New York Lawmakers Aim for Further Tenant Protections Amid COVID Outbreak
The measure would prevent landlords from evicting tenants for not paying rent that accumulates during the state's declared disaster emergency and during a six-month window after the end of the emergency.
April 08, 2020 at 05:46 PM
3 minute read
Some state lawmakers are aiming to bolster tenant protections as New York remains in the throes of a coronavirus pandemic that has killed thousands of people statewide.
The measure would prevent landlords from evicting tenants for not paying rent that accumulates during the state's declared disaster emergency and during a six-month window after the end of the emergency.
The proposal is backed by Sen. Liz Krueger and the chairs of the judiciary committees in both legislative chambers—Assemblymember Jeffrey Dinowitz and Sen. Brad Hoylman.
Efforts to slow the spread of the coronavirus have upended New York's economy, shuttering businesses across the state and wreaking financial havoc for certain industries. New York state has issued orders requiring all nonessential workers to stay home, along with other restrictions that sharply curtail gatherings.
"The COVID-19 pandemic, and the associated economic crisis it has caused, have created the potential for widespread evictions beyond anything our state has seen since the Great Depression," Krueger said in a statement.
New York declared a state disaster emergency March 7.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo said Wednesday the state saw its highest single-day death toll, with 779 new deaths tied to the coronavirus. There are more than 6,200 deaths tied to the virus in New York and upward of 149,000 people have been infected statewide, according to state figures.
Cuomo last month signed an executive order issuing a 90-day moratorium on the eviction of any residential or commercial tenant, along with the foreclosure of residential or commercial properties.
The third-term Democrat issued the order by taking advantage of his expanded executive power, which state lawmakers afforded him through a legislative bill earlier this year. The move allows the governor to issue directives during a state of emergency, instead of simply suspending laws that might impede the response to an emergency disaster, according to legal experts.
Hoylman's office says tenants who cannot pay rent might face evictions after the 90 days. Hoylman, a Manhattan Democrat, said in a statement that the executive order is a good first step, but more is needed. Under the legislation, his office says landlords would be able to seek "money judgments" for rent that has not been paid.
"Unless we act, we'll see a tidal wave of evictions immediately after the moratorium ends," he said in a statement.
Dinowitz issued a similar warning as well, saying in a statement that the 90-day eviction moratorium is a "ticking time bomb" for tenants who have lost all income, particularly if they have significant expenses.
"I urge all legislators to unite behind this proposal to ensure tenants' safe harbor during this pandemic," he said in a statement.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEric Adams Trial Set for April as Defense Urges Dismissal of Bribery Count
Decision of the Day: De Blasio Must Sit for Deposition in Suit Over City Program to Transfer Foreclosed Properties
The Legislature Has Enacted Landmark Criminal Justice Reforms. Now It Should Take Steps to Improve the System
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
- 5Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250