No Bar Exam? That's What 1,000 Law Students Want NY to Declare Amid COVID-19
A state bar task force is considering an emergency diploma privilege for third-year law students—an approach endorsed by more than 1,000 current students.
March 26, 2020 at 02:37 PM
5 minute read
More than 1,000 students have signed a letter requesting a diploma privilege system in New York that would allow them to practice without sitting for the July bar exam—which is looking increasingly unlikely to take place as planned due to the COVID-19 outbreak.
The letter, sent Thursday to the New York State Bar Association's Task Force on the New York Bar Examination, argues that an emergency diploma privilege is the most effective way to ensure the flow of new lawyers into the profession who can help alleviate access to justice issues. Moreover, the letter says that quick adoption of an emergency diploma privilege system would help to ameliorate the stress and anxiety third-year law students are feeling about their career prospects.
"We believe that an emergency diploma privilege would best rectify any COVID-19 related inequities in the administration of the [New York Bar Exam] for the class of 2020, without compromising the quality of attorneys licensed in New York State," reads the letter, which notes that law students will have differing abilities to study for the bar—should it take place—depending on their personal health and family circumstances.
Students from all 15 New York law schools have signed the letter—in less than 48 hours of circulating—as have students from 63 other law schools who plan to take the bar and work in the Empire State. More than 10,000 people typically take the July bar exam in New York.
Leslie Ann Caraballo, a third-year student at the City University of New York School of Law, said Thursday that she signed the letter because she and her classmates need some clarity about their professional future at a time of overwhelming uncertainty.
"We're pretty much in limbo right now," she said. "There is so much that's unknown about what the next year will look like in terms of work and post-graduate life. And then there is the idea that we could be held up [by the bar exam.] It feels like the finish line has been moved for us."
The state bar announced Monday that its bar exam task force is meeting on an emergency basis to make recommendations to the state court system on how to handle the July attorney licensing test. The court will ultimately decide what to do. State Bar president Henry Greenberg said in an interview Thursday that an emergency diploma privilege is among the approaches the task force will discuss. (Its first emergency meeting was slated to take place Thursday.) The task force will also consider postponing the exam or delivering the exam in an online format. Greenberg said that any decision by New York on how to handle the bar exam may well prompt other jurisdictions to follow suit.
"They understand that the need to formulate recommendations is urgent, and time is of the essence," Greenberg said of the task force. "They're going to work very quickly and will consider a range of options. We are laser-like focused on the needs of graduating law students right now. They are going through—in real-time—a life crisis."
Extending an emergency diploma privilege to 2020 law grads is among the ideas floated in a recent paper by 11 legal academics and education policy experts that urged jurisdictions to make fast decisions about the July test. Postponing the test isn't a great option since we don't know when the pandemic will subside, they argue, and offering it online opens up issues of security, the authors noted. But versions of a diploma privilege, which Wisconsin has long offered to graduates of its two law schools and enables them to practice in the state without ever sitting for the exam, could work well under current circumstances, as could a system whereby recent graduates are allowed to practice under the close supervision of a licensed attorney.
The National Conference of Bar Examiners, which develops the bar exam, has warned against making quick decisions about the test and has urged thorough deliberation on the matter.
The law student letter notes that 86% of first-time bar takers from American Bar Association-accredited law schools passed the test on their first try in July of 2019. And the state should consider extending an emergency diploma privilege to graduates of ABA-accredited law schools outside of New York, it says. Such a move would not compromise the quality of the state's new lawyers given the relatively high pass rate of that cohort of students, it notes. The letter makes clear that the fate of bar exam is weighing heavily upon them.
"We understand the importance of the bar examination as a method for measuring legal competencies," it reads. "However, we do not believe that our careers should be put on hold in these circumstances. We must begin the hard work of rebuilding the lives of our friends, families, and neighbors through upholding the rule of law and fighting for justice."
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
'No Evidence'?: Big Law Firms Defend Academic Publishers in EDNY Antitrust Case
3 minute read'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readLippman Study on Antisemitism at CUNY Weighs Free Speech, Unprotected Acts
Trending Stories
- 1Lawyer’s Resolutions: Focusing on 2025
- 2Houston Judge Exonerated on Appeal, Public Reprimand Vacated
- 3Bar Report - Dec. 30
- 4Employment Law Developments to Expect From the Second Trump Administration
- 5How I Made Law Firm Leadership: 'It’s Imperative That You Never Stop Learning,' Says Ian Ribald of Ballard Spahr
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.