Rakoff Tosses Fraud Suit by Fantasy Sports Players Over MLB Sign-Stealing Scandal
U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff said that the plaintiffs' "verbose, rhetorical, and largely conclusory complaint" had failed to make out that the league owed gamblers a duty to take additional action to prevent player misconduct.
April 03, 2020 at 03:01 PM
3 minute read
Manhattan U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff ruled Friday that fantasy sports players could not sue Major League Baseball for fraud over the sign-stealing scandal that has rocked the sport.
The decision by Rakoff, judge from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, came as a win for MLB and two teams at the center of the controversy, as play across the league had been suspended indefinitely due to the mounting coronavirus crisis.
While Rakoff acknowledged that the Houston Astros and Boston Red Sox had "shamelessly" violated MLB's prohibition against using electronic equipment to lift opposing teams' signals, the claims against the league and its teams were "simply too attenuated" to support the lawsuit.
"But did the initial efforts of those teams, and supposedly of Major League Baseball itself, to conceal these foul deeds from the simple sports bettors who wagered on fantasy baseball create a cognizable legal claim?" Rakoff asked in his 32-page opinion. "On the allegations here made, the answer is no."
A group of DraftKings players had accused MLB of promoting fantasy baseball competitions that it knew were "corrupt and dishonest," saying they never would have wagered on the contests had they known that player statistics were being skewed.
An MLB investigation found that the Astros had improperly used an outfield camera system to steal signs from opposing teams' pitchers in the 2017 and 2018 seasons. The league fined the team $5 million, banned its manager and general manager for one year, and stripped the club of its first- and second-round draft picks for the next two seasons. A disciplinary decision with regard to the Red Sox is still pending.
But attorneys for MLB and the two teams argued that fans had no right to sue over conduct that the league had specifically outlawed.
In a colorful opinion that cited the league's checkered history of high-profile scandals, Rakoff said that the plaintiffs' "verbose, rhetorical, and largely conclusory complaint" had failed to make out that the league owed gamblers a duty to take additional action to prevent player misconduct.
"A sport that celebrates 'stealing,' even if only of a base, may not provide the perfect encouragement to scrupulous play," Rakoff, a professed New York Yankees fan, wrote. "Nor can it be denied that an overweening desire to win may sometimes lead our heroes to employ forbidden substances on their (spit) balls, their (corked) bats, or even their (steroid-consuming) selves."
"But," he said, "as Frank Sinatra famously said to Grace Kelly (in the 1956 movie musical High Society), 'there are rules about such things.'"
Read More:
Appeals Court Holds Daily Fantasy Sports Contests Illegal Gambling in NY
Foes Seek End to Daily Fantasy Sports, Operating in NY Under Injunction
State Supreme Court Justice Strikes Down NY Daily Fantasy Sports Law
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWalt Disney, IBM Denied High Court Review of Old NY Franchise Tax Law
3 minute readThe Met Hires GC of Elite University as Next Legal Chief
Just Ahead of Oral Argument, Fubo Settles Antitrust Case with Disney, Fox, Warner Bros.
Trending Stories
- 1Day Pitney Announces Partner Elevations
- 2The New Rules of AI: Part 2—Designing and Implementing Governance Programs
- 3Plaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
- 4As Litigation Finance Industry Matures, Links With Insurance Tighten
- 5The Gold Standard: Remembering Judge Jeffrey Alker Meyer
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250