Relaxing Restrictions, NY Courts Say Electronic Motion Filing Is Set to Resume for Pending Cases
The announcement Thursday from Chief Administrative Judge Lawrence Marks is the second major step in rolling back the court system's coronavirus-related restrictions.
April 30, 2020 at 05:34 PM
3 minute read
The New York state courts will move another step closer to full function on Monday, when attorneys will be able to file motions and responses in pending cases.
The announcement Thursday from Chief Administrative Judge Lawrence Marks is the second major step in rolling back the court system's coronavirus-related restrictions. It comes nearly three weeks after the courts reopened for virtual conferences in pending cases; judges have held conferences and other virtual proceedings in more than 25,000 cases so far, and a third of those have been settled or otherwise disposed, Marks reported.
Progress in all cases categorized as "non-essential" was frozen by state court leaders on March 16 in an attempt to slow the spread of COVID-19 across New York.
Virtual capabilities were rolled out statewide in the weeks after the freeze, and a new electronic document delivery will be available Monday for jurisdictions without e-filing, Marks wrote in Thursday's announcement.
Notices of appeal and other paperwork can also be filed electronically, according to Marks' memo, and the state's problem-solving courts will reopen for virtual conferences on Skype for Business. Judges are also allowed to refer matters for alternative dispute resolution, Marks wrote.
Marks did not lay out a timeline in the memo for the reopening of other court functions, including the filing of new cases or the expansion of in-person proceedings. He emphasized that eliminating the "current backlog of undecided matters" will be important in helping the court system absorb the expected surge of new litigation when normal operations resume.
The state's COVID-19 indicators continued to improve as of Wednesday, with hospital discharges increasing and hospital admissions and ICU admissions declining.
In a statement, New York State Bar Association president Henry "Hank" Greenberg praised the expansion of motion filing.
"It is welcome news for attorneys across the state—and for all New Yorkers—that New York's virtual courts will be expanding the type of motions that can be filed and allowing the filing of appeals in existing cases," Greenberg said. "New York's lawyers are thrilled to see the virtual courts take another step toward normal operations, and we wholeheartedly support the latest actions taken by the court system."
READ MORE:
Virtual Courts Expanded; New Filings Still Banned
First Department Going 'Virtual' to Reopen Operations, Attorney Admissions
Definition of 'Essential' Court Services in COVID-19 Response Begins to Come Into Focus
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Data Disposition—Conquering the Seemingly Unscalable Mountain
- 2Who Are the Judges Assigned to Challenges to Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Order?
- 3Litigators of the Week: A Directed Verdict Win for Cisco in a West Texas Patent Case
- 4Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 5Womble Bond Becomes First Firm in UK to Roll Out AI Tool Firmwide
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250