Long Island Man Charged With Hoarding, Price Gouging in Violation of Defense Production Act
The defendant, a Long Island man, is the first person to be charged under the Defense Production Act in connection with the coronavirus pandemic, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York.
April 24, 2020 at 03:40 PM
4 minute read
A Long Island man was charged with violating the Defense Production Act on Friday by hoarding personal protective equipment and price-gouging customers, including organizations that needed the equipment to care for vulnerable populations, according to court documents.
Amardeep Singh, 45, of Woodbury, New York, is the first person to be charged under the Defense Production Act in connection with the coronavirus pandemic, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York.
Prior to March, Singh sold shoes and apparel from his store in Plainview, New York, according to Friday's complaint. But he began to sell and advertise hand sanitizer and other items associated with coronavirus prevention in March, and an April 14 search of his store and warehouse revealed more than 20,000 N95 respirators, nearly 900,000 disposable gloves and thousands of other masks, face shields and "full-body isolation suits," according to the complaint.
Under the Defense Production Act of 1950, which was invoked by President Donald Trump in an executive order March 18, scarce and critical items cannot be hoarded or resold above the "prevailing market price."
Singh sold many items at a markup of at least 100% above the price at which he acquired them, according to the complaint; one type of disposable mask was resold for more than seven times the price he paid. His customers included nonprofits focused on children and senior citizens, according to the complaint.
The Nassau County Department of Consumer Affairs issued a series of citations to one of Singh's businesses in March, accusing him of "unconscionable trade practices," including repackaging individual N95 masks in Ziploc bags and selling protective gear without appropriate user instructions.
Another of Singh's businesses received a cease and desist letter from the New York Attorney General's Office in early April, warning him about price gouging.
Singh's lawyer, Bradley Gerstman of Gerstman Schwartz, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Singh is expected to self-surrender next week, a spokesman in the U.S. Attorney's Office said.
The case has been assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Steven Locke, according to court records.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readTrump, ABC News Settlement in Defamation Lawsuit Includes $1M in Attorney Fees For President-Elect
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250