As Lawyers Adapt to 'NY on PAUSE', State Court System Expands Virtual Operations
New York's Chief Judge Janet DiFiore says a significant number of judges, court officers and other workers have been infected with the virus.
March 31, 2020 at 04:21 PM
5 minute read
New York state's court system says it expanded virtual court operations Monday as the state remains at the epicenter of a coronavirus pandemic.
New York's Chief Judge Janet DiFiore announced the expansion in a video address posted online Monday evening, saying a significant number of judges, court officers and other workers have been infected with the virus.
DiFiore's message came as attorneys entered the second week under Gov. Andrew Cuomo's "New York on PAUSE" executive order, which included a directive that in-office personnel functions move out of the workplace except for "essential" businesses. As Cuomo's order left legal services off the list of "essential" businesses, court officials repeatedly limited functions that had to take place in courthouses.
When it was formulated, some lawyers were unsure about the line between "essential" and "nonessential" services under the order, but many who spoke with the Law Journal said they had found a new equilibrium. The court system for its part reduced to nearly zero court appearances that had to happen in person.
DiFiore reported the court system is going virtual in Suffolk County and the fifth judicial district in central New York, along with the seventh judicial district that covers Rochester. She reported the court system plans to have all judicial districts outside New York City operating virtually by the end of next week "to handle essential and emergency matters."
The state court system has already postponed all "nonessential" services. Lawrence Marks, the state's chief administrative judge, previously issued an order listing which topics are considered "essential" matters, which includes bail applications, temporary orders of protection and applications tied to "serious code violations."
Eviction proceedings and pending eviction orders have also been suspended statewide, according to the court system.
The court system's announcement is in line with pleas from public officials, who have urged people to stay home and in general avoid close in-person interactions that can help spread the virus.
"New York state and New York City are the epicenter of the coronavirus outbreak," DiFiore said in the video. "While the expert consensus is that the number of infected individuals will continue to rise, we are committed to keeping our courts open to hear essential and emergency matters."
Lawyers have acknowledged the seriousness of the coronavirus, but say the court system largely "shutdown" court operations.
New York's economy continues to be engulfed by the coronavirus. In an effort to slow the virus' spread, the state ordered all nonessential workers to stay home and issued sweeping rules that sharply curtailed gatherings of any kind.
Some law firms have transitioned to working remotely in light of the coronavirus.
Robert Schofield, a co-managing partner at Whiteman Osterman & Hanna, said the firm did not want to put employees at risk unnecessarily by sending them into the office.
Some attorneys have expressed concerns that the economic upheaval and a slowing of the legal operations will eventually hit their law firms.
"A lot of our firms are going to be significantly impacted by this crisis," said James O'Connor, president of the Defense Association of New York, commenting on smaller legal firms. It would be heart-wrenching, he said, to let go of outstanding employees who haven't done anything wrong.
Moving legal activities from an in-person system to a remote operation will be crucial to blunting a financial downturn for law firms, he said. That could mean things like conducting a deposition through a video conference, instead of an in-person meeting where people are gathered in a conference room, he said.
Jaimie Nawaday, chair of Kelley Drye & Warren's white-collar, investigations and compliance practice, said work with most of the firm's work continued, albeit remotely. Kelley Drye, like most firms, had switched to videoconferencing to meet with clients, and had even started hosting a "virtual happy hour" to help its attorneys keep in touch from home.
"They are making an effort to reach out and stay in touch," she said.
The firm's CLE and litigation groups remained particularly busy, and lawyers were getting regular updates from managing partners and other firm leadership, she said.
Mintz & Gold, another Manhattan firm, was also largely working from home and arranging meetings remotely using Zoom, according to Charles Ross, a partner in the firm.
Tom McParland contributed to this story.
READ MORE:
Definition of 'Essential' Court Services in COVID-19 Response Begins to Come Into Focus
As Cuomo Imposes '100% Workforce Reduction,' Law Firms Wrestle With Details
Freeze in Most Civil Filings Brings Concern, Frustration for New York Litigators
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCaught In the In Between: A Legal Roadmap for the Sandwich Generation
8 minute readGift and Estate Tax Opportunities and Potential Traps in 2025 for Our New York High Net Worth Clients
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1SDNY Criminal Division Deputy Chief Returns to Debevoise
- 2Brownstein Adds Former Interior Secretary, Offering 'Strategic Counsel' During New Trump Term
- 3Tragedy on I-95: Florida Lawsuit Against Horizon Freight System Could Set New Precedent in Crash Cases
- 4Weil, Loading Up on More Regulatory Talent, Adds SEC Asset Management Co-Chief
- 5Big Banks Did Great Last Year. What Does That Mean for Big Law?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250