Discovery in Federal Habeas Case Could Send Medical Inspector Into Brooklyn Lockup, Lawyers Say
As the Metropolitan Detention Center restricts physical visits, the inspection could provide a rare window into conditions at the facility during a time when advocates describe it as more opaque than usual.
April 08, 2020 at 07:02 PM
4 minute read
As discovery begins in a federal suit involving conditions related to the treatment and spread of COVID-19 at Brooklyn's Metropolitan Detention Center, lawyers representing a group of inmates will seek to send a medical inspector into the facility, they said during a telephone conference Wednesday afternoon.
The medical inspector could provide a rare window into conditions at the facility during a time when advocates describe it as more opaque than usual. Physical visits have been entirely shut down due to the coronavirus, and the Federal Defenders of New York report that family members and lawyers themselves have struggled to maintain contact with people inside the facility.
Katherine Rosenfeld of Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady, which is representing four MDC inmates alongside lawyers from Cardozo School of Law's Civil Rights Clinic, said the team will serve government attorneys representing MDC Warden Derek Edge with discovery demands as early as tomorrow.
They're interested in learning more about how the facility is handling the coronavirus, including how many people are suffering from symptoms, Rosenfeld said. The discovery demands will include a notice of inspection for a correctional health expert to visit the MDC, she said.
"We're not attempting to waste anybody's time at all, but there is very basic information that's solely in the hands of the BOP, and that includes what exactly is going on in the facility and whether there is the massive undertesting and underreporting that we believe is the case," Rosenfeld said.
Only a few inmates at the MDC have tested positive for the virus, according to official reports. Rosenfeld said the low number is a "sign of a problem," not a sign that the facility has mostly avoided the illness sweeping the globe.
U.S. District Judge Rachel Kovner of the Eastern District of New York denied the plaintiffs' requests for a temporary restraining order and the appointment of a special master, saying it would be very unusual to appoint a special master so early in a case.
She said she didn't want to eliminate the possibility of appointing a special master later, though, and encouraged the parties to move ahead with scheduling a preliminary injunction hearing in the proposed class action suit, which is captioned Chunn v. Edge.
Assistant U.S. Attorney James Cho said progress in the case is ongoing, because two of the four named plaintiffs have either been released or are about to be released, and the other two plaintiffs' requests for compassionate release are still moving forward with the judges who handled their criminal cases.
Rosenfeld emphasized that the government is opposing the release of the two remaining inmates, and the ongoing issues at the MDC affect others, too.
"We would be thrilled, of course, if all four petitioners are released over the government's objections," she said. "There's a long line of other people, unfortunately, who also have health problems, who also are there being held in unconstitutional conditions of confinement, so we don't anticipate a situation where the issues in this case are going to be made moot by the … slow trickle of opposed releases that are happening."
Rosenfeld and her colleagues objected strongly after Cho mentioned that officials had interacted directly with the two men sometime Wednesday, without defense attorneys present.
The Federal Defenders of New York have raised objections for weeks about the lack of legal calls available to federal inmates amid the pandemic. Another case addressing that issue is currently moving forward in the Eastern District of New York.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readTrump Picks Personal Criminal Defense Lawyers for Solicitor General, Deputy Attorney General
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250