Relaxing Restrictions, NY Courts Say Electronic Motion Filing Is Set to Resume for Pending Cases
The announcement Thursday from Chief Administrative Judge Lawrence Marks is the second major step in rolling back the court system's coronavirus-related restrictions.
April 30, 2020 at 05:34 PM
3 minute read
The New York state courts will move another step closer to full function on Monday, when attorneys will be able to file motions and responses in pending cases.
The announcement Thursday from Chief Administrative Judge Lawrence Marks is the second major step in rolling back the court system's coronavirus-related restrictions. It comes nearly three weeks after the courts reopened for virtual conferences in pending cases; judges have held conferences and other virtual proceedings in more than 25,000 cases so far, and a third of those have been settled or otherwise disposed, Marks reported.
Progress in all cases categorized as "non-essential" was frozen by state court leaders on March 16 in an attempt to slow the spread of COVID-19 across New York.
Virtual capabilities were rolled out statewide in the weeks after the freeze, and a new electronic document delivery will be available Monday for jurisdictions without e-filing, Marks wrote in Thursday's announcement.
Notices of appeal and other paperwork can also be filed electronically, according to Marks' memo, and the state's problem-solving courts will reopen for virtual conferences on Skype for Business. Judges are also allowed to refer matters for alternative dispute resolution, Marks wrote.
Marks did not lay out a timeline in the memo for the reopening of other court functions, including the filing of new cases or the expansion of in-person proceedings. He emphasized that eliminating the "current backlog of undecided matters" will be important in helping the court system absorb the expected surge of new litigation when normal operations resume.
The state's COVID-19 indicators continued to improve as of Wednesday, with hospital discharges increasing and hospital admissions and ICU admissions declining.
In a statement, New York State Bar Association president Henry "Hank" Greenberg praised the expansion of motion filing.
"It is welcome news for attorneys across the state—and for all New Yorkers—that New York's virtual courts will be expanding the type of motions that can be filed and allowing the filing of appeals in existing cases," Greenberg said. "New York's lawyers are thrilled to see the virtual courts take another step toward normal operations, and we wholeheartedly support the latest actions taken by the court system."
|READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHochul Vetoes 'Grieving Families' Bill, Faulting a Lack of Changes to Suit Her Concerns
Court System Names New Administrative Judges for New York City Courts in Leadership Shakeup
3 minute readRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250