Manhattan Federal Inmates Accuse Jailers of 'Ineptitude and Indifference' in Dealing With Pandemic
A proposed class action lawsuit, filed in Manhattan federal court by a Covington & Burling partner, said the coronavirus was spreading "unmonitored and undetected throughout the jail," due in large part to overcrowding and unsanitary conditions.
April 28, 2020 at 06:05 PM
5 minute read
Five inmates at the Metropolitan Correctional Center on Tuesday accused the troubled Manhattan jail and its warden of "ineptitude and indifference," as federal prison officials in New York continued to report minimal levels of testing in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
In a proposed class action lawsuit, filed in Manhattan federal court by a Covington & Burling partner, said the coronavirus was spreading "unmonitored and undetected throughout the jail," due in large part to overcrowding and unsanitary conditions.
Officials, the suit alleged, had also failed to remove symptomatic inmates from larger dormitories, where more than two dozen men bunk in close quarters and share just a single toilet and one or two sinks. Inmates suspected of being infected with the disease have only received, "at best, only cursory medical attention," and testing and tracing were nearly nonexistent, according to the filing.
"Judicial intervention is required to compel the MCC to improve conditions of incarceration and take other steps to comply with the requirements of the U.S. Constitution and lessen the risk of serious illness or the death of individuals in its care," Covington & Burling partner Arlo Devlin-Brown wrote on behalf of the plaintiffs.
The lawsuit was filed on behalf of five inmates, who MCC had identified as particularly vulnerable to the disease based on criteria published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Some of the plaintiffs were suffering from COVID-19 or feared they might contract the virus due to their proximity to other inmates. According to the filing, none had been tested for the disease.
The 29-page complaint, which alleged violations of the Fifth and Eighth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, mirrored a similar lawsuit filed in Eastern District of New York on behalf of inmates at Brooklyn's Metropolitan Detention Center, and it asked for a court order mandating MCC and its warden, Marti Licon-Vitale, to implement appropriate tracking, testing and social-distancing measures.
The federal Bureau of Prisons did not immediately respond Tuesday to a request for comment.
As of Tuesday, a total of 21 inmates have been tested for coronavirus at MCC and MDC combined, a small increase compared to 19 last week. Eleven of those tests have come back positive, according to the report. Staff cases of coronavirus continue to increase at both facilities, from 59 on Thursday to 69 Tuesday.
The MCC and MDC wardens are required to report on their coronavirus testing twice weekly under an April 2 order from U.S. District Chief Judge Roslynn Mauskopf, who also ordered the wardens to report on "all efforts undertaken to mitigate the spread of COVID-19."
In each report so far, the wardens have described their enactment of the Bureau of Prisons' national action plan to promote social distancing, which includes limiting the time inmates spend outside their cells.
"The national action plan will not, however, affect the provision of legal phone calls," they repeated in each report. "Inmates will still be taken out of their cells for legal phone calls."
Lawyers representing inmates at the MDC in an ongoing suit against the Bureau of Prisons have repeatedly said that's not the case, telling U.S. District Judge Margo Brodie of the Eastern District of New York that their clients' requests for calls have been ignored and the calls that do happen tend to be short.
Sean Hecker of Kaplan Hecker & Fink, who is representing MDC inmates alongside the Federal Defenders of New York, filed a letter Tuesday telling Brodie that inmates in medical isolation are still struggling to reach their attorneys. Four legal calls were scheduled Monday for inmates in isolation, but only one call took place, Hecker wrote.
"We wanted to inform the Court of this issue immediately, because whatever the reason, we respectfully request that the BOP be instructed that such calls are mandatory, and if there is a particular reason why a call with an inmate in medical isolation cannot be placed on a particular day, the BOP should immediately inform counsel for the inmate of that, and reschedule the call, not simply choose not to place the call," Hecker wrote.
Physical visits between attorneys and inmates are suspended due to coronavirus restrictions, and Brodie has noted that both the MDC and MCC still need to make progress in ensuring that inmates have access to their lawyers.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDecision of the Day: Attorney in Social Security Case Awarded Fees, But Must Pay Client Refund Under Equal Access to Justice Act
The Kids Online Safety Act Threatens Free Speech and Opens the Door to Political Weaponization
6 minute readFTC's New 'Click To Cancel' Rule Is Here, But Will It Survive Judicial Challenge?
9 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'If You Love What You Do and Put the Time and Effort Into It, You Will Excel,' Says Lisa Saul of Forde & O'Meara
- 5Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250