caring for an individual who has the virus, is caring for a child who is out of school (under age 18) or without day care, or is experiencing any substantially similar condition to be specified by the Department of Health and Human Services in consultation with the IRS and Department of Labor. Paid family leave is only for someone unable to work, meaning those who can telework are not eligible for the benefit. The first two weeks (10 days) of family leave does not have to be paid, although employees can use their accrued leave time to cover their needs during this period. Then the 10 weeks of paid leave kicks in.
Employer tax credit. The credit is a dollar for dollar reduction of certain employer employment tax liability for paid sick or family leave associated with COVID-19 up to set limits (explained below). More specifically, the employer credit is an offset to the employer share of the Social Security portion of FICA. Employers that were already offering these benefits can still claim the tax credit (subject to the daily caps on employee paid benefits).
- The maximum number of days taken into account for any calendar quarter cannot exceed 10 over the aggregate number of days taken into account in the preceding quarters (i.e., only 10 days in total for the year).
- The maximum amount taken into account for the credit with respect to paid family leave wages cannot exceed $10,000 per employee for any calendar quarter. If the amount of the credit exceeds the tax in any calendar quarter, it is treated as an overpayment that can be refunded to the employer.
Employers can retain funds that would otherwise be used for payroll taxes with respect to the paid leave in order to have the money needed for the paid leave. For example, if an employer paid $5,000 in sick leave and is otherwise required to deposit $8,000 in payroll taxes (including amounts withheld from employees), the employer could use up to $5,000 to pay the sick leave and deposit only $3,000 on the next regular deposit date. If these funds are insufficient, employers will be able to seek an expedited advance from the IRS by submitting a streamlined claim form (expected to be released very soon). For example, if the employer paid $10,000 in sick leave and was required to deposit $8,000 in payroll taxes, the employer could use all of the $8,000 to make the required sick leave payments and request an accelerated credit for the remaining $2,000.
Self-employed individuals. An self-employed individual, who is not an employee eligible for paid sick or family leave, can take a refundable income tax credit equivalent to the leave amount. An eligible self-employed individual is a person who regularly carries on a trade or business and would be entitled to receive paid leave if he or she were an employee.
- The credit for the sick leave equivalent amount is the number of days the self-employed person is unable to perform services in the trade or business (no more than the number of days applicable to employees) multiplied by the lesser of the amounts applicable for employees (either the $511 cap or the $200 cap, depending on the reason for not working) or 67% (100% for sick leave) of the average daily self-employment income of the individual for the tax year. This is the net earnings from self-employment for the year divided by 260.
- The credit for the paid family leave is a qualified family leave equivalent amount for the number of days (not to exceed 50) that the person is unable to perform services in a trade or business, multiplied by the lesser of 67% of the average daily self-employment income or $200.
The self-employed individual must maintain documentation to support the credit. The IRS guidance on this is expected to be issued.
The self-employed person cannot get a double benefit. So, if he or she also has a job from which paid leave is provided, no tax credit related to self-employment can also be claimed.
|High Deductible Health Plans
A high-deductible health plan (HDHP) is a prerequisite to funding a health savings account (HSA). An HDHP is health coverage with a minimum deductible and maximum out-of-pocket limit for self-only and family polices, which is fixed annually by the IRS. In general, the HDHP cannot cover medical expenses until the deductible under the policy has been exhausted. However, certain preventive care treatments are excepted from this requirement.
In light of COVID-19, the IRS has made it clear that testing and treatment for COVID-19 can be paid without a deductible and won't disqualify the insurance as an HDHP. This will allow those covered by the HDHP to make tax-deductible contributions to their HSA even if their insurance provides virus-related benefits before they've used up their insurance deductible.
|IRS Updates
The IRS has created a Coronavirus Tax Relief center to provide updates on virus-related tax changes.
|Conclusion
The IRS has provided only preliminary information regarding the new paid leave provisions (IR-2020-57). With the spread of the virus and the continued severity in the marketplace, expect to see additional tax changes from Congress and the IRS very soon. This is only the beginning.
Sidney Kess, CPA-attorney, is of counsel at Kostelanetz & Fink and senior consultant to Citrin Cooperman & Company.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTreasury Issues New Regulations on Allocation of Partnership Liabilities
6 minute readBinding a Successor Town Board; Default on Stipulation of Settlement: This Week in Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest
Trending Stories
- 1Increased Costs Proved a Drag on Profits for PA's AmLaw 200 in 2024
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-81
- 3Mental Health Issues Don’t Get a Holiday
- 4'It's Got to Be a Wake-Up Call:' Atlanta Attorney Hopes $16M Verdict Spurs Training Changes at Hotels
- 5FTC Bans 'Junk Fees' in Live-Event Tickets and Short-Term Lodging
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250