Judge Orders Inspection of Manhattan Federal Jail in Inmates' Lawsuit Over COVID-19 Response
The proposed class action, filed by attorneys from Covington & Burling, said the coronavirus was spreading "unmonitored and undetected" throughout MCC.
May 04, 2020 at 06:01 PM
5 minute read
A federal judge said Monday that he would open Metropolitan Correctional Center to inspection by a medical expert, after inmates sued the Manhattan jail over its response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
The planned inspection, which could take place as early as this week, would mirror a similar court-ordered examination of Brooklyn's Metropolitan Detention Center April 23 that found widespread failures by federal prison officials in testing for the coronavirus and screening inmates for symptoms of COVID-19.
Inmates at MCC last week accused the jail and its warden, Marti Licon-Vitale, in a federal lawsuit of "ineptitude and indifference" in responding to a burgeoning crisis within its walls.
The proposed class action, filed by attorneys from Covington & Burling, said the coronavirus was spreading "unmonitored and undetected" throughout MCC, due in large part to overcrowding and unsanitary conditions. According to the filing, people exhibiting known symptoms of COVID-19 had not been removed larger clusters of inmates, and testing and tracing of cases at the facility were nearly nonexistent.
While officials have previously acknowledged a shortage of tests at MCC, representatives from the federal Bureau of Prisons said aggressive measures were in place and the spread of the virus had largely been contained.
District Judge Edgardo Ramos of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York noted during a nearly two-hour hearing on Monday that he was receiving "two very, very different" assessments of the conditions inside MCC and said that discovery in the case must include a full inspection by a qualified medical expert. Details of the inspection were expected to be hashed out in court filings later this week.
As of April 30, only eight inmates at MCC had been tested for COVID-19 at the lower Manhattan facility, which houses about 700 people. According to court-mandated reporting, five of those inmates had contracted the virus.
A lawyer from the Manhattan U.S. Attorney's Office, which is representing the MCC and its warden, said Monday that the jail's suppliers were only selling tests in batches of 10 at a time due to increased demand.
The lawyer, Assistant U.S. Attorney Jean-David Barnea, said the facility currently had 17 tests that were available to be administered, but tests were only being given to inmates whose symptoms were severe enough to warrant medical isolation or hospitalization.
"Aside from potential asymptomatic carriers," he said, "there is no one to test."
Barnea said that units at MCC had been "sub-divided" into "cohorts" of no more than 10 inmates in an effort to limit contact and slow the spread of the virus. Each cohort, he said, had a designated orderly to clean "high-touch surfaces," and a deep-cleaning of shared spaces was conducted at the end of the day.
Inmates, Barnea added, were supposed to be provided with two cloth masks and could obtain an extra bar of soap and roll of toilet paper each week, free of charge.
Covington & Burling partner Arlo Devlin-Brown, however, strongly refuted what he called MCC's "rosy descriptions" of the BOP's response, citing reports from "inmate after inmate" who said they did not have access to the supplies they need. He also noted that the MCC's own numbers indicated that about 20% of prison staff had contracted COVID-19, leading to the unavoidable conclusion that the virus was "in the facility where they work."
Ramos, meanwhile, said that, while "there's such a divide in the information that's being provided" by both sides, "it certainly does seem to me that there is a higher incidence [of infection] at MCC than the BOP is aware of."
Ramos did, however, deny the petitioners' request for a temporary restraining order directing MCC to take "immediate action" imposing measures to halt the spread of the virus.
The judge directed the parties to submit letters by Wednesday detailing their proposed discovery plans, including possible protocols governing the planned inspection of MCC. According to court filings, the tour would likely be led by Homer Venters, a doctor specializing in the provision of medical care in jails and prisons who carried out last month's inspection across the river at MDC.
The examination, Ramos said, could happen as early as Friday or over the weekend.
Attorneys for the BOP also said Monday that the agency was prioritizing at-risk inmates for release to home confinement during the pandemic and that the agency would work more quickly to determine which met certain criteria based on their status at the facility.
Alan Vinegrad, another Covington attorney representing the inmates, said he welcomed the BOP's increased sense of urgency, but faulted officials for how little progress they had made to date.
"The numbers, I think, are frankly just shocking in terms of how little MCC has done," he said.
A hearing on the inmates' request for a preliminary injunction in the case was scheduled for June 2 at 10 am.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Picks Personal Criminal Defense Lawyers for Solicitor General, Deputy Attorney General
SEC Under Trump 2.0 Likely to Take More 'Measured' Enforcement Approach, Observers Say
Decision of the Day: Attorney in Social Security Case Awarded Fees, But Must Pay Client Refund Under Equal Access to Justice Act
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1How Secure Is the AI System Your Law Firm Is Using?
- 2Trying a Case for Abu Ghraib Detainees Two Decades After Abuse
- 3The Distribution of Dangerous Products Via Online Marketplaces
- 4The Products Liability Case Against Tianeptine: The Deadly ‘Dietary Supplement’ Found at Your Local Store
- 5The Evolving Landscape of Joint and Several Liability in Pa.: A Post-'Spencer' Analysis
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250