US Judge Tosses Nurse Union Lawsuit Faulting Bronx Hospital's COVID-19 Response
U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman wrote that the court lacked the subject-matter jurisdiction to grant the injunction, but urged both sides to find a resolution.
May 04, 2020 at 01:13 PM
3 minute read
A Manhattan federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit that accused a Bronx hospital of not doing enough to protect nurses battling the coronavirus crisis.
The federal litigation from the New York State Nurses Association against the Montefiore Medical Center argued that nurses were treating sick patients with "inadequate" equipment and were frequently working while sick because they were "forced back to work too early."
The suit sought a preliminary injunction and a temporary restraining order to force the hospital to provide a sufficient amount of personal protective equipment.
U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman wrote late Friday that the court lacked the subject-matter jurisdiction to grant the injunction, but urged both sides to find a resolution.
The nurses union and the hospital both presumably want to heighten protections for frontline workers, he wrote, and both sides are in a better position to reach that goal than a court or an arbitrator. If an amicable resolution fails, Furman wrote he hopes both sides move to accelerate arbitration proceedings.
"This Court may lack authority to address NYSNA's concerns, but to the extent these concerns are valid, it is critical that they be addressed as swiftly as possible," the judge wrote. "Lives may hang in the balance, and the NYSNA nurses deserve as much."
Furman expressed sympathy for both sides in the lawsuit. He lauded nurses as being heroes, saying they put their own lives at risk every day to try and save others. But he wrote the challenges facing hospitals are "undoubtedly staggering," considering diminished resources and extraordinary demand.
Along with concerns about equipment access, the nurse union lawsuit asserted that nurses were treating coronavirus patients in rooms that were not properly converted to handle a COVID-19 patient. It also alleged nurses were treating patients in practice areas where they haven't been trained.
A Montefiore representative issued a statement characterizing the union's behavior as "disgraceful and counterproductive," panning it as "a distraction from our efforts to save lives throughout the crisis."
The nurses union issued its own statement, saying the medical center, following the lawsuit filing, has said it will expand COVID-19 testing to more nurses and properly fit nurses with N95 respirator masks.
The union argued that every safety improvement made by the medical center stemmed from nurses fighting for working conditions.
The litigation against Montefiore was one of three similar lawsuits filed by the union on April 20.
One suit against the state's Department of Health argued the agency failed to ensure that nurses were provided minimal PPE while looking after COVID-19 patients. It was filed in state court.
Another state court lawsuit accused the Westchester Medical Center of creating workplace hazards by rationing N95 respirators and gowns.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 2Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 3Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 4Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
- 5Freshfields Hires Ex-SEC Corporate Finance Director in Silicon Valley
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250