NY Conduct Panel Says Upstate Judge Should Be Censured for 'Inappropriate' Campaigning
The disciplinary commission found that Michelle VanWoeart's campaign literature gave the impression that generating revenue for the town would be an element in her decisions on the bench.
April 28, 2020 at 04:39 PM
3 minute read
A state disciplinary panel says an upstate New York judge should be censured for endorsing crude Facebook comments against her election opponent and making "inappropriate" statements in campaign materials.
The state Commission on Judicial Conduct announced its decision Monday against Michelle VanWoeart, a justice for the Princetown town court in Schenectady County.
VanWoeart, who is not an attorney, has agreed to the censure, the panel said.
The disciplinary commission found that VanWoeart's campaign literature gave the impression that generating revenue for the town would be an element in her decisions on the bench. It also left the impression, according to the commission, that a portion of her responsibility in the position was to raise revenue for the town.
"By creating and distributing the campaign material and the advertisement that repeatedly conveyed this impression, [VanWoeart] breached her ethical obligations," according to the commission.
The campaign material came about while VanWoeart, who previously served as a justice for the court, was running against incumbent Norman Miller in 2018, the panel reported.
The commission cited multiple examples in its determination, including a newspaper advertisement that ran on the day of the primary election. The advertisement featured a pie chart, which appeared to show VanWoeart brought in more money from court proceedings than her opponent during an unidentified four-year period.
"Surrounding the pie chart were the statements: "PRINCETOWN does not have a TOWN TAX. It does get revenue from the court. Compare Miller/VanWoeart revenue (4-year term). PRINCETOWN CAN'T AFFORD ANOTHER 4 YEARS OF NORM MILLER!" according to the commission.
VanWoeart's attorney, John Seebold, said the campaign materials were taken out of context and were meant to show that she was a busy judge on the bench.
Beyond the campaign material, the commission found VanWoeart liked or replied to crude comments posted on her campaign's public Facebook page, including one that called her opponent a "Dirt Bag."
According to the commission, VanWoeart posted about Miller's flyers and liked a comment that read, "I'd like to shove the flyers up Norm's butt!"
Seebold, her attorney, said VanWoeart engaged with many comments on the Facebook page. Those interactions were simply meant to thank campaign supporters, instead of endorsing their specific remarks, he said.
Commission Administrator Robert Tembeckjian issued a statement saying a judge is required to decide a case on its merit, without considering how much money a decision will bring in for the local government.
"It is flat out wrong for a judicial candidate to imply that electing him or her would put money in the local treasury, rather than deliver justice to the litigants and community," he said in the statement.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSo Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readHochul Vetoes 'Grieving Families' Bill, Faulting a Lack of Changes to Suit Her Concerns
Court System Names New Administrative Judges for New York City Courts in Leadership Shakeup
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250