Corrections Unions Sue New York City, Objecting to 24-Hour Shifts and Lack of Testing
Nearly 600 staff members have become sick with COVID-19 since the pandemic began, and nine have died, according to the complaint, which was filed in Queens Supreme Court.
April 24, 2020 at 02:44 PM
3 minute read
A Queens County judge denied New York City corrections officers' request for a temporary restraining order Friday, after city lawyers argued that Mayor Bill de Blasio's public promise to end 24-hour shifts for officers rendered the unions' application moot.
In a lawsuit filed Thursday, unions representing corrections officers and their supervisors argued that 24-hour "triple shifts" are dangerous for officers, particularly amid the coronavirus pandemic. They also called for the city to require officers to obtain negative COVID-19 tests before they return to work from sick leave.
Steven Isaacs of Koehler & Isaacs, who is representing one of the three corrections unions involved in the action, said the unions are exploring their options for appeal and for a preliminary injunction.
Nearly 600 staff members have become sick with COVID-19 since the pandemic began, and nine have died, according to the complaint, which has been assigned to Queens County Supreme Court Justice Pam Jackman Brown.
"The inability to sleep for a solid day as is the case with triple shifts is a direct invitation to infection and disease," lawyers representing the unions wrote. "In the age of COVID-19, triple shifts may be a death sentence."
De Blasio responded to the complaint with a tweet soon after Politico broke the news of the filing Thursday, telling corrections officers that the 24-hour shifts were a mistake and "this will never happen again."
In a press conference Friday, de Blasio was also asked about the testing policy, and he said the corrections officers are being held to the same standard as other city employees.
"The test is not the only way to know if someone's well enough to come back," de Blasio said. "So, we're going to stick with the standard that we've been using. When we go forward into the test-and-trace phase, of course, there'll be so much more testing around in general. That will be a different reality."
In their TRO application, the unions' lawyers suggested that officers who are serving modified duty for reasons unrelated to inmate care move back onto regular duty to ameliorate staffing issues.
"Literally every moment uniformed staff spend at work entails an ongoing terror that the illness will be contracted or carried to loved ones," the lawyers wrote. "This terror, and the attendant illness, is simply not reparable by damages."
Devin Cohen, assistant corporation counsel for the New York City Law Department's Labor and Employment Law Division, argued in his opposition to the TRO application that the Department of Correction has tried to keep triple shifts to a minimum and has offered breaks to officers who do work them.
As of 5:30 p.m. Friday, Isaacs said corrections officers had not received a written directive from the Department of Correction reflecting de Blasio's promise that triple shifts would end.
The suit was filed by Koehler & Isaacs, Pitta LLP and Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman, which are representing, respectively, the Correction Officers Benevolent Association, the Correction Captains' Association, and the Assistant Deputy Wardens and Deputy Wardens Association.
READ MORE:
Certain NY Prisoners Will See Release Amid Pandemic, Top Cuomo Aide Says
Zero Coronavirus Tests in a Week Amid 'Shortage' at New York City's Federal Lockups
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Plan Suit
4 minute readRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250