2020 Election Sidebar: Can the Election Be Postponed?
We have not cancelled or postponed any of our 58 presidential elections—not during wars, economic calamities or natural disasters.
April 28, 2020 at 10:30 AM
3 minute read
This is the first article in a series titled 2020 Election Sidebar, which explores salient legal issues of the 2020 election.
Former Vice President Joe Biden says he is worried that President Trump may delay the November election to stay in office. He needn't be. Trump has no authority to cancel or postpone the presidential election. The U.S. Constitution explicitly provides that a president's term is four years, and the new or re-elected president is sworn in at noon on January 20th. There is no provision or precedent for a sitting president to extend his term beyond then.
On the other hand, Congress can postpone it, but only for a short time. The constitution directs Congress to set the dates for the election, and it has done so. Since 1845, the day presidential electors are chosen is the Tuesday after the first Monday in November, Election Day (this year, Nov. 3). Congress also sets the date when the Electoral College meets to actually vote for president, which is the first Monday after the second Wednesday in December (Dec. 14); and the date when it meets to tally the votes (Jan. 6th). So, if the pandemic is still raging in the fall, Congress alone has the authority to adjust this election timeline—provided there is sufficient time for either Biden or Trump to take the oath of office at noon on Jan. 20th.
Luckily, Congress is divided, ensuring that any modification of the calendar, as extraordinarily unique in our history as it would be, would have to be a bipartisan effort.
Any delay must be of limited duration, however, so that the president can start his term on Inauguration Day. Congress would have to take into account the expected increase in mail-in ballots, as well as extensive court proceedings if the results are close and vigorously contested. That said, if there is no clear winner by January 20th, the constitution provides a solution—the law of succession comes into play. In 1947, Congress named the Speaker of the House of Representatives as next in line. Given today's political realities, when the new House members take their seats, the new Speaker—and, under this hypothetical, the new president—would likely be Nancy Pelosi, at least until the election results are finalized.
This highly unlikely scenario can get even more bizarre if the Republicans win the House and its chosen Speaker ascends to the vacant presidency. In that there is no requirement the Speaker is a duly elected representative, they can install Donald Trump as Speaker, and voila he would then become president.
Gaming out this maze of constitutional law could be fun if it weren't so serious. We have not cancelled or postponed any of our 58 presidential elections—not during wars, economic calamities or natural disasters. Even after 9/11, the House voted 419-2 "never" to postpone a presidential election because of terrorism. The same should be said with respect to the current health crisis. Congress, therefore, should not even entertain the idea. In any event, the chances of Democrats and Republicans jointly doing this is highly remote.
And that is good—because the continuity of our elections is too important to be tampered with.
Jerry H. Goldfeder is special counsel at Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, teaches Election Law and the Presidency at Fordham Law School, and is the author of the treatise Goldfeder's Modern Election Law.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250