Cuomo Holds Legal Upper Hand in NYC School Argument, Experts Say
Experts say executive orders issued by the third-term governor give him wide legal latitude over public school schedules.
April 14, 2020 at 05:58 PM
4 minute read
New York's two leading elected executives, Gov. Andrew Cuomo and New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio—no strangers to political infighting—are now trading barbs over who wields the authority to close the nation's largest school district for the rest of the academic year.
The political spat sowed confusion and sent mixed messages to parents and educators navigating a coronavirus pandemic that's tied to more than 10,000 deaths statewide.
Schools are already closed across statewide due to the pandemic, but de Blasio announced over the weekend that the city's public schools would remain closed for the rest of the academic year.
Shortly after, Cuomo said he held the legal authority to extend the closure and said no decision had been made. He also dismissed the mayor's announcement as an "opinion." Instead, there should be a coordinated approach with other localities when it comes to extending any school closures, Cuomo argued.
Experts who spoke to the New York Law Journal sided with Cuomo overall on the dispute. They say executive orders issued by the third-term governor give him wide legal latitude over public school schedules.
"The governor does have sweeping powers under his authority," said David Bloomfield, an education law expert at Brooklyn College and The CUNY Graduate Center.
An executive order from Cuomo specifies that schools statewide will remain closed through April 29. The executive order says no school should see reduced school aid due to failing to meet a 180 day in session requirement due to the pandemic, "provided their closure does not extend beyond the term set forth herein."
Gina DeCrescenzo, a special education attorney, said New York City's public school system could refuse to comply with the executive order, but it would then risk losing out on state education money. That, she said, would be "catastrophic" for the city's schools.
"That is where the power struggle is between de Blasio and Cuomo," she said.
The political wrangling comes as New York and six other northeastern states lay the groundwork for coordinating a regional plan to ease coronavirus lock down measures and reboot their economies.
Power struggles have flared between Cuomo and President Donald Trump over the issue.
Cuomo, who has raised his national profile during the coronavirus outbreak, issued widespread lockdown measures through executive orders. He issued the orders by taking advantage of expanded emergency powers given to him by the Legislature earlier this year.
His restrictions sharply curtail gatherings of any size and mandate that all "nonessential" workers stay home.
It remains to be seen if the political fight between Cuomo and de Blasio will spill over into reopening plans.
When it comes to the schedule of public schools, Cuomo has a clear interest in asserting power, particularly as he coordinates a broader reopening framework with other states, said Patrick Boyd, who's firm practices employment, labor and education law.
Overall though, he said it'd be better if New York politicians worked together to deliver a clear plan on the future of school closings.
"Parents have enough going on without having to worry about inconsistent messages," he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readEric Adams Trial Set for April as Defense Urges Dismissal of Bribery Count
Major Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Read the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
- 2Voir Dire Voyeur: I Find Out What Kind of Juror I’d Be
- 3When It Comes to Local Law 97 Compliance, You’ve Gotta Have (Good) Faith
- 4Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
- 5Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Bill Tanenbaum, Partner & Chair, AI & Data Law Practice Group at Moses Singer
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250