First Department Going 'Virtual' to Reopen Operations, Attorney Admissions
"With our transition to a virtual court model nearly complete," announced the First Department, the appellate court will soon resume calendaring appeals and motions, scheduling conferences, and holding some oral arguments, though now via Skype. Attorney admissions and processing attorney grievance complaints will also resume.
April 16, 2020 at 08:20 AM
4 minute read
The Appellate Division, First Department has announced that it is "transitioning to a virtual court until further notice," and that it will soon resume many operations, including holding May and June special terms that will include oral arguments via Skype, and electronic calendaring of appeals and motions.
The busy intermediate state appellate court, which hears criminal, civil and Family Court appeals from both Manhattan and the Bronx, has not been calendaring appeals and motions or holding its normal slate of oral arguments since March, when it was forced to suspend most of its operations as the shutdown effects of the novel coronavirus took hold across New York.
In an announcement highlighted in bold red and linked atop the First Department's website, the court said that "in light of the continuing public health emergency in New York State and the obligations of the courts to respect the Governor's New York State on PAUSE Executive Order, the Appellate Division, First Department, is transitioning to a virtual court until further notice."
"With our transition to a virtual court model nearly complete," said the court in the announcement, it was "expanding" operations and will soon resume (1) calendaring appeals and motions, (2) scheduling pre-argument court conferences, (3) admitting attorneys to the state bar, and (4) processing attorney grievance complaints in the First Department.
The court further announced that it would commence both a May Special Term, running from May 4 to May 29, and a June Special Term, lasting from June 1 to June 26, and that it was currently in the process of preparing calendars for the May Special Term.
The court did not make clear how soon calendared appeals, motions and conferences will be completed and accessible for lawyers with cases. As of early Thursday morning, it did not appear calendars for May were available. But the court noted in its announcement that all calendars will be published on the First Department's calendars webpage, and it linked the page.
According to the announcement, matters before the First Department will be calendared for each Wednesday and Thursday during the May special term, beginning with Wednesday, May 6.
In all caps, the court stated, "All calendared matters shall be heard on submission or orally argued via Skype."
There will be no adjournments, the court added, and it said that remote oral arguments will be livestreamed on the First Department's website.
The court also said that "inasmuch as the filing deadlines for the responding and reply briefs for the original June 2020 term have been extended by the Governor's [COVID-19-related] extension order, the responding briefs are now due no later than May 8, 2020, and the reply briefs no later than May 18, 2020."
Further, by the court's order, the announcement said, "the perfection, filing, and other deadlines for the remaining terms of the Court continue to be suspended indefinitely and until further directive of the Court," but litigants can "consensually perfect appeals and file motions" per their agreements.
As had been put in place previously, the First Department kept under suspension, until further notice, "the requirement that hard copy records, appendices, and briefs be filed."
"Hard copy filings will not be permitted for the safety of our employees and the public," the announcement said. But "all filings (appeals, motions and applications) relating to matters subject to mandatory E-filing must still be filed via NYSCEF" under the normal procedures and rules.
Regarding attorney admissions, the announcement noted that the First Department's Committee on Character and Fitness is "actively processing" attorney admission applications and "candidates … will be interviewed remotely and the admission ceremonies will be held remotely via Skype."
"The Court will also resume the issuance of certificates of good standing," the court also said, while linking to the Character & Fitness webpage.
And attorney grievance complaints will be taken electronically and processed remotely, the court added, while linking to the Attorney Grievance Committee webpage.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCourt System Names New Administrative Judges for New York City Courts in Leadership Shakeup
3 minute readRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250