2020 Election Sidebar: Can the Election Be Postponed?
We have not cancelled or postponed any of our 58 presidential elections—not during wars, economic calamities or natural disasters.
April 28, 2020 at 10:30 AM
3 minute read
This is the first article in a series titled 2020 Election Sidebar, which explores salient legal issues of the 2020 election.
Former Vice President Joe Biden says he is worried that President Trump may delay the November election to stay in office. He needn't be. Trump has no authority to cancel or postpone the presidential election. The U.S. Constitution explicitly provides that a president's term is four years, and the new or re-elected president is sworn in at noon on January 20th. There is no provision or precedent for a sitting president to extend his term beyond then.
On the other hand, Congress can postpone it, but only for a short time. The constitution directs Congress to set the dates for the election, and it has done so. Since 1845, the day presidential electors are chosen is the Tuesday after the first Monday in November, Election Day (this year, Nov. 3). Congress also sets the date when the Electoral College meets to actually vote for president, which is the first Monday after the second Wednesday in December (Dec. 14); and the date when it meets to tally the votes (Jan. 6th). So, if the pandemic is still raging in the fall, Congress alone has the authority to adjust this election timeline—provided there is sufficient time for either Biden or Trump to take the oath of office at noon on Jan. 20th.
Luckily, Congress is divided, ensuring that any modification of the calendar, as extraordinarily unique in our history as it would be, would have to be a bipartisan effort.
Any delay must be of limited duration, however, so that the president can start his term on Inauguration Day. Congress would have to take into account the expected increase in mail-in ballots, as well as extensive court proceedings if the results are close and vigorously contested. That said, if there is no clear winner by January 20th, the constitution provides a solution—the law of succession comes into play. In 1947, Congress named the Speaker of the House of Representatives as next in line. Given today's political realities, when the new House members take their seats, the new Speaker—and, under this hypothetical, the new president—would likely be Nancy Pelosi, at least until the election results are finalized.
This highly unlikely scenario can get even more bizarre if the Republicans win the House and its chosen Speaker ascends to the vacant presidency. In that there is no requirement the Speaker is a duly elected representative, they can install Donald Trump as Speaker, and voila he would then become president.
Gaming out this maze of constitutional law could be fun if it weren't so serious. We have not cancelled or postponed any of our 58 presidential elections—not during wars, economic calamities or natural disasters. Even after 9/11, the House voted 419-2 "never" to postpone a presidential election because of terrorism. The same should be said with respect to the current health crisis. Congress, therefore, should not even entertain the idea. In any event, the chances of Democrats and Republicans jointly doing this is highly remote.
And that is good—because the continuity of our elections is too important to be tampered with.
Jerry H. Goldfeder is special counsel at Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, teaches Election Law and the Presidency at Fordham Law School, and is the author of the treatise Goldfeder's Modern Election Law.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBenjamin West and John Singleton Copley: American Painters in London
8 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250