Rakoff Tosses Fraud Suit by Fantasy Sports Players Over MLB Sign-Stealing Scandal
U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff said that the plaintiffs' "verbose, rhetorical, and largely conclusory complaint" had failed to make out that the league owed gamblers a duty to take additional action to prevent player misconduct.
April 03, 2020 at 03:01 PM
3 minute read
Manhattan U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff ruled Friday that fantasy sports players could not sue Major League Baseball for fraud over the sign-stealing scandal that has rocked the sport.
The decision by Rakoff, judge from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, came as a win for MLB and two teams at the center of the controversy, as play across the league had been suspended indefinitely due to the mounting coronavirus crisis.
While Rakoff acknowledged that the Houston Astros and Boston Red Sox had "shamelessly" violated MLB's prohibition against using electronic equipment to lift opposing teams' signals, the claims against the league and its teams were "simply too attenuated" to support the lawsuit.
"But did the initial efforts of those teams, and supposedly of Major League Baseball itself, to conceal these foul deeds from the simple sports bettors who wagered on fantasy baseball create a cognizable legal claim?" Rakoff asked in his 32-page opinion. "On the allegations here made, the answer is no."
A group of DraftKings players had accused MLB of promoting fantasy baseball competitions that it knew were "corrupt and dishonest," saying they never would have wagered on the contests had they known that player statistics were being skewed.
An MLB investigation found that the Astros had improperly used an outfield camera system to steal signs from opposing teams' pitchers in the 2017 and 2018 seasons. The league fined the team $5 million, banned its manager and general manager for one year, and stripped the club of its first- and second-round draft picks for the next two seasons. A disciplinary decision with regard to the Red Sox is still pending.
But attorneys for MLB and the two teams argued that fans had no right to sue over conduct that the league had specifically outlawed.
In a colorful opinion that cited the league's checkered history of high-profile scandals, Rakoff said that the plaintiffs' "verbose, rhetorical, and largely conclusory complaint" had failed to make out that the league owed gamblers a duty to take additional action to prevent player misconduct.
"A sport that celebrates 'stealing,' even if only of a base, may not provide the perfect encouragement to scrupulous play," Rakoff, a professed New York Yankees fan, wrote. "Nor can it be denied that an overweening desire to win may sometimes lead our heroes to employ forbidden substances on their (spit) balls, their (corked) bats, or even their (steroid-consuming) selves."
"But," he said, "as Frank Sinatra famously said to Grace Kelly (in the 1956 movie musical High Society), 'there are rules about such things.'"
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Uncertainty Hovers Over PGA Merger, LIV Golf Hires Entertainment Industry Veteran as Legal Chief
'Rampant Piracy': US Record Labels File Copyright Suit Against French Distributor Believe
5 minute read'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How to Support Law Firm Profitability: Train Partners Up
- 2Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 3Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 4Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 5X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250