Federal Judge Sues Insurer, Claiming He Faces Illegal Eviction From Temporary Abode Amid Pandemic
An agent of Allstate Insurance, the judge alleges, set a "move-out" date of April 22, precisely one year after his family home was destroyed in a fire, after making a slow response to his claim and disputes over the provision of information by Allstate.
April 22, 2020 at 05:00 PM
4 minute read
A federal judge and his wife have sued their insurance company, arguing that they are being evicted from a temporary home amid the coronavirus pandemic.
An agent of Allstate Insurance, U.S. District Judge Gary Brown alleges, set a "move-out" date of April 22, precisely one year after his family home was destroyed in a fire. He also said in a complaint filed in the Eastern District of New York that the insurer made a slow response to his claim and the judge and Allstate were in dispute over the provision of information by the insurance company.
The Suffolk County home of Brown sustained a "catastrophic fire that destroyed the home and virtually all of the Browns' possessions" in April 2019, according to the complaint, which was filed Monday by Farrell Fritz partner John McEntee.
The Browns immediately contacted their insurance company, Allstate, to report the fire, but the company's response was slow, according to the complaint.
"Allstate, for almost six months, conducted a dilatory investigation of the Browns' structural loss claim, insisting the home was repairable before acknowledging it was not, needlessly delaying the commencement of demolition and reconstruction," McEntee wrote. "Allstate incurred tens of thousands of dollars of so-called 'remediation costs' in an effort to support this assertion, costs that were charged to the Browns yet incurred only to advance Allstate's economic interest in avoiding a determination that the house could not be restored."
The Browns moved into a temporary rental coordinated by an Allstate housing partner after the fire, and their original home was condemned by a town inspector within two months.
But in the weeks and months after the fire, the couple had such a hard time getting the information they needed from Allstate that they filed multiple complaints with New York's Department of Financial Services, according to the complaint.
In January, the housing company associated with Allstate notified the Browns that their "tentative move-out date" was set for the end of February, according to the complaint. The Browns replied that their new home's construction had begun, "but given Allstate's unconscionable delays in investigating, adjusting, and paying for the fire loss claim," the February move-out date would not work.
A new date was set for April 22, exactly a year after the fire, but then the pandemic halted construction on the new house, according to the complaint. On March 19, one day before Gov. Andrew Cuomo would announce a 90-day statewide eviction moratorium, someone associated with Allstate's housing partner informed the Browns that their notice to vacate had been submitted to their landlord.
The Browns quickly protested, but on March 26, the housing partner emailed the Browns and told them the furniture that had been delivered after the fire would be picked up on April 22, the same day they were supposed to move out.
The Browns have incurred tens of thousands of dollars in costs due to Allstate's actions after a fire that was apparently related to their local power company's negligence, McEntee argued. He wrote that the couple is owed at least $90,000 for living expenses during the delays caused by Allstate and other costs incurred by the company.
At the time the complaint was filed the Browns were still in the rental property.
Allstate did not immediately comment.
Brown was confirmed by the Senate in December. He previously served as a magistrate judge in the Eastern District, and Presidents Barack Obama and Donald Trump each nominated him for the role of district judge.
A judge from outside the Eastern District will be assigned to the case, Chief Judge Roslynn Mauskopf ordered Tuesday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Legal Landscape for Condominium Sponsor Defects Cases: Acting Before Time Runs Out
8 minute readEstablishing the Prevailing Party; Failure To Comply With LLC Law; Takings Claim: This Week in Scott Mollen's Realty Law Digest
Decision of the Day: De Blasio Must Sit for Deposition in Suit Over City Program to Transfer Foreclosed Properties
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 2Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 3Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 4Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250