NY AG James, in Suit Over COVID-19 Relief, Says Trump Administration Is Narrowing Path to Key Benefits
The suit argues that the federal Department of Labor regulations implementing those benefits conflict with the goals of the aid package.
April 16, 2020 at 06:31 PM
3 minute read
New York Attorney General Letitia James has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration over U.S. Labor Department regulations implementing the coronavirus relief package, saying it unlawfully narrowed the availability of paid sick leave and emergency family leave benefits.
James filed the federal suit on Tuesday as New York continues to remain in the grips of the coronavirus pandemic, which state figures show has infected nearly a quarter million people statewide.
The lawsuit is linked to the Families First Coronavirus Response Act, a federal aid package that includes provisions for paid sick leave and emergency family leave.
The suit argues that the federal Department of Labor regulations implementing those benefits conflict with the goals of the aid package. In particular, the regulations codify broad exclusions for a worker's eligibility and create new restrictions on workers that do not appear in the federal legislation, according to the lawsuit.
Up to 61 million workers could be eligible for those benefits under the legislation, according to James' office.
"The Trump Administration's rule makes it harder for New Yorkers and Americans throughout the country to claim these paid benefits, which unnecessarily puts more workers at risk of exposure to COVID-19," James said in a statement. "I will fight to prevent that from happening."
The federal department and Eugene Scalia, U.S. secretary of labor, are listed as defendants in the lawsuit.
Scalia, in a recent statement on the legislation, said the bill provides "unprecedented paid leave benefits to American workers affected by the virus, while ensuring that businesses are reimbursed dollar-for-dollar."
But the litigation argues the regulations ultimately undermine Congress' "public health and economic security goals."
According to the lawsuit, the regulations limit a worker's eligibility for paid sick leave and emergency family leave to situations where the company decides that they have work for the employee. But the suit argues that nothing in the text of the legislation limits a worker's entitlement to those circumstances.
The suit also argues the rules put restrictions on when workers can take their leave intermittently, as in separate periods of time.
"Nothing in the [legislation] authorizes the Department to grant employers the ability to deny paid leave to an employee who is otherwise entitled solely because the employer prefers that the leave be taken in one continuous period," according to the lawsuit.
READ MORE:
NY AG James Streamlines Securities Filing Requirements, in Move Partly Spurred by COVID-19
NY AG James Presses Fight Against Trump Administration Rule to Curtail Food Assistance
NY AG Letitia James: Expect 'Significant Delays' With Investor Protection Bureau
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPrivate Equity Giant KKR Refiles SDNY Countersuit in DOJ Premerger Filing Row
3 minute readSkadden and Steptoe, Defending Amex GBT, Blasts Biden DOJ's Antitrust Lawsuit Over Merger Proposal
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250