Immigration Suspension Has Questionable Impact
In sum and substance, the edict has little impact on the vast majority of immigrants, their employment- or family-based sponsorship.
April 29, 2020 at 10:30 AM
4 minute read
On April 22, 2020, President Trump signed a proclamation temporarily suspending the immigration of certain immigrants who present a "risk" to the U.S. labor market during the COVID-19 outbreak. In sum and substance, the edict has little impact on the vast majority of immigrants, their employment- or family-based sponsorship.
Very Small Subset of Immigrants Is Impacted
- Commencing at 11:59 p.m. EST on April 23, 2020, and lasting for a period of at least 60 days, consular officers are asked to deny the entry of those immigrants who are outside the United States on the effective date of the proclamation;
- do not have a valid immigrant visa on the effective date; and
- do not have a valid official travel document (such as a transportation letter, boarding foil, or advance parole document) on the effective date or issued on any date thereafter that permits travel to the United States to seek entry or admission.
As most practitioners can attest, the above is a very small subset of all immigrants. In fact, one is hard pressed to think of any reason why an intending immigrant who neither has an immigrant visa nor is in possession of a travel document is before a U.S. consular officer. To be plain, it is nearly impossible that such an event can occur in the next 60 days, since all U.S. Consulates have cancelled immigrant visa appointments as of March 20, 2020. Finally, it is incomprehensible how the identified class of immigrants, either in terms of number or skill set, pose a risk to the U.S. labor market.
Who Is Exempt
Bewilderment as to the nexus between the targeted immigrant class and the risk to the U.S. labor market increases when one parses the exemptions to the temporary suspension:
- any lawful permanent residents;
- any individuals and their spouses or children seeking to enter the U.S. on an immigrant visa as a physician, nurse, or other healthcare professional to perform work essential to combatting, recovering from, or otherwise alleviating the effects of the COVID-19 outbreak (as determined by the Secretary of State and Secretary of Homeland Security, or their respective designees);
- any individuals applying for a visa to enter the U.S. pursuant to the EB-5 immigrant investor visa program;
- any spouses of U.S. citizens;
- any child of a U.S. citizen under the age of 21 and prospective adoptees seeking to enter on an IR-4 or IH-4 visa;
- any individual whose entry would further important United States law enforcement objectives, as determined by the Secretary of State and Secretary of Homeland Security, or their respective designees, based on a recommendation of the Attorney General or his designee;
- any member of the United States Armed Forces and any spouse and children of a member of the United States Armed Forces;
- any individual seeking to enter the United States pursuant to a Special Immigrant Visa in the SI or SQ classification, subject to such conditions as the Secretary of State may impose, and any spouse and children of any such individual; or
- any individual whose entry would be in the national interest, as determined by the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Homeland Security, or their respective designees.
What To Expect
The proclamation does require the Secretaries of Labor and the Department of Homeland Security to evaluate nonimmigrant programs by May 23, 2020, and make specific recommendations to the President to protect U.S. workers and stimulate the economy and to ensure the prioritization, hiring, and employment of U.S. workers. The results of these evaluations ought to be of keen interest to both employers and foreign national workers.
Both the U.S. Department of Labor and the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services continue to accept and adjudicate applications and petitions, including applications for lawful permanent residence and extensions or changes of nonimmigrant status. Despite its very limited reach, the proclamation appears headed for a challenge in federal court as being beyond the President's authority under §212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, since it serves no legitimate national security purpose.
Amy Haberman, a partner in the New York office of McCarter & English, is chair of the firm's labor & employment law practice and partner-in-charge of the group's immigration practice. She can be reached at [email protected]. Zack Hadzismajlovic heads the firm's global trade, CFIUS and export controls practice and focuses his practice on international trade, export controls and customs matters as well as U.S. and U.K. immigration and global mobility issues. He can be reached at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Public Is Best Served by an Ethics Commission That Is Not Dominated by the People It Oversees
4 minute readThe Crisis of Incarcerated Transgender People: A Call to Action for the Judiciary, Prosecutors, and Defense Counsel
5 minute read‘Catholic Charities v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission’: Another Consequence of 'Hobby Lobby'?
8 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1How We Won It: Latham Secures Back-to-Back ITC Patent Wins for California Companies
- 2Meta agrees to pay $25 million to settle lawsuit from Trump after Jan. 6 suspension
- 3Stevens & Lee Hires Ex-Middle District of Pennsylvania U.S. Attorney as White-Collar Co-Chair
- 4Alameda Judge Ursula Jones Dickson Chosen as District Attorney
- 5'A Long 6 Years': No $150M for Goldman Sachs Investors
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250