US Judge Tosses Nurse Union Lawsuit Faulting Bronx Hospital's COVID-19 Response
U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman wrote that the court lacked the subject-matter jurisdiction to grant the injunction, but urged both sides to find a resolution.
May 04, 2020 at 01:13 PM
3 minute read
A Manhattan federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit that accused a Bronx hospital of not doing enough to protect nurses battling the coronavirus crisis.
The federal litigation from the New York State Nurses Association against the Montefiore Medical Center argued that nurses were treating sick patients with "inadequate" equipment and were frequently working while sick because they were "forced back to work too early."
The suit sought a preliminary injunction and a temporary restraining order to force the hospital to provide a sufficient amount of personal protective equipment.
U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman wrote late Friday that the court lacked the subject-matter jurisdiction to grant the injunction, but urged both sides to find a resolution.
The nurses union and the hospital both presumably want to heighten protections for frontline workers, he wrote, and both sides are in a better position to reach that goal than a court or an arbitrator. If an amicable resolution fails, Furman wrote he hopes both sides move to accelerate arbitration proceedings.
"This Court may lack authority to address NYSNA's concerns, but to the extent these concerns are valid, it is critical that they be addressed as swiftly as possible," the judge wrote. "Lives may hang in the balance, and the NYSNA nurses deserve as much."
Furman expressed sympathy for both sides in the lawsuit. He lauded nurses as being heroes, saying they put their own lives at risk every day to try and save others. But he wrote the challenges facing hospitals are "undoubtedly staggering," considering diminished resources and extraordinary demand.
Along with concerns about equipment access, the nurse union lawsuit asserted that nurses were treating coronavirus patients in rooms that were not properly converted to handle a COVID-19 patient. It also alleged nurses were treating patients in practice areas where they haven't been trained.
A Montefiore representative issued a statement characterizing the union's behavior as "disgraceful and counterproductive," panning it as "a distraction from our efforts to save lives throughout the crisis."
The nurses union issued its own statement, saying the medical center, following the lawsuit filing, has said it will expand COVID-19 testing to more nurses and properly fit nurses with N95 respirator masks.
The union argued that every safety improvement made by the medical center stemmed from nurses fighting for working conditions.
The litigation against Montefiore was one of three similar lawsuits filed by the union on April 20.
One suit against the state's Department of Health argued the agency failed to ensure that nurses were provided minimal PPE while looking after COVID-19 patients. It was filed in state court.
Another state court lawsuit accused the Westchester Medical Center of creating workplace hazards by rationing N95 respirators and gowns.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readEric Adams Trial Set for April as Defense Urges Dismissal of Bribery Count
Major Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-61
- 2Decision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
- 3US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 4Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 5McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250