NY City Bar Calls for Congressional Probe, IG Protections After Trump Removes Some Watchdogs
In a letter to congressional leaders from the U.S. House and Senate, the City Bar's Task Force on the Rule of Law called Trump's abrupt firings an "affront to Congress" and federal laws establishing oversight mechanisms for Executive Branch agencies.
April 27, 2020 at 05:52 PM
4 minute read
The New York City Bar Association has called on Congress to investigate President Donald Trump's recent removal of two inspectors general and urged new protections to ensure the independence of government watchdogs.
In a letter to congressional leaders from the U.S. House and Senate, the City Bar's Task Force on the Rule of Law called Trump's abrupt firings an "affront to Congress" and federal laws establishing oversight mechanisms for Executive Branch agencies.
The letter followed Trump's decision earlier this month to fire Michael Atkinson as the inspector general of the U.S. intelligence community over his handling of an anonymous whistleblower complaint, which later became the basis for a congressional impeachment inquiry. Three days later, Trump replaced Glenn Fine as acting inspector general for the Department of Defense, and installed a replacement to oversee the distribution of $2 trillion in emergency federal funds under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act.
In recent statements, the City Bar said, Trump had also suggested, without evidence, that Department of Health and Human Services Inspector General Christi Grimm was acting out of political motivation and hinted at her pending removal.
The letter, which also included a six-page report condemning the president's actions, claimed that Trump's removal Atkinson and Glenn flouted the Inspector General Act of 1978, which requires the president to provide Congress 30 days' notice prior to an inspector general's firing, as well as the written reasons explaining the decision. Trump has argued that he has broad authority as president to fire inspectors general as he sees fit and that his decisions are not subject to review by Congress.
The City Bar, however, said that Trump's attacks on the inspectors general were "extremely troubling, both in their immediate effects and in the message they send to the federal inspector general offices and to the public."
The report urged Congress to hold hearings to investigate the removals and called for legislation to bar any such actions from taking effect until 30 days after the president had notified Congress of the reasons for the removals. Those protections, the City Bar said, should also extend to anyone who is serving in an acting capacity.
"Those whose jobs involve oversight are working in difficult and often contentious positions, and are extremely vulnerable to abuse by those who do not necessarily want these jobs done, or who do not want them done with independence and transparency," task force chairman Stephen Kass wrote in the report.
"The president's attacks on IGs are also an attack on the institutions of our government that ensure accountability of our public officials," he said. "It is important, therefore, that Congress act promptly both to reform the IG Act in the manner recommended above and to take whatever other actions Congress finds appropriate to protect IG independence."
The City Bar, which has been vocal in its opposition to certain actions taken by the Trump administration, has also called for a Congressional probe of Attorney General William Barr over public statements that it said threatened the "public confidence in the fair and impartial administration of justice."
Last October, the group also called for Barr to recuse himself from any DOJ investigations pertaining to the Trump administration's dealings with Ukraine, after he was named in the whistleblower complaint alleging that Trump had pressured Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to announce investigations into his political rival, former Vice President Joe Biden.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readTrump, ABC News Settlement in Defamation Lawsuit Includes $1M in Attorney Fees For President-Elect
Can Law Firms Avoid Landing on 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250