Mid-Sized Businesses May Be Eligible To Participate in the Main Street New Loan Facility and the Main Street Expanded Loan Facility
The Treasury Department and Federal Reserve Board of Governors are leveraging the existing powers of the Federal Reserve under §13(3) of the Federal Reserve Act to provide credit to private enterprises under the "exigent" circumstances created by the COVID-19 pandemic.
April 23, 2020 at 11:00 AM
6 minute read
In addition to the programs established and the powers granted as part of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the CARES Act), the Treasury Department and Federal Reserve Board of Governors are leveraging the existing powers of the Federal Reserve under §13(3) of the Federal Reserve Act to provide credit to private enterprises under the "exigent" circumstances created by the COVID-19 pandemic. On Thursday, April 9, 2020, they announced that they will establish two new facilities to support lending to midsized businesses that are adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic: (1) the Main Street New Loan Facility and (2) the Main Street Expanded Loan Facility (collectively, the facilities). The Main Street New Loan Facility will finance new loans originated on or after April 8, 2020 (new loans). The Main Street Expanded Loan Facility will finance the extension of additional credit (an upsized tranche) with respect to loans originated prior to April 8, 2020. Included in the announcement were "term sheets" that, by their nature, are not exhaustive of the details of the facilities.
The programs will work as follows: (1) a single-purpose vehicle (SPV) will be established and the Treasury Department will capitalize it with $75 billion made available under the CARES Act; (2) the Federal Reserve Bank will commit to lending $525 billion to the SPV pursuant to its powers under §13(3) of the Federal Reserve Act; (3) eligible lenders (i.e., federally regulated institutions) may but are not required to make a new loan or provide an upsized tranche for an "Eligible Loan" to "Eligible Businesses"; and (4) the SPV will purchase "participations" equal to 95% of the amount of the new loan or upsized tranche up to a combined $600 billion for both facilities. A participation is an agreement under which economic beneficial ownership of a percentage of a loan is purchased from the lead lender by a participant but under which the lead lender retains the right to administer the loan subject to the terms of the participation agreement. Presumably, lenders will make loans that qualify for the purchase of a participation under the facilities in circumstances where they would not otherwise provide such loans, and in that way the borrowers of such loans that are adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic will benefit.
To take advantage of the program, businesses will need to be an eligible business, which, according to the term sheet, will include the following criteria:
- Businesses with up to 10,000 employees or up to $2.5 billion in 2019 annual revenues.
- Businesses created or organized in the United States or under the laws of the United States with significant operations in the United States and with a majority of their employees based in the United States.
The SPV will only purchase participations that meet the criteria for a new loan or an upsized tranche of an eligible loan, which, according to the term sheets, include the following:
- A four-year maturity with amortization of principal deferred for one year.
- Interest at a rate equal to the adjustable rate of the Secured Overnight Financing Rate plus 240-400 basis points.
- A minimum size of $1 million.
- Prepayment permitted without penalty.
- Maximum loan size as follows:
- In the case of the Main Street Expanded Loan Facility, the maximum upsized tranche loan size is the lesser of (1) $150 million, (2) 30% of the business's existing outstanding and committed but undrawn bank debt, or (3) an amount that, when added to existing outstanding and committed but undrawn debt, does not exceed six times 2019 earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA).
- In the case of the Main Street New Loan Facility, the maximum size of a new loan is the lesser of (1) $25 million or (2) an amount that, when added to the business's existing outstanding and committed but undrawn debt, does not exceed four times the business's 2019 EBITDA.
According to the term sheet in the case of an upsized tranche, the collateral securing the existing loan must be shared pro rata with the upsized tranche. This requirement will be a critical factor as to whether lenders will be willing to provide an upsized tranche. Of perhaps even more significance is the requirement in the second bullet point under the section regarding required "Attestations," in which it is stated that borrowers must commit to refrain from repaying other debt of equal or lower priority, with the exception of mandatory principal payments, unless the borrower has first repaid the Eligible Loan in full. If this means that the upsized tranche needs to be repaid before the remaining amounts owed to a lender, this may make the program unattractive to lenders.
The term sheets also lay out other requirements for any new loans or upsized tranches, which include:
- Proceeds not be used to repay or refinance preexisting loans or lines of credit.
- The lender and borrower must agree not to cancel or reduce any existing lines of credit outstanding to the borrower.
- The borrower will make reasonable efforts to maintain its payroll and retain its employees during the term of the upsized tranche or new loan.
- The borrower must follow compensation, stock repurchase, and capital distribution restrictions that apply to direct loan programs under §4003(c)(3)(A)(ii) of the CARES Act.
The term sheets do not incorporate all the requirements for loans under the CARES Act, such as the rigorous requirements regarding maintaining employment. The term sheet provides that a borrower must make "reasonable efforts to maintain its payroll and retain employees" during the period that the upsized tranche or new loan is outstanding. This is a far lower standard than the general requirements imposed under the CARES Act. This is possible because §4003(c)(3)(D)(ii) of the CARES Act expressly provides that action by the Federal Reserve under §13(3) of the Federal Reserve Act, including actions in which the Treasury participates, need not comply with all the requirements in that subsection of the CARES Act.
The next steps in the process will presumably be (1) establishing the terms of the participation being purchased by the SPV by drafting a form of participation agreement and (2) drafting definitive model documents or standard terms for new loans and upsized tranches. Those terms will determine whether the lenders will be willing to make new loans and upsized tranches and whether borrowers will be willing to enter into such transactions. In the case of an upsized tranche, the documents will probably need to be custom tailored to work with the existing credit documents.
Howard Berkower is a partner in the New York office of McCarter & English and a member of the firm's corporate law practice. William D. Brown Jr. is an associate in the firm's bankruptcy & restructuring group in Newark. Curtis A. Johnson is a partner in the Newark office and a member of the firm's corporate law practice.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe CFPB Is Digging In for Last Days of Biden's Term. But What Happens Next?
6 minute readNY AG James Targets Crypto Fraud Which Allegedly Ensnared Victims With Fake Jobs
4 minute read'Merciless' Filing Deadline Dooms Cuban Americans' Property-Trafficking Suit Against BNP Paribas, SocGen
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Reviewing Judge Merchan's Unconditional Discharge
- 2With New Civil Jury Selection Rule, Litigants Should Carefully Weigh Waiver Risks
- 3Young Lawyers Become Old(er) Lawyers
- 4Caught In the In Between: A Legal Roadmap for the Sandwich Generation
- 5Top 10 Developments, Lessons, and Reminders of 2024
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250