Davis Polk Promises to Pay, Hire Summer Associates While It Mulls Program's Details
The firm told its summer associates on Wednesday morning that it still hasn't decided how or whether to host the program, but whatever happens, it will pay them and offer them jobs.
April 09, 2020 at 10:48 AM
3 minute read
With many firms still undecided about the fate of their summer associate programs, Davis Polk & Wardwell told its 133 summer associates on Wednesday that it will still pay them and offer them full-time jobs upon graduation, regardless of whether the program happens as planned.
The firm's hiring partners, Maurice Blanco and Dana Seshens, said in an email that they "are evaluating our alternatives" to the typical summer program experience because of the hazard posed by the coronavirus pandemic. Many firms have yet to finalize adjustments to their summer programs, which are typically heavy on social interaction and start around mid-May.
"We are evaluating our alternatives for our summer program in light of the current COVID-19 circumstances, all with an eye on providing a meaningful summer associate experience for each of you," Blanco and Seshens wrote. "At this point in time we are not able to provide further details other than our strong desire to hold our summer program, in whatever form it takes, this year."
Neil Barr, Davis Polk's managing partner, said the program was originally set to start on May 4, with 107 summers in New York and smaller numbers in Washington, D.C., northern California, Tokyo, Beijing and Hong Kong. He said a range of options are on the table, including doing the program remotely or, if the risks posed by COVID-19 lessen enough, delaying the start and conducting it in-person.
"Our philosophy during the entirety of this crisis has been to share information as and when we have it, even if the information is incomplete," Barr said. "As we were analyzing the various possibilities for our summer program, the common denominator among them was that we would uphold our commitment to our community, and our community includes our summers."
He said the projected cost of the program—over $4 million—wasn't a factor, saying, "we were very focused on and we will continue to be focused on investing in our people." Davis Polk has not had to reduce working hours, cut salaries or reduce partner draws, as some firms have done, he said.
The news comes on the heels of a report earlier this week that Cahill, Gordon & Reindel would suspend its summer program until circumstances improved, but would still pay summers and offer them jobs.
Boies Schiller Flexner has said it's going forward with its summer program, remotely if need be.
Several firms have shortened their summer programs, and some have plans to conduct those programs virtually. DLA Piper said in an email to Law.com that its current plan is to run its summer program from June 29 through July 31, or six weeks. The firm didn't say whether it would take place remotely or in-person. Cooley has also said it will delay the start of its summer program.
Some firms have canceled their programs altogether, however, citing cost concerns and worries about the feasibility of remote work.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNeighboring States Have Either Passed or Proposed Climate Superfund Laws—Is Pennsylvania Next?
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Perkins Coie Lures Former Longtime Wilson Sonsini Tech Transactions Partner
- 2‘The Decision Will Help Others’: NJ Supreme Court Reverses Appellate Div. in OPRA Claim Over Body-Worn Camera Footage
- 3MoFo Associate Sees a Familiar Face During Her First Appellate Argument: Justice Breyer
- 4Antitrust in Trump 2.0: Expect Gap Filling from State Attorneys General
- 5People in the News—Jan. 22, 2025—Knox McLaughlin, Saxton & Stump
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250