Cuomo Holds Legal Upper Hand in NYC School Argument, Experts Say
Experts say executive orders issued by the third-term governor give him wide legal latitude over public school schedules.
April 14, 2020 at 05:58 PM
4 minute read
New York's two leading elected executives, Gov. Andrew Cuomo and New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio—no strangers to political infighting—are now trading barbs over who wields the authority to close the nation's largest school district for the rest of the academic year.
The political spat sowed confusion and sent mixed messages to parents and educators navigating a coronavirus pandemic that's tied to more than 10,000 deaths statewide.
Schools are already closed across statewide due to the pandemic, but de Blasio announced over the weekend that the city's public schools would remain closed for the rest of the academic year.
Shortly after, Cuomo said he held the legal authority to extend the closure and said no decision had been made. He also dismissed the mayor's announcement as an "opinion." Instead, there should be a coordinated approach with other localities when it comes to extending any school closures, Cuomo argued.
Experts who spoke to the New York Law Journal sided with Cuomo overall on the dispute. They say executive orders issued by the third-term governor give him wide legal latitude over public school schedules.
"The governor does have sweeping powers under his authority," said David Bloomfield, an education law expert at Brooklyn College and The CUNY Graduate Center.
An executive order from Cuomo specifies that schools statewide will remain closed through April 29. The executive order says no school should see reduced school aid due to failing to meet a 180 day in session requirement due to the pandemic, "provided their closure does not extend beyond the term set forth herein."
Gina DeCrescenzo, a special education attorney, said New York City's public school system could refuse to comply with the executive order, but it would then risk losing out on state education money. That, she said, would be "catastrophic" for the city's schools.
"That is where the power struggle is between de Blasio and Cuomo," she said.
The political wrangling comes as New York and six other northeastern states lay the groundwork for coordinating a regional plan to ease coronavirus lock down measures and reboot their economies.
Power struggles have flared between Cuomo and President Donald Trump over the issue.
Cuomo, who has raised his national profile during the coronavirus outbreak, issued widespread lockdown measures through executive orders. He issued the orders by taking advantage of expanded emergency powers given to him by the Legislature earlier this year.
His restrictions sharply curtail gatherings of any size and mandate that all "nonessential" workers stay home.
It remains to be seen if the political fight between Cuomo and de Blasio will spill over into reopening plans.
When it comes to the schedule of public schools, Cuomo has a clear interest in asserting power, particularly as he coordinates a broader reopening framework with other states, said Patrick Boyd, who's firm practices employment, labor and education law.
Overall though, he said it'd be better if New York politicians worked together to deliver a clear plan on the future of school closings.
"Parents have enough going on without having to worry about inconsistent messages," he said.
READ MORE:
As Cuomo Imposes '100% Workforce Reduction,' Law Firms Wrestle With Details
NY State Courts End 'Nonessential' Services in Coronavirus Response
De Blasio Taps Kletter, Former Labor Attorney, as City's Top Administrative Judge
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250