NY City Bar Urges Humanitarian Exception to Ethics Rules to Allow Attorney Contributions to Poor Clients
One organization asked about helping to pay for food and rent in the immigrant communities it served. Another lawyer said that they wanted to contribute to a community restaurant that served low-income residents, but faced potential disciplinary action if they attempted to do so.
April 27, 2020 at 04:00 PM
3 minute read
The New York City Bar Association has urged a panel of the state's top judges to adopt a proposed rule change that would allow attorneys to provide financial assistance to poor clients and those they are working for on a pro bono basis.
The City Bar said in an April 24 letter to the Administrative Board of the Courts that the COVID-19 pandemic had created an "urgent need" to amend state ethics rules, which forbid lawyers from contributing money to litigation clients.
The City Bar's proposal aims to carve out a "humanitarian exception" to Rule 1.8(e) of the New York Rules of Professional Conduct that would allow lawyers, firms and legal services organizations to create a fund to help cover the cost of basic living expenses, like groceries, clothes and medical supplies.
"As the court is well aware, New Yorkers are experiencing severe financial consequences as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Thousands of New Yorkers have lost their jobs, been forced to close their businesses, or are unable to work because of illness," the letter said.
"The proposed humanitarian exception to Rule 1.8(e) would allow lawyers to provide much needed financial assistance to those in need during this unprecedented time."
Under the current system, attorneys are permitted to advance court costs and cover litigation expenses for pro bono clients. However, other forms of financial support are expressly prohibited.
The City Bar first proposed the rule change in March 2018, as a part of report by its professional responsibility committee. But the group said that it began fielding calls "almost immediately" after the pandemic hit from lawyers and nonprofit groups, who wanted to provide small amounts of assistance to indigent clients.
For example, the letter said, one organization asked about helping to pay for food and rent in the immigrant communities it served. Another lawyer said that they wanted to contribute to a community restaurant that served low-income residents, but faced potential disciplinary action if they attempted to do so.
The New York State Bar Association, meanwhile, has offered "strong support" for the measure, with limitations that lawyers not be permitted to advertise the assistance or otherwise use it to continue representing clients.
The NYSBA's House of Delegates approved the humanitarian exception at its annual meeting Jan. 31 and forwarded the proposal to the Administrative board, which includes Chief Judge Janet DiFiore and the four presiding justices of the Appellate Division of the state Supreme Court.
"We are therefore urging the Courts to act quickly to approve the humanitarian exception," the letter said.
If the Administrative Board was not prepared to immediately implement a permanent rule change, the City Bar said the judges should consider temporary action lifting the humanitarian exception or to allow financial aid to pro bono clients.
A spokesman for the courts did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Read More:
City Bar Urges Passage of Statute Shifting Some Emergency Power Away From President
City Bar Applauds State Court's COVID-19 Changes—Then Suggests 10 More
NY City Bar Call for US AG William Barr's Recusal in Ukraine Matter Draws Variety of Reactions
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNeighboring States Have Either Passed or Proposed Climate Superfund Laws—Is Pennsylvania Next?
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250