'A Very Different Court System': Marks Says There's No Timeline for Lifting Ban on New 'Nonessential' Lawsuits in NY
There were more than 3 million cases filed in trial courts statewide last year and Marks said it would be a serious mistake to open up the litigation "floodgates."
April 24, 2020 at 05:41 PM
3 minute read
New York Chief Administrative Judge Lawrence Marks said that there's no timeline for when the state court system might lift a ban on new nonessential lawsuits, arguing that virtual operations are not yet able to manage the wave of litigation.
Marks said some people have suggested there should be no limits on the filing of new cases. He said people putting that forward are "greatly misinformed."
"This is a very different court system than the one that existed only a month ago, and it's not yet ready to handle anywhere near the volume of cases it normally handles," Marks said in an interview Wednesday with the New York Law Journal.
The state's court system rolled out sweeping restrictions last month and closed off all "nonessential" services as New York's coronavirus crisis intensified.
The system has since thawed the restrictions, announcing that virtual court operations would be used in a variety of pending cases. But, there remains a ban on new nonessential lawsuits.
Conducting virtual court proceedings is no simple task, Marks said. The effort includes training staff, providing technology resources to judges, and leaning on IT employees who have worked around the clock with limited personnel, he noted.
There were more than 3 million cases filed in trial courts statewide last year, and Marks said it would be a serious mistake to open up the litigation "floodgates." The court system, he said, would not allow thousands of new cases to be filed just so they could sit around.
The court system says it plans to expand virtual court access in the short term, but the specifics of those plans continue to remain unclear.
New York is set to remain under COVID-19 lockdown measures through at least mid-May in a persistent effort to slow the virus's spread. The measures, which sharply restrict gatherings and require nonessential workers to stay home, are aimed at reducing the in-person interactions that spread the virus.
New York and six other northeastern states laid the groundwork earlier this month to coordinate a plan to restart the crippled economy and ease coronavirus lockdown measures. Gov. Andrew Cuomo and the six other governors announced a working group would tackle the issue.
Comments from Cuomo on Tuesday conflicted with that messaging. The third-term governor said New York will make reopening decisions on a regional basis for different parts of the state.
Marks reported there have been no conversations around the widespread opening of courthouses and said the court system will follows Cuomo's lead on when to reopen.
"Our focus is on ensuring that these virtual proceedings are operating successfully," he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDecision of the Day: Second Amendment Does Not Offer Right to Obtain Firearms 'On Demand'
Decision of the Day: Firm, Founding Partner Disqualified From Probate Case Amid Investigation on Undue Influence Claim
Decision of the Day: District Judge Vacates Magistrate's Ruling to Disqualify Prosecutors in Kidnapping Case
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.