NY City Bar Urges Humanitarian Exception to Ethics Rules to Allow Attorney Contributions to Poor Clients
One organization asked about helping to pay for food and rent in the immigrant communities it served. Another lawyer said that they wanted to contribute to a community restaurant that served low-income residents, but faced potential disciplinary action if they attempted to do so.
April 27, 2020 at 04:00 PM
3 minute read
The New York City Bar Association has urged a panel of the state's top judges to adopt a proposed rule change that would allow attorneys to provide financial assistance to poor clients and those they are working for on a pro bono basis.
The City Bar said in an April 24 letter to the Administrative Board of the Courts that the COVID-19 pandemic had created an "urgent need" to amend state ethics rules, which forbid lawyers from contributing money to litigation clients.
The City Bar's proposal aims to carve out a "humanitarian exception" to Rule 1.8(e) of the New York Rules of Professional Conduct that would allow lawyers, firms and legal services organizations to create a fund to help cover the cost of basic living expenses, like groceries, clothes and medical supplies.
"As the court is well aware, New Yorkers are experiencing severe financial consequences as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Thousands of New Yorkers have lost their jobs, been forced to close their businesses, or are unable to work because of illness," the letter said.
"The proposed humanitarian exception to Rule 1.8(e) would allow lawyers to provide much needed financial assistance to those in need during this unprecedented time."
Under the current system, attorneys are permitted to advance court costs and cover litigation expenses for pro bono clients. However, other forms of financial support are expressly prohibited.
The City Bar first proposed the rule change in March 2018, as a part of report by its professional responsibility committee. But the group said that it began fielding calls "almost immediately" after the pandemic hit from lawyers and nonprofit groups, who wanted to provide small amounts of assistance to indigent clients.
For example, the letter said, one organization asked about helping to pay for food and rent in the immigrant communities it served. Another lawyer said that they wanted to contribute to a community restaurant that served low-income residents, but faced potential disciplinary action if they attempted to do so.
The New York State Bar Association, meanwhile, has offered "strong support" for the measure, with limitations that lawyers not be permitted to advertise the assistance or otherwise use it to continue representing clients.
The NYSBA's House of Delegates approved the humanitarian exception at its annual meeting Jan. 31 and forwarded the proposal to the Administrative board, which includes Chief Judge Janet DiFiore and the four presiding justices of the Appellate Division of the state Supreme Court.
"We are therefore urging the Courts to act quickly to approve the humanitarian exception," the letter said.
If the Administrative Board was not prepared to immediately implement a permanent rule change, the City Bar said the judges should consider temporary action lifting the humanitarian exception or to allow financial aid to pro bono clients.
A spokesman for the courts did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'So Many Firms' Have Yet to Announce Associate Bonuses, Underlining Big Law's Uneven Approach
5 minute readGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readT14 Sees Black, Hispanic Law Student Representation Decline Following End of Affirmative Action
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250