Federal Wardens' Report Shows No New Testing in NYC Prisons
Attorneys representing inmates in the two facilities have criticized the lack of testing, saying that it should not be interpreted to mean that COVID-19 is not spreading.
April 14, 2020 at 05:42 PM
4 minute read
No coronavirus tests have been performed in the past five days at New York City's federal detention facilities, according to a court-mandated report submitted Tuesday in the Eastern District of New York.
At Manhattan's Metropolitan Correctional Center and Brooklyn's Metropolitan Detention Center, 17 inmates have been tested and 10 of those tests came back positive, according to the report.
In an April 2 administrative order, Chief Judge Roslynn Mauskopf said that the reports must be submitted every Tuesday and Thursday to give judges and attorneys consistent information about COVID-19 in the detention facilities. Thursday's report showed that 17 inmates had been tested and eight were positive.
Attorneys representing inmates in the two facilities have criticized the lack of testing, saying that it should not be interpreted to mean that COVID-19 is not spreading. Recommended prevention measures such as physical distancing and meticulous sanitation are often impossible in jail settings, according to advocates.
The number of cases among staff members has increased in each report so far, and that trend continued Tuesday. Thirty-one staff members from the MCC and MDC are sick, compared with 21 on Thursday, according to the reports.
Another judge in the Eastern District of New York has ordered officials at the MDC to report in more detail about coronavirus testing protocols at the facility, where five inmates were reported sick Tuesday.
As part of discovery in a proposed class action suit related to the coronavirus, U.S. District Judge Rachel Kovner ordered MDC officials to submit "documents containing protocols that govern when inmates or staff members are tested for COVID-19 and how a person at the MDC can request such a test" by Wednesday.
During a telephone conference Monday, prosecutors representing MDC Warden Derek Edge said they were already turning over that information in the reports to Mauskopf, but Kovner disagreed.
"Evidence about when the MDC tests for COVID-19 bears on [the MDC's] argument that the small number of positive tests suggests that COVID-19 is not widespread within the facility. That evidence is not currently being disclosed in response to [Mauskopf's order]," Kovner wrote in her order Tuesday.
Kovner also ordered the MDC to turn over information about soap deliveries to the MDC and anonymized sick-call requests from all inmates, with the same Wednesday deadline. She overruled the MDC attorneys' objections that because those requests related to all inmates and not just the named plaintiffs in the case, they were too broad.
The overall availability of soap at the MDC relates to whether the named plaintiffs have soap, Kovner wrote. She added that if the named plaintiffs cannot socially distance from other inmates, then the other inmates' access to soap and medical care is also relevant to the risk the plaintiffs face and their Eighth Amendment claims.
Sick call records may also shed more light on the prevalence of COVID-19 at the MDC, despite the lack of tests, Kovner wrote.
"Evidence of the number of inmates submitting sick-call requests based on symptoms consistent with COVID19 is relevant to assessing the likely prevalence of COVID-19 within a facility where few tests have occurred," she wrote.
Kovner did not address the inmates' attorneys' request to send a medical inspector into the MDC, saying she would rule on it at a later time.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
From ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readTrump Picks Personal Criminal Defense Lawyers for Solicitor General, Deputy Attorney General
Trending Stories
- 1FTC Lauds Withdrawal of Proposed Indiana Hospitals Merger After Leaning on State Regulators
- 2Ignore the Decline in US Rule of Law at Your Peril
- 3How Qualcomm’s General Counsel Is Championing Diversity in Innovation
- 4Jury Awards $1.25M to Police Officer Who Claimed Sexual Harassment
- 5Lawyer as Whistleblower? Associate Sues Firm
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250