Federal Judge Orders NY State Officials to Produce Documents in NRA Lawsuit
The NRA alleges that New York improperly discouraged banks and insurers from doing business with the organization because of its exercise of free speech and positions on the Second Amendment.
April 01, 2020 at 06:35 PM
3 minute read
A federal judge granted an appeal from the National Rifle Association Tuesday, ordering that Gov. Andrew Cuomo and the New York Department of Financial Services must produce documents in a lawsuit by the gun-rights group against state officials.
The documents will be reviewed in camera by U.S. Magistrate Judge Christian Hummel and an appointed special master, Senior District Judge Thomas McAvoy of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York decided.
The NRA appealed the magistrate judge's ruling after he decided that some categories of documents were not relevant to discovery in the case, which is based on the legal theory that New York improperly discouraged banks and insurers from doing business with the NRA because of its exercise of free speech and positions on the Second Amendment.
McAvoy found that the NRA's quest for discovery has some resemblance to the classic "fishing expedition" disallowed by law, but he nevertheless disagreed with Hummel because relevance in the context of discovery is broad, he wrote.
He added that the case involves "unique circumstances" because the NRA has a pending motion to reintroduce its claim that the state engaged in selective enforcement, which might make the sought-after categories more relevant.
"Here, although Plaintiff's speculation that relevant documents exist sounds of an improper fishing expedition, and although it raises relevancy in connection with a qualified immunity defense that was not presented to Magistrate Judge Hummel, the possibility that relevant documents exist compels the Court to conclude that over-production of documents rather than under-production is the proper course to follow," McAvoy wrote.
William Brewer, a partner at Brewer, Attorneys & Counselors and lead attorney for the NRA, said he's glad that discovery can move forward after what he described as a prolonged delay.
In the first day after McAvoy's decision was filed, Brewer said his team began contacting third parties who may have relevant documents.
"We've now already begun contacting each of them in turn, supplying them with the ruling and saying Judge McAvoy disagrees, obviously those communications you had with the defendants relative to the NRA during this key period of time are relevant to our claims, please turn them over," he said. "And we hope that we'll see a different level of cooperation and then we can go forward and start scheduling depositions when we all get to the other side of this very difficult time we're all going through."
He said he believes discovery can move forward electronically while people are dispersed due to the coronavirus. By July, when Brewer hopes to begin depositions, he said he hopes that life will have begun returning to normal.
A spokeswoman for the Department of Financial Services said the agency is reviewing McAvoy's decision.
"We strongly disagree with the NRA's continued use of abusive discovery demands in its baseless lawsuit," the spokeswoman said.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCourt System Names New Administrative Judges for New York City Courts in Leadership Shakeup
3 minute readRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250