Graduates of New York Law Schools Outperformed Peers in State's Feb Bar Exam
The passing rate for New York law school graduates who took the February bar exam for the first time was the highest in a decade.
April 24, 2020 at 06:45 PM
2 minute read
As a group, New York law school graduates who took the bar exam for the first time in February saw an especially high success rate.
The passing rate for those 340 candidates was 74%—an increase of 2% from last February and the highest passing rate for this group for a February administration since 2010, according to the New York State Board of Law Examiners on Friday.
But for everyone else taking the bar for the first time, it wasn't a record year. The passing rate for the 426 graduates of out-of-state ABA-approved law schools who took the exam in February for the first time was 70%, a decrease of 2% from last year. The overall pass rate of all 766 graduates who took the exam for the first time was 72%, the same passing rate for this cohort as last year.
The board said it examined a total of 3,563 candidates, including U. S. domestic-educated candidates and foreign-educated candidates, first-time and repeat takers, during the two days of testing in late February. Of those candidates, 1,430 passed for an overall passing rate of 40%, down from the overall passing rate of 45% on the February 2019 examination, the board said.
The board said that the decrease in the overall passing rate is "largely attributable" to the performance of the repeat-takers and foreign-educated candidates who sat for the examination. The passing rate for the 2,254 repeat takers of the bar examination in February was 28%, and repeat takers accounted for 64% of all candidates who sat for the February examination. Foreign educated candidates, totaling 1,649 or 46% of all candidates, had a passing rate of 31%, the board said.
Candidates who sat for the exam were notified of their results Friday.
Anyone wishing to take the next New York exam will have to wait longer this year. The July 2020 New York State Bar Examination has been pushed back to Sept. 9 and 10, due to concerns about the spread of COVID-19.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Met Hires GC of Elite University as Next Legal Chief
NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
'No Evidence'?: Big Law Firms Defend Academic Publishers in EDNY Antitrust Case
3 minute read'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'A Shock to the System’: Some Government Attorneys Are Forced Out, While Others Weigh Job Options
- 2Lackawanna County Lawyer Fails to Shake Legal Mal Claims Over Sex With Client
- 3Florida Judge Denies Motion to Dismiss in $150M Plane Crash Lawsuit Involving Flow La Movie
- 4HSF Accounts Show US Operating Losses Last Year But Revenue Increased Slightly
- 5Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250