Corrections Unions Sue New York City, Objecting to 24-Hour Shifts and Lack of Testing
Nearly 600 staff members have become sick with COVID-19 since the pandemic began, and nine have died, according to the complaint, which was filed in Queens Supreme Court.
April 24, 2020 at 02:44 PM
3 minute read
A Queens County judge denied New York City corrections officers' request for a temporary restraining order Friday, after city lawyers argued that Mayor Bill de Blasio's public promise to end 24-hour shifts for officers rendered the unions' application moot.
In a lawsuit filed Thursday, unions representing corrections officers and their supervisors argued that 24-hour "triple shifts" are dangerous for officers, particularly amid the coronavirus pandemic. They also called for the city to require officers to obtain negative COVID-19 tests before they return to work from sick leave.
Steven Isaacs of Koehler & Isaacs, who is representing one of the three corrections unions involved in the action, said the unions are exploring their options for appeal and for a preliminary injunction.
Nearly 600 staff members have become sick with COVID-19 since the pandemic began, and nine have died, according to the complaint, which has been assigned to Queens County Supreme Court Justice Pam Jackman Brown.
"The inability to sleep for a solid day as is the case with triple shifts is a direct invitation to infection and disease," lawyers representing the unions wrote. "In the age of COVID-19, triple shifts may be a death sentence."
De Blasio responded to the complaint with a tweet soon after Politico broke the news of the filing Thursday, telling corrections officers that the 24-hour shifts were a mistake and "this will never happen again."
In a press conference Friday, de Blasio was also asked about the testing policy, and he said the corrections officers are being held to the same standard as other city employees.
"The test is not the only way to know if someone's well enough to come back," de Blasio said. "So, we're going to stick with the standard that we've been using. When we go forward into the test-and-trace phase, of course, there'll be so much more testing around in general. That will be a different reality."
In their TRO application, the unions' lawyers suggested that officers who are serving modified duty for reasons unrelated to inmate care move back onto regular duty to ameliorate staffing issues.
"Literally every moment uniformed staff spend at work entails an ongoing terror that the illness will be contracted or carried to loved ones," the lawyers wrote. "This terror, and the attendant illness, is simply not reparable by damages."
Devin Cohen, assistant corporation counsel for the New York City Law Department's Labor and Employment Law Division, argued in his opposition to the TRO application that the Department of Correction has tried to keep triple shifts to a minimum and has offered breaks to officers who do work them.
As of 5:30 p.m. Friday, Isaacs said corrections officers had not received a written directive from the Department of Correction reflecting de Blasio's promise that triple shifts would end.
The suit was filed by Koehler & Isaacs, Pitta LLP and Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman, which are representing, respectively, the Correction Officers Benevolent Association, the Correction Captains' Association, and the Assistant Deputy Wardens and Deputy Wardens Association.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHochul Vetoes 'Grieving Families' Bill, Faulting a Lack of Changes to Suit Her Concerns
Court System Names New Administrative Judges for New York City Courts in Leadership Shakeup
3 minute readRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250