28 People Released From NYC Jails Waited 'In Limbo' After State Transfers Ended, Legal Aid Argues
All 28 people had already pleaded guilty to parole violations, so they weren't part of the 1,100 people accused of parole violations whose releases are ongoing through the state.
April 09, 2020 at 04:23 PM
3 minute read
A Bronx County judge agreed Thursday to release 28 people jailed in New York City after a planned transfer to state drug treatment programs became unavailable due to the coronavirus pandemic, giving New York's Legal Aid Society another victory in its ongoing attempts to reduce the population of city jails for health and safety reasons.
All 28 people had been found responsible for parole violations, but they had all been ordered to attend a state-run drug treatment program that would last, at the most, 90 days, according to the petition filed April 2 by Elon Harpaz, staff attorney with the Legal Aid Society's Parole Revocation Defense Unit.
Legal Aid's habeas petition, filed in Bronx Supreme Court, had argued that the inmates' due process rights were being violated as they were subjected to a severely increased risk of getting the novel coronavirus.
They were waiting in city jails in the middle of March, when the state Department of Corrections and Community Supervision stopped transferring people from local custody to state custody as a coronavirus prevention measure, according to court papers.
"That decision has left the Petitioners in limbo, unable to obtain their release upon successful completion of a DOCCS-administered treatment program because they are unable to get to state custody to enter the program," Harpaz wrote. "Instead, they are sitting in jail, mostly at Rikers Island, waiting to be infected with COVID-19."
The Legal Aid Society has argued that the COVID-19 infection rate at Rikers Island is higher than in any municipality in the world, and typical prevention measures like physical distancing and meticulous sanitation procedures are often not possible inside the facility.
Acting Bronx County Supreme Court Justice Alvin Yearwood agreed to release the 28 people after Harpaz argued that each member of the group had pleaded guilty to parole violations because they expected a quick transfer to the drug treatment program, which itself had a designated end date.
Harpaz said in the news release Thursday, "We are glad that the Court recognized that their continued incarceration infringed upon basic due process rights and placed them each in grave danger of contracting COVID-19."
The group would not have been included in the 1,100 people accused of parole violations whose chance at release was announced by DOCCS on March 27, according to Harpaz, because they had already pleaded guilty to parole violations.
As of Thursday, 741 warrants for people accused of parole violations have been lifted statewide, including 264 in New York City, according to the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision. A spokeswoman for DOCCS said the majority of those people have been released, but some remain in custody for a variety of reasons, including because they've been charged with a different crime. The review of the 1,100 cases ongoing, the spokeswoman said.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readEric Adams Trial Set for April as Defense Urges Dismissal of Bribery Count
Major Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Nelson Mullins, Greenberg Traurig, Jones Day Have Established Themselves As Biggest Outsiders in Atlanta Legal Market
- 2Immunity for Mental Health Care and Coverage for CBD: What's on the Pa. High Court's November Calendar
- 3How to Support Law Firm Profitability: Train Partners Up
- 4Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 5Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250