New York Bail Reform Status Up in the Air as Lawmakers Face Budget Deadline
Gov. Andrew Cuomo said he wants to tweak the law, but those suggestions have run into stiff opposition from Assembly Democrats, who have urged legislative leaders to resist amending the law as New York remains in the throes of the COVID-19 pandemic.
March 30, 2020 at 11:27 AM
6 minute read
As lawmakers face a fast-approaching deadline to pass the state budget, it remains uncertain whether the New York State Legislature will change a landmark law overhauling the state's bail rules that came into effect at the beginning of 2020.
The April 1 budget deadline forces a confrontation between law enforcement agencies and more moderate legislators on one side and lawmakers who say the measure needs to be given a chance to work.
The law eliminated pretrial detention for the wide majority of misdemeanors and nonviolent felonies.
Despite the intensity of the bail debate, the coronavirus outbreak in New York dried up legislative agendas and swiftly seized the attention of state lawmakers. As the budget deadline looms, the focus of legislators has now shifted toward dealing with the coronavirus pandemic.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo drew a line in the sand on the issue last month, saying he will not approve a budget without changes to the law. He appeared to double down on that position earlier this month and said the issue "will be concluded in the budget."
New York's state budget is often used to push through large-scale policy proposals.
But two prominent law enforcement organizations Monday called on the Legislature to put aside major policy changes in light of the coronavirus outbreak.
"Adopting radical changes in public policy by pretending it is 'budget-related' is a sham, and never the right thing to do, but especially this year," said Washington County Sheriff Jeff Murphy. He is president of the New York State Sheriffs' Association.
The other organization, New York State Association of Chiefs of Police, was critical of the bail law and pushed for changes. But their president, Greece Police Chief Patrick Phelan, said Monday that they would prefer amendments be done in a calm and deliberative process once the crisis has diminished.
Cuomo and moderate Democrats in the state Senate want to make changes to the bail law, but those suggestions have run into stiff opposition from Assembly Democrats.
But dozens of Democrats, primarily in the Assembly, have urged legislative leaders to resist amending the law as New York remains in the throes of the COVID-19 pandemic. They argue that rolling back the bail reforms would put more people in jail, threatening to exacerbate the spread of the coronavirus.
Some lawmakers said jails are a dangerous incubator for the coronavirus, particularly because of close living quarters and limited access to soap and hand-washing facilities.
"We cannot allow large sums of people to once again be stuck in the pre-trial phase," said Assemblyman Victor Pichardo, D-Bronx, in a statement. "This would put more people at risk of COVID-19, in turn clogging up our overburdened hospitals."
Democrats in the state Senate have suggested a proposal that would completely eliminate cash bail, but in exchange give the court more power over who stays in jail pretrial. Last year's changes did not ban the practice of cash bail entirely.
Advocates have lambasted that proposal and argue that providing judges with more discretion would lead to racial disparities.
Their plan would also amend a law passed last year that requires prosecutors to provide discovery information within a 15-day time period after arraignment. The proposal would extend the deadline in an effort to give district attorneys more time to comply with the requirement.
Cuomo indicated support for giving judges more discretion over pretrial detention, but has not publicly supported the state Senate plan.
Earlier this year, Chief Judge Janet DiFiore signaled her support for giving judges more discretion, saying the current law does not allow judges to consider whether arrestees are dangerous to other people. She acknowledged the system's historic overreliance on bail, but said the criminal justice system must balance defendants' rights with protecting crime victims.
"That goal cannot be accomplished if judges are rendered powerless to devise the best securing orders for those very few individuals who have been shown to pose a credible risk of danger," she said.
Meanwhile, Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie, D-Bronx, has repeatedly pushed back against calls to change the law.
Earlier this month, Heastie said he is open to looking at concerns about the law, but emphasized his conference's overall position on the issue has not changed and his members do not want to implement a bail system that provides total judicial discretion.
"The foundation of what we did, we think was the correct and right way to do things," he told reporters.
Before the coronavirus derailed the legislative session and seized the attention of local and state leaders, the bail law had been perhaps the most intense debate among New York lawmakers this session.
The law drew a flood of media attention, large-scale rallies and heated rhetoric from rival sides of the issue.
Supporters of the law argued the changes help prevent poor arrestees from languishing in jail for minor offenses as their cases work through the criminal justice system. The old system was unfair and allowed rich defendants to remain out of custody pretrial, they said.
Law enforcement authorities and prosecutors decried the law, arguing it jeopardized public safety and did not give judges enough say over who remained in jail pretrial. Law enforcement also raised concerns about charges that would not be eligible for bail, such as third-degree assault as a hate crime.
Republicans in the state Senate angled to campaign on the firestorm over the bail issue. But their conference was dealt a significant blow this month when the state Senate Minority Leader John Flanagan, R-Suffolk, announced he would not seek reelection.
READ MORE:
DiFiore Backs Bail Reform Law Tweak, Court Reorganization in State of Judiciary Speech
Upstate Judge Sets Aside NY Bail Reform Law as Unconstitutional in Misdemeanor Case
More Funding Needed for Pretrial Services Ahead of NY Bail Reform, Supporters Say
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readHochul Vetoes 'Grieving Families' Bill, Faulting a Lack of Changes to Suit Her Concerns
Trending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250