On April 2, 2020, the Court of Appeals issued its landmark decision in Regina Metropolitan Co., LLC v. New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal. In its 4-3 ruling, the court held that retroactive application of Part F of the 2019 HSTPA violated the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

The majority and dissenting opinions run 109 pages, and are not easily summarized. This article will explain what the majority did, and did not, primarily hold.

‘Regina’ Goes Beyond ‘Roberts’-Type Overcharge Cases

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]